Introducing FCR6-Brain: Measuring fear of cancer recurrence in brain tumor patients and their caregivers.

Sarah Ellen Braun, Kelcie D Willis, Samantha N Mladen, Farah Aslanzadeh, Autumn Lanoye, Jenna Langbein, Morgan Reid, Ashlee R Loughan
Author Information
  1. Sarah Ellen Braun: Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1201 East Marshall St, Richmond, VA, USA. ORCID
  2. Kelcie D Willis: Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 806 West Franklin Street, Box 842018, Richmond, VA 23284-2018, USA.
  3. Samantha N Mladen: Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 806 West Franklin Street, Box 842018, Richmond, VA 23284-2018, USA.
  4. Farah Aslanzadeh: Department of Neuropsychology, Baltimore VA Medical Center, 10 N Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
  5. Autumn Lanoye: Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 College Street Richmond, VA, USA.
  6. Jenna Langbein: Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 1201 E Marshall St #4-100, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
  7. Morgan Reid: Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 806 West Franklin Street, Box 842018, Richmond, VA 23284-2018, USA.
  8. Ashlee R Loughan: Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1201 East Marshall St, Richmond, VA, USA.

Abstract

Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a psychological consequence of cancer diagnosis that impacts quality of life in neuro-oncology. However, the instruments used to assess FCR have not been tested for validity in patients with brain tumors. The present study explored the psychometric properties of a brief FCR scale in patients with primary brain tumor (PBT) and their caregivers.
Methods: Adult patients with PBT ( = 165) and their caregivers ( = 117) completed the FCR-7-item scale (FCR7) and measures of psychological functioning. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were conducted for both patient and caregiver FCR7. Convergent validity, prevalence, the difference between FCR in patients and caregivers, and relationships with relevant medical and demographic variables were explored.
Results: EFAs revealed a single factor with one item demonstrating poor loading for both patients and caregivers. Removal of the item measuring hypervigilance symptoms (checking for physical signs of tumor) greatly improved the single factor metrics. The amended scale (FCR6-Brain) demonstrated good convergent validity. Caregiver FCR was significantly higher than patient. Clinical guidance to identify clinically significant FCR was introduced. Age, gender, and time since diagnosis were related to FCR, with higher FCR in younger women more recently diagnosed.
Conclusions: The FCR6-Brain is the first validated instrument to assess FCR in this population and should be used to identify individuals at risk for FCR and guide development of future psychotherapeutic interventions. This study highlights the distinct characteristics of FCR in neuro-oncology. Symptoms of hypervigilance in PBT patients need further investigation.

Keywords

References

  1. J Gen Psychol. 1970 Apr;82(2d Half):165-77 [PMID: 4394812]
  2. Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):821-7 [PMID: 26935517]
  3. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Feb 9;16(1):30 [PMID: 29471823]
  4. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Mar;28(1):16-30 [PMID: 31848927]
  5. Ann Oncol. 2010 Nov;21(11):2262-2266 [PMID: 20423914]
  6. Psychooncology. 2021 Jul;30(7):1120-1128 [PMID: 33599334]
  7. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Apr;21(4):1105-11 [PMID: 23104453]
  8. Psychooncology. 2020 Feb;29(2):430-436 [PMID: 31713279]
  9. Acta Oncol. 2019 May;58(5):708-714 [PMID: 30741082]
  10. Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66 [PMID: 19269895]
  11. Qual Life Res. 2012 Apr;21(3):517-25 [PMID: 21691928]
  12. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3265-8 [PMID: 27169703]
  13. Cancer Nurs. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;45(1):E10-E26 [PMID: 32657897]
  14. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  15. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76 [PMID: 26828106]
  16. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 [PMID: 18929686]
  17. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  18. BMC Res Notes. 2016 Apr 19;9:226 [PMID: 27094345]
  19. Physiol Behav. 2004 Sep 30;82(4):727-31 [PMID: 15327923]
  20. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 May-Jun;30(3):493-9 [PMID: 12719748]
  21. Psychol Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):427-34 [PMID: 21781374]
  22. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb;23(2):193-204 [PMID: 18609335]
  23. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;3(3):e1235 [PMID: 32671982]
  24. Neurosci Res. 2010 Oct;68(2):77-87 [PMID: 20603163]
  25. Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:640866 [PMID: 33692731]
  26. Psychooncology. 2017 Nov;26(11):1799-1809 [PMID: 27421919]
  27. Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 09;11:1287 [PMID: 32581984]
  28. Psychooncology. 2007 Mar;16(3):214-23 [PMID: 16906624]
  29. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):300-22 [PMID: 23475398]
  30. Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74 [PMID: 18388841]
  31. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):699-708 [PMID: 24552317]
  32. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Summer;23(3):340-7 [PMID: 21948896]
  33. World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:733-740 [PMID: 28434963]
  34. Omega (Westport). 2011-2012;64(2):171-84 [PMID: 22375351]
  35. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6 [PMID: 9255702]
  36. J Neurooncol. 2012 Mar;107(1):207-12 [PMID: 21984115]
  37. Neuro Oncol. 2008 Apr;10(2):171-81 [PMID: 18314416]
  38. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):567-76 [PMID: 26195347]
  39. Addict Behav. 2003 Mar;28(2):225-48 [PMID: 12573676]
  40. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208 [PMID: 31078660]
  41. Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 16;12:625654 [PMID: 34335354]
  42. Psychooncology. 2009 Aug;18(8):841-8 [PMID: 19101920]
  43. Acta Oncol. 2013 Aug;52(6):1102-9 [PMID: 23384721]
  44. Psychooncology. 2012 Jun;21(6):571-87 [PMID: 22021099]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR002649/NCATS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FCRpatientscaregiverscancervaliditybraintumorrecurrenceneuro-oncologyscalePBTfactorpsychologicaldiagnosisusedassessstudyexploredprimary=FCR7patientsingleitemhypervigilanceFCR6-BrainhigheridentifyfearBackground:FearconsequenceimpactsqualitylifeHoweverinstrumentstestedtumorspresentpsychometricpropertiesbriefMethods:Adult165117completedFCR-7-itemmeasuresfunctioningExploratoryanalysesEFAconductedcaregiverConvergentprevalencedifferencerelationshipsrelevantmedicaldemographicvariablesResults:EFAsrevealedonedemonstratingpoorloadingRemovalmeasuringsymptomscheckingphysicalsignsgreatlyimprovedmetricsamendeddemonstratedgoodconvergentCaregiversignificantlyClinicalguidanceclinicallysignificantintroducedAgegendertimesincerelatedyoungerwomenrecentlydiagnosedConclusions:firstvalidatedinstrumentpopulationindividualsriskguidedevelopmentfuturepsychotherapeuticinterventionshighlightsdistinctcharacteristicsSymptomsneedinvestigationIntroducingFCR6-Brain:Measuringmeasurement

Similar Articles

Cited By