Information seeking in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).

Regina Paxton Gazes, Victoria L Templer, Kimberly C Rodgers, Jennifer L Mickelberg, Tara S Stoinski
Author Information
  1. Regina Paxton Gazes: Zoo Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA. reggie.gazes@bucknell.edu.
  2. Victoria L Templer: Department of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.
  3. Kimberly C Rodgers: Zoo Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  4. Jennifer L Mickelberg: Zoo Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  5. Tara S Stoinski: Zoo Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Abstract

Many animals will seek information when they do not know the answer to a problem, suggesting that they monitor their knowledge state. In the classic "tubes task," subjects are presented with a set of opaque tubes and either see (visible trials) or do not see (hidden trials) which tube holds a food reward on a given trial. Chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, and human children show information-seeking behavior on this task, looking into the tubes to find the reward more on hidden than on visible trials. However, evidence for information-seeking behavior in gorillas is limited. In Experiment 1, gorillas that were presented with a classic information-seeking tubes task showed performance patterns consistent with metacognitive behavior; they looked down tubes more on hidden than on visible trials, their accuracy on hidden trials on which they looked was higher than on hidden trials on which they did not look, and they primarily employed an appropriate search strategy when looking down the tubes. In Experiment 2, we decreased or increased the amount of effort required to look down the tubes by increasing or decreasing the height of the tubes, respectively. Gorillas were less likely to look in tubes on trials that required high effort, but continued to look more on hidden than on visible trials, indicating that their tendency to look was affected by both knowledge state and effort. Together these results provide strong evidence for logical, controlled information-seeking behavior by gorillas.

