Lighting a Path for Autonomous Vehicle Communication: The Effect of Light Projection on the Detection of Reversing Vehicles by Older Adult Pedestrians.

Brian Mason, Sridhar Lakshmanan, Pam McAuslan, Marie Waung, Bochen Jia
Author Information
  1. Brian Mason: College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA. ORCID
  2. Sridhar Lakshmanan: College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA.
  3. Pam McAuslan: College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA.
  4. Marie Waung: College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA. ORCID
  5. Bochen Jia: College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA.

Abstract

Pedestrian understanding of driver intent is key to pedestrian safety on the road and in parking lots. With the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs), the human driver will be removed, and with it, the exchange that occurs between drivers and pedestrians (e.g., head nods, hand gestures). One possible solution for augmenting that communication is an array of high-intensity light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to project vehicle-to-pedestrian (V2P) messages on the ground plane behind a reversing vehicle. This would be particularly beneficial to elderly pedestrians, who are at particular risk of being struck by reversing cars in parking lots. Their downward gaze and slower reaction time make them particularly vulnerable. A survey was conducted to generate designs, and a simulator experiment was conducted to measure detection and reaction times. The study found that elderly pedestrians are significantly more likely to detect an additional projected message on the ground than detect the existing brake light alone when walking in a parking lot.

Keywords

References

  1. J Safety Res. 2011 Feb;42(1):33-7 [PMID: 21392627]
  2. Ergonomics. 1986 Mar;29(3):377-91 [PMID: 3698966]
  3. Hum Factors. 1990 Oct;32(5):571-95 [PMID: 2074110]
  4. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 24;11:5 [PMID: 32038498]
  5. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2001;7(1):15-34 [PMID: 11276262]
  6. JAMA. 1998 Apr 8;279(14):1083-8 [PMID: 9546567]
  7. Accid Anal Prev. 2002 Jul;34(4):487-98 [PMID: 12067111]
  8. Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:266-71 [PMID: 22269509]
  9. Gait Posture. 2014 Feb;39(2):767-72 [PMID: 24268470]
  10. Gerontology. 2004 May-Jun;50(3):177-81 [PMID: 15114040]
  11. Accid Anal Prev. 2006 May;38(3):496-506 [PMID: 16386230]
  12. Eur Spine J. 2000 Dec;9(6):492-8 [PMID: 11189917]

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
Pedestrians
Accidents, Traffic
Autonomous Vehicles
Lighting
Communication

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0parkingpedestrianpedestriansvehicleelderlydriverintentlotsautonomousgroundreversingparticularlydownwardgazereactionconducteddetectlotPedestrianunderstandingkeysafetyroaddevelopmentvehiclesAVshumanwillremovedexchangeoccursdriversegheadnodshandgesturesOnepossiblesolutionaugmentingcommunicationarrayhigh-intensitylight-emittingdiodesLEDsprojectvehicle-to-pedestrianV2PmessagesplanebehindbeneficialparticularriskstruckcarsslowertimemakevulnerablesurveygeneratedesignssimulatorexperimentmeasuredetectiontimesstudyfoundsignificantlylikelyadditionalprojectedmessageexistingbrakelightalonewalkingLightingPathAutonomousVehicleCommunication:EffectLightProjectionDetectionReversingVehiclesOlderAdultPedestriansV2Xautomotivelightinggerontologyhuman-centereddesigninstruction

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)