The TRACK-MS Test Battery: A Very Brief Tool to Track Multiple Sclerosis-Related Cognitive Impairment.

Daniela Taranu, Hayrettin Tumani, Jill Holbrook, Visal Tumani, Ingo Uttner, Patrick Fissler
Author Information
  1. Daniela Taranu: Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, D-89071 Ulm, Germany. ORCID
  2. Hayrettin Tumani: Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, D-89071 Ulm, Germany. ORCID
  3. Jill Holbrook: Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, D-89071 Ulm, Germany.
  4. Visal Tumani: Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, D-89071 Ulm, Germany.
  5. Ingo Uttner: Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, D-89071 Ulm, Germany.
  6. Patrick Fissler: Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, D-89071 Ulm, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

Tracking cognition in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is important for detection of disease progression but it is often not performed in routine settings due to time constraints. This exploratory cohort study aims to develop a very brief repeatable tracking tool with comparable test quality criteria to the current gold standard, the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). The study included 88 participants (22 healthy controls, 66 MS patients) who were examined at baseline and at one-year follow-up. As a validity criterion for the six administered cognitive tests, we assessed the difference between MS patients and HC, and the correlation with MS-related disability. Combining the two tests with the highest validity-the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test-yielded an administration time of 5 min. Comparing this new TRACK-MS test battery with the 15 min BICAMS indicated that TRACK-MS showed larger differences between MS patients and healthy controls, a higher correlation with MS-related disability, smaller practice effects, and a good test-retest reliability. We provide evidence that TRACK-MS, although faster to administer, showed at least comparable quality criteria as the BICAMS. As the study was exploratory, replication of these results is necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Feb;62(1):59-67 [PMID: 3960684]
  2. Neurol Sci. 2009 Feb;30(1):15-20 [PMID: 19153648]
  3. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009 Aug;77 Suppl 1:S28-31 [PMID: 19685387]
  4. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(7):775-83 [PMID: 23957817]
  5. Biomedicines. 2021 Jun 25;9(7): [PMID: 34202246]
  6. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9 [PMID: 15817019]
  7. Mult Scler. 2009 Sep;15(9):1077-84 [PMID: 19556311]
  8. Mult Scler. 2017 Aug;23(9):1258-1267 [PMID: 27738090]
  9. Neurol Res Int. 2019 May 23;2019:4290352 [PMID: 31263596]
  10. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Feb;20:122-128 [PMID: 29414284]
  11. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 May;22(4):475-88 [PMID: 17317094]
  12. Biomedicines. 2021 May 06;9(5): [PMID: 34066395]
  13. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Oct;24(7):1131-45 [PMID: 20830649]
  14. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 [PMID: 1202204]
  15. BMC Neurol. 2018 Oct 17;18(1):172 [PMID: 30332999]
  16. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Jul;12(4):549-58 [PMID: 16981607]
  17. Mult Scler. 2014 Nov;20(13):1745-52 [PMID: 24842959]
  18. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(7):1186-200 [PMID: 23034066]
  19. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Dec;7(12):1139-51 [PMID: 19007738]
  20. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;29(8):804-12 [PMID: 18030632]
  21. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2019 Jan 14;5(1):2055217318822134 [PMID: 30729025]
  22. Open Neurol J. 2018 May 31;12:31-40 [PMID: 30008964]
  23. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;82(10):1157-9 [PMID: 20971755]
  24. Open Neurol J. 2018 Mar 12;12:19-30 [PMID: 29576812]
  25. Mult Scler. 2020 Dec;26(14):1919-1928 [PMID: 31741425]
  26. Acta Neurol Scand. 2008 Jun;117(6):421-7 [PMID: 18081910]
  27. Neuropsychology. 2008 Jul;22(4):442-9 [PMID: 18590356]
  28. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Jun;51:102950 [PMID: 33887609]
  29. Biomedicines. 2019 Mar 19;7(1): [PMID: 30893874]