Keywords

References

  1. Basile, B. M., Hampton, R. R., Suomi, S. J., & Murray, E. A. (2009). An assessment of memory awareness in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 12(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0180-1 [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0180-1]
  2. Basile, B. M., Schroeder, G. R., Brown, E. K., Templer, V. L., & Hampton, R. R. (2015). Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000031 [DOI: 10.1037/xge0000031]
  3. Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., & Washburn, D. A. (2006a). Rhesus macaques.
  4. Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., & Washburn, D. A. (2006b). (Macaca mulatta) monitor uncertainty during numerosity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.32.2.111 [DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.2.111]
  5. Beran, M. J., Smith, J. D., & Perdue, B. M. (2013). Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) name what they have seen but look first at what they have not seen. Psychological Science, 24(5), 660–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458936
  6. Beran, M. J., Perdue, B. M., Futch, S. E., Smith, J. D., Evans, T. A., & Parrish, A. E. (2015). Go when you know: Chimpanzees’ confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task. Cognition, 142, 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.023 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.023]
  7. Brown, E. K., Basile, B. M., Templer, V. L., & Hampton, R. R. (2019). Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 22(3), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01246-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-019-01246-5]
  8. Call, J. (2010). Do apes know that they could be wrong? Animal Cognition, 13(5), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0317-x [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-010-0317-x]
  9. Call, J., & Carpenter, M. (2001). Do apes and children know what they have seen? Animal Cognition, 3(4), 207–220. [DOI: 10.1007/s100710100078]
  10. Carruthers, P. (2008). Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look. Mind and Language, 23(1), 58–89. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00329.x]
  11. Fujita, K. (2009, Jul). Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 12(4), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0217-0 [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0217-0]
  12. Hampton, R. R. (2009). Multiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhumans: Converging evidence or multiple mechanisms? Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 4, 17–28. [DOI: 10.3819/ccbr.2009.40002]
  13. Hampton, R. R., Zivin, A., & Murray, E. A. (2004). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting. Animal Cognition, 7, 239–254. [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0215-1]
  14. Kornell, N. (2009). Metacognition in humans and animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01597.x [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01597.x]
  15. Kornell, N., Son, L. K., & Terrace, H. S. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18(1), 64–71. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01850.x]
  16. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. [DOI: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13]
  17. Marsh, H. L. (2014). Metacognitive-like information seeking in lion-tailed macaques: A generalized search response after all? Animal Cognition, 17(6), 1313–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0767-7 [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0767-7]
  18. Marsh, H. L., & MacDonald, S. E. (2012a). Information seeking by orangutans: A generalized search strategy? Animal Cognition, 15(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0453-y [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0453-y]
  19. Marsh, H. L., & MacDonald, S. E. (2012b). Orangutans (Pongo abelii) "Play The Odds": Information-seeking strategies in relation to cost, risk, and benefit. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025906 [DOI: 10.1037/a0025906]
  20. Nsekanabo, J. D., Leeds, A., Eckardt, W., Tuyisingize, D., Nyiramana, A., & Lukas, K. E. (2022). Distinguishing mobility and immobility when establishing species-specific activity budgets: A case study with gorillas (Gorilla berengei berengei and Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Zoo Biology. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21673
  21. Paukner, A., Anderson, J., & Fujita, K. (2006). Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): A failure of metacognition? Animal Cognition, 9(2), 110–117. [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-005-0007-2]
  22. Perdue, B. M., Evans, T. A., & Beran, M. J. (2018). Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0193229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193229
  23. R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  24. Rosati, A. G., & Santos, L. R. (2016). Spontaneous metacognition in rhesus monkeys. Psychological Science, 27(9), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616653737 [DOI: 10.1177/0956797616653737]
  25. Schwartz, B. (2019). Using natural ecology to predict higher cognition in human and non-human primates. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 6, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.06.04.13.2019 [DOI: 10.26451/abc.06.04.13.2019]
  26. Smith, J. D., Coutinho, M. V. C., Church, B. A., & Beran, M. J. (2013). Executive-attentional uncertainty responses by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029601 [DOI: 10.1037/a0029601]
  27. Smith, T. R., Smith, J. D., & Beran, M. J. (2018). Not knowing what one knows: A Meaningful failure of metacognition in capuchin monkeys. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 5(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.05.01.05.2018 [DOI: 10.26451/abc.05.01.05.2018]
  28. Smith, T. R., Parrish, A. E., Creamer, C., Rossettie, M., & Beran, M. J. (2020). Capuchin monkeys (sometimes) go when they know: Confidence movements in Sapajus apella. Cognition, 199, Article 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104237 [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104237]
  29. Suda-King, C. (2008). Do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) know when they do not remember? Animal Cognition, 11(1), 21–42. [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0082-7]
  30. Suda-King, C., Bania, A. E., Stromberg, E. E., & Subiaul, F. (2013). Gorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory tests. Animal Cognition, 16(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0551-5 [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0551-5]
  31. Templer, V. L. (2022). Metacognition. In M. Beran & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Primate cognitive studies (pp. 314–340). Cambridge University Press. [DOI: 10.1017/9781108955836.013]
  32. Templer, V. L., & Hampton, R. R. (2012). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) show robust evidence for memory awareness across multiple generalization tests. Animal Cognition, 15(3), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0468-4 [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0468-4]
  33. Vining, A. Q., & Marsh, H. L. (2015). Information seeking in capuchins (Cebus apella): A rudimentary form of metacognition? Animal Cognition, 18(3), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0835-7 [DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0835-7]

Grants

  1. P20 GM103430/NIGMS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Animals
Gorilla gorilla
Information Seeking Behavior
Hominidae
Pongo pygmaeus
Pan troglodytes

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tubestrialshiddenlooktaskvisibleinformation-seekingbehaviorgorillaseffortknowledgestateclassicpresentedseerewardlookingevidenceExperimentlookedrequiredgorillaManyanimalswillseekinformationknowanswerproblemsuggestingmonitor"tubes"subjectssetopaqueeithertubeholdsfoodgiventrialChimpanzeesbonobosorangutanshumanchildrenshowfindHoweverlimited1showedperformancepatternsconsistentmetacognitiveaccuracyhigherprimarilyemployedappropriatesearchstrategy2decreasedincreasedamountincreasingdecreasingheightrespectivelyGorillaslesslikelyhighcontinuedindicatingtendencyaffectedTogetherresultsprovidestronglogicalcontrolledInformationseekingwesternlowlandGorillaApeMetacognitionPrimateTubes

Similar Articles

Cited By