Imaging in Craniofacial Disorders With Special Emphasis on Gradient Echo Black-Bone and Zero Time Echo MRI Sequences.

Mario Ganau, Nikolaos C Syrmos, Shailendra A Magdum
Author Information
  1. Mario Ganau: Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  2. Nikolaos C Syrmos: Department of Neurosurgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.
  3. Shailendra A Magdum: Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Context: The well-known effects of ionizing radiation on brain cells have been a major driving force toward the use of non-ionizing methods of imaging in both elective and emergency settings. Pediatric neurosurgery has certainly leveraged on this shift in clinical practice, however patients with craniofacial disorders could not fully benefit from the adoption of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because computed tomography (CT) scans still retain superior imaging power on bone tissue.
Aims: To explore the knowledge available on the use of MRI as surrogate for CT scan in the assessment of craniosynostosis.
Settings and Design: A scoping review was designed to identify landmark studies and ongoing clinical trials exploring the accuracy of MRI-based bone imaging in the preoperative planning of pediatric patients with craniosynostosis.
Materials and Methods: A total of 492 records were screened from Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases; while 55 records were retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov register. Only clinical studies revolving around the use of Gradient Echo Black-Bone (BB) and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) MRI sequences for the preoperative planning of pediatric craniosynostosis were retained for inclusion.
Results and Conclusions: This review identified only five clinical studies reporting a high accuracy of MRI-based 3D bone reconstruction in 47 pediatric candidates to surgical correction of craniosynostosis. Although promising, limited evidence (Level IV) exist that BB and ZTE MRI could help in the surgical planning for craniosynostosis management. The results of two ongoing randomized clinical trials, which are actively enrolling patients, will hopefully help answering this research question.

Keywords

References

  1. Hell J Nucl Med. 2017 May-Aug;20(2):166-168 [PMID: 28697194]
  2. Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;46(2):123-139 [PMID: 30851746]
  3. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Dec;213(6):1374-1380 [PMID: 31532254]
  4. Transl Pediatr. 2021 Apr;10(4):1231-1243 [PMID: 34012863]
  5. Clin Radiol. 2004 May;59(5):446-50 [PMID: 15081850]
  6. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2021 Apr;123:73-93 [PMID: 34078538]
  7. Neurochirurgie. 2019 Nov;65(5):269-278 [PMID: 31568779]
  8. Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):107-14 [PMID: 25639956]
  9. Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Feb 1;86(2):226-232 [PMID: 33449467]
  10. Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Jan;44(1):64-72 [PMID: 23917588]
  11. Clin Radiol. 2019 Apr;74(4):326.e15-326.e21 [PMID: 30717981]
  12. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1562-1566 [PMID: 31467238]
  13. Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):1457-64 [PMID: 23091288]
  14. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Apr;73(4):723-731 [PMID: 31917189]
  15. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Sep;28(9):1389-93 [PMID: 22872253]
  16. Health Promot Perspect. 2018 Jan 07;8(1):25-32 [PMID: 29423359]
  17. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018 Jul;34(7):1383-1389 [PMID: 29594536]
  18. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Sep;28(9):1311-7 [PMID: 22872242]
  19. Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):229-37 [PMID: 20505061]
  20. J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Sep;23(5):1245-51 [PMID: 22976622]
  21. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jun;163(6):1735-1741 [PMID: 32519160]
  22. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Feb;53(2):504-513 [PMID: 32815203]
  23. Childs Nerv Syst. 2021 Nov;37(11):3465-3473 [PMID: 33829280]
  24. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Mar;9(3):350-358 [PMID: 31032183]
  25. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Jun 25;:1-7 [PMID: 34171835]
  26. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Apr;15(4):350-60 [PMID: 25559921]
  27. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  28. J Appl Genet. 2018 May;59(2):133-147 [PMID: 29392564]
  29. Neuroradiology. 2021 Jan;63(1):91-98 [PMID: 32772120]
  30. Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct;24(10):2417-26 [PMID: 25038852]
  31. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;32(8):2736-2740 [PMID: 34231510]
  32. Semin Plast Surg. 2012 May;26(2):64-75 [PMID: 23633933]
  33. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2597 [PMID: 32537323]
  34. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):509e-515e [PMID: 30020237]
  35. Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Jun;43(6):728-42; quiz 725-7 [PMID: 23636536]
  36. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2021 Aug;68(4):727-742 [PMID: 34247705]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0craniosynostosisclinicalMRIimagingplanningpediatricEchousepatientsbonestudiespreoperativeneurosurgeryCTreviewongoingtrialsaccuracyMRI-basedrecordsGradientBlack-BoneBBZeroTimeZTE3DreconstructionsurgicalhelpContext:well-knowneffectsionizingradiationbraincellsmajordrivingforcetowardnon-ionizingmethodselectiveemergencysettingsPediatriccertainlyleveragedshiftpracticehowevercraniofacialdisordersfullybenefitadoptionmagneticresonancecomputedtomographyscansstillretainsuperiorpowertissueAims:exploreknowledgeavailablesurrogatescanassessmentSettingsDesign:scopingdesignedidentifylandmarkexploringMaterialsMethods:total492screenedPubmedOvidMedlineScopusCochraneLibrarydatabases55retrievedClinicalTrialsgovregisterrevolvingaroundsequencesretainedinclusionResultsConclusions:identifiedfivereportinghigh47candidatescorrectionAlthoughpromisinglimitedevidenceLevelIVexistmanagementresultstworandomizedactivelyenrollingwillhopefullyansweringresearchquestionImagingCraniofacialDisordersSpecialEmphasisSequencesneuroradiology

Similar Articles

Cited By