  30. Arch Neurol. 1990 Mar;47(3):297-301 [PMID: 2310313]
  31. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011 Mar;11(3):411-24 [PMID: 21375446]
  32. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Sep 30;16:998714 [PMID: 36248028]
  33. Mult Scler. 2018 Nov;24(13):1665-1680 [PMID: 30303036]
  34. J Clin Neurol. 2021 Jan;17(1):113-120 [PMID: 33480206]
  35. Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):721-733 [PMID: 28206827]
  36. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2014;21(2):197-213 [PMID: 23895570]
  37. BMC Neurol. 2012 Jul 16;12:55 [PMID: 22799620]
  38. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 22;16:946263 [PMID: 35941933]
  39. BMC Neurol. 2015 Mar 22;15:40 [PMID: 25886168]
  40. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Nov;18:33-40 [PMID: 29141818]
  41. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7 [PMID: 17938396]
  42. Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52 [PMID: 6685237]
  43. Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 29;12(2): [PMID: 35203948]
  44. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jul;32:70-73 [PMID: 31054500]
  45. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020 Dec;120(6):1307-1321 [PMID: 32996098]
  46. Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec;40(12):2555-2564 [PMID: 31321625]
  47. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Oct;22(5):686-701 [PMID: 11094403]
  48. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 May 22;20(7):22 [PMID: 32444997]
  49. J Neurol Sci. 2006 Jun 15;245(1-2):41-6 [PMID: 16643953]
  50. Mult Scler. 2012 Jun;18(6):891-8 [PMID: 22190573]
  51. J Neurol. 2017 Apr;264(4):740-748 [PMID: 28220288]
  52. J Neurol Sci. 2016 Mar 15;362:147-52 [PMID: 26944137]
  53. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Apr;60:103704 [PMID: 35259683]
  54. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):685-91 [PMID: 2027484]
  55. Mult Scler. 2014 Apr;20(4):481-8 [PMID: 24019305]
  56. BMC Neurol. 2014 Sep 10;14:171 [PMID: 25204350]
  57. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Sep;201(9):727-9 [PMID: 23995026]
  58. Int J MS Care. 2012 Fall;14(3):148-59 [PMID: 24453746]
  59. Semin Neurol. 2011 Feb;31(1):18-28 [PMID: 21321830]
  60. Eur J Neurol. 2014 Sep;21(9):1219-25, e71-2 [PMID: 24850580]
  61. Ann Neurol. 2016 Oct;80(4):616-24 [PMID: 27554176]
  62. Front Neurol. 2019 Jun 04;10:581 [PMID: 31214113]
  63. Front Neurol. 2018 May 11;9:331 [PMID: 29867739]
  64. Mult Scler. 2008 Nov;14(9):1242-9 [PMID: 18653737]
  65. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;65:103838 [PMID: 35749960]
  66. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;89(8):844-850 [PMID: 29618493]
  67. Neurol Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):287-306 [PMID: 29923070]
  68. Neurology. 2018 Feb 6;90(6):278-288 [PMID: 29343470]
  69. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2016 Dec;74(12):974-981 [PMID: 27991994]
  70. QJM. 2018 Jun 1;111(6):359-364 [PMID: 28371862]
  71. Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 20;10:261 [PMID: 30949122]
  72. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb;23(2):268-75 [PMID: 18609336]
  73. J Neurol. 2018 Nov;265(11):2587-2593 [PMID: 30171410]
  74. Mult Scler. 2014 Jan;20(1):112-5 [PMID: 23635909]
  75. Brain Pathol. 2015 Jan;25(1):79-98 [PMID: 25521179]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MSTRACK-MSpatientsBICAMSstudytestqualitycriteriacognitionmultiplesclerosisdiseaseprogressiontimeexploratorytrackingcomparableBriefCognitivehealthycontrolscognitivetestscorrelationMS-relateddisabilityTestminshowedTrackingimportantdetectionoftenperformedroutinesettingsdueconstraintscohortaimsdevelopbriefrepeatabletoolcurrentgoldstandardInternationalAssessmentincluded88participants2266examinedbaselineone-yearfollow-upvaliditycriterionsixadministeredassesseddifferenceHCCombiningtwohighestvalidity-theControlledOralWordAssociationSymbolDigitModalitiesTest-yieldedadministration5Comparingnewbattery15indicatedlargerdifferenceshighersmallerpracticeeffectsgoodtest-retestreliabilityprovideevidencealthoughfasteradministerleastreplicationresultsnecessaryBattery:ToolTrackMultipleSclerosis-RelatedImpairmentassessment

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)