Investigating the shift between externally and internally oriented cognition: a novel task-switching paradigm.

Sara Calzolari, Svetla Boneva, Davinia Fernández-Espejo
Author Information
  1. Sara Calzolari: Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, 05 CHBH Building, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. ORCID
  2. Svetla Boneva: Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, 05 CHBH Building, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
  3. Davinia Fernández-Espejo: Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, 05 CHBH Building, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Despite our constant need to flexibly balance internal and external information, research on cognitive flexibility has focused solely on shifts between externally oriented tasks. In contrast, switches across internally oriented processes (and self-referential cognition specifically) and between internal and external domains have never been investigated. Here, we report a novel task-switching paradigm developed to explore the behavioural signatures associated with cognitive flexibility when self-referential processes, as well as more traditional external processes, are involved. Two hundred healthy volunteers completed an online task. In each trial, participants performed one of four possible tasks on written words, as instructed by a pre-stimulus cue. These included two externally and two internally oriented tasks: assessing whether the third letter was a consonant or the penultimate letter was a vowel versus assessing whether the adjective applied to their personality or if it described a bodily sensation they were currently experiencing. In total, 40% of trials involved switches to another task, and these were equally distributed across within-external, within-internal, internal-to-external and external-to-internal switches. We found higher response times for switches compared to repetitions both in the external and internal domains, thus demonstrating the presence of switch costs in self-referential tasks for the first time. We also found higher response times for between-domain switches compared to switches within each domain. We propose that these effects originate from the goal-directed engagement of different domain-specific cognitive systems that flexibly communicate and share domain-general control features.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3217-24 [PMID: 21368033]
  2. Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):153-63 [PMID: 15078052]
  3. Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):713-26 [PMID: 12925284]
  4. Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):849-74 [PMID: 20804238]
  5. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):700-11 [PMID: 17704812]
  6. J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Nov;32(11):2037-2055 [PMID: 32163320]
  7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):107-12 [PMID: 15945203]
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):468-83 [PMID: 12018499]
  9. Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203 [PMID: 30734206]
  10. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Jan;9(1):103-9 [PMID: 10666562]
  11. Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1191-207 [PMID: 23404613]
  12. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90 [PMID: 24417251]
  13. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):50-62 [PMID: 18609401]
  14. Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):433-44 [PMID: 16752606]
  15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752): [PMID: 29915011]
  16. Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):1340-9 [PMID: 20045478]
  17. Exp Psychol. 2008;55(5):322-7 [PMID: 25116299]
  18. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jan;59(1):46-52 [PMID: 16556557]
  19. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 May;16(4):609-20 [PMID: 15165351]
  20. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):971-8 [PMID: 16767087]
  21. Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583 [PMID: 29517261]
  22. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Jun;32(3):493-516 [PMID: 16822121]
  23. Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):76-97 [PMID: 15631554]
  24. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2905-19 [PMID: 21291314]
  25. Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):303-17 [PMID: 20600998]
  26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 Jul;9(3):272-9 [PMID: 5666976]
  27. Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Mar;21(5):1423-31 [PMID: 15813952]
  28. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):1845-1858 [PMID: 29040763]
  29. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;15(3):104-12 [PMID: 21288760]
  30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12569-74 [PMID: 18723676]
  31. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;11(4):600-7 [PMID: 21874602]
  32. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):128-142 [PMID: 28251595]
  33. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):488-92 [PMID: 12921429]
  34. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Oct;45(10):1399-1414 [PMID: 31343243]
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;14(5):785-94 [PMID: 12167262]
  36. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):290-8 [PMID: 17548231]
  37. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:184-96 [PMID: 25004102]
  38. Neuropsychologia. 2016 Feb;82:149-160 [PMID: 26796715]
  39. Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):225-32 [PMID: 21111832]
  40. Cereb Cortex. 2006 Mar;16(3):394-404 [PMID: 15917482]
  41. Biol Psychol. 2015 Sep;110:148-58 [PMID: 26144740]
  42. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jun;19(6):935-44 [PMID: 17536964]
  43. Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116088 [PMID: 31408718]
  44. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9673-8 [PMID: 15976020]
  45. Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:390-397 [PMID: 26892855]
  46. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jan;33(1):130-42 [PMID: 21391260]
  47. Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):234-49 [PMID: 11004878]
  48. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):455-69 [PMID: 12760628]
  49. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 13;10(11):e0142613 [PMID: 26565628]
  50. Brain Res. 2006 Aug 11;1105(1):83-92 [PMID: 16387284]
  51. Brain Cogn. 2021 Jul;151:105725 [PMID: 33932747]
  52. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Mar;8(3):102-7 [PMID: 15301749]
  53. Can J Exp Psychol. 2010 Jun;64(2):129-33 [PMID: 20565179]
  54. Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):440-57 [PMID: 16466680]
  55. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):570-8 [PMID: 20515407]
  56. J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 1;26(5):1429-38 [PMID: 16452666]
  57. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 06;7:264 [PMID: 23761757]
  58. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Mar;33(3):639-51 [PMID: 21391280]
  59. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1812-1820 [PMID: 35394643]
  60. Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:359-65 [PMID: 24830839]
  61. Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):527-37 [PMID: 17919929]
  62. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jan;34(1):12-35 [PMID: 21998090]
  63. Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 15;77:207-14 [PMID: 23567890]
  64. Behav Res Methods. 2005 Feb;37(1):65-70 [PMID: 16097345]
  65. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):468-490 [PMID: 30719626]
  66. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140 [PMID: 12639695]
  67. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Mar 1;5(3):119-126 [PMID: 11239812]
  68. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jun;128(2):290-7 [PMID: 18413272]
  69. Elife. 2015 Apr 13;4:e06481 [PMID: 25866927]
  70. Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):601-26 [PMID: 20565170]
  71. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 20;106(42):17974-9 [PMID: 19805050]
  72. Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jul;133(1):12-22 [PMID: 10933206]
  73. Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):781-9 [PMID: 12956242]
  74. Sci Rep. 2015 May 20;5:10240 [PMID: 25989933]
  75. J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 25;29(12):3930-8 [PMID: 19321789]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0switchesexternalorientedinternalcognitiveexternallytasksinternallyprocessesself-referentialtaskflexiblyflexibilityacrosscognitiondomainsnoveltask-switchingparadigminvolvedtwoassessingwhetherletterfoundhigherresponsetimescomparedDespiteconstantneedbalanceinformationresearchfocusedsolelyshiftscontrastspecificallyneverinvestigatedreportdevelopedexplorebehaviouralsignaturesassociatedwelltraditionalTwohundredhealthyvolunteerscompletedonlinetrialparticipantsperformedonefourpossiblewrittenwordsinstructedpre-stimuluscueincludedtasks:thirdconsonantpenultimatevowelversusadjectiveappliedpersonalitydescribedbodilysensationcurrentlyexperiencingtotal40%trialsanotherequallydistributedwithin-externalwithin-internalinternal-to-externalexternal-to-internalrepetitionsthusdemonstratingpresenceswitchcostsfirsttimealsobetween-domainwithindomainproposeeffectsoriginategoal-directedengagementdifferentdomain-specificsystemscommunicatesharedomain-generalcontrolfeaturesInvestigatingshiftcognition:self-orientedswitching

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)