Factors Associated with Burnout in Healthcare Professionals.

Sabinne Marie Taranu, Adina Carmen Ilie, Ana-Maria Turcu, Ramona Stefaniu, Ioana Alexandra Sandu, Anca Iuliana Pislaru, Ioana Dana Alexa, Calina Anda Sandu, Tudor-Stefan Rotaru, Teodora Alexa-Stratulat
Author Information
  1. Sabinne Marie Taranu: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
  2. Adina Carmen Ilie: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania. ORCID
  3. Ana-Maria Turcu: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
  4. Ramona Stefaniu: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
  5. Ioana Alexandra Sandu: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
  6. Anca Iuliana Pislaru: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
  7. Ioana Dana Alexa: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
  8. Calina Anda Sandu: Department of Medical Specialties II, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
  9. Tudor-Stefan Rotaru: Department of Medical Specialties III, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania. ORCID
  10. Teodora Alexa-Stratulat: Department of Medical Oncology-Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania. ORCID

Abstract

burnout in healthcare professionals remains an ongoing concern. There are a number of variables associated with reactivity to stress in healthcare staff. This study wants to identify risk factors which predispose healthcare professionals to burnout.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cross-sectional study included a group of 200 subjects, medical staff and auxiliary staff from the national health units, who gave their free consent to answer the questions regarding the level of perceived stress at work. The screening tool used was disseminated through the Google Forms platform, maintaining the anonymity of the Participants.
RESULTS: Resident doctors (42%) responded predominantly, reporting the highest level of burnout, with nurses (26.5%) being the least affected (χ = 36.73, < 0.01). Less work experience is correlated with increased burnout (rho = 0.29, < 0.01). Reactivity to stress was highly associated with workplace, with ambulance staff being the most vulnerable (χ = 6.58, < 0.05). Participants' relationship status significantly influenced the burnout rate, the unmarried, with or without a partner, being more affected (χ = 16.14, < 0.01). There are no significant differences between male and female gender, regarding the average level of burnout (U = 1.47; > 0.05), nor between living in a house or apartment (U = 4.66; > 0.05). Positive associations were identified between the level of burnout and variables such as: management pressure, administrative work, routine, regretting decisions regarding patients, harassment at work and sacrifice of personal time.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study identify age, profession, workplace seniority and relationship status as factors associated with burnout in medical personnel.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 21;15(10): [PMID: 30248946]
  2. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Dec;50(6):1264-1275 [PMID: 33025630]
  3. Occup Med (Lond). 2018 May 17;68(3):207-210 [PMID: 29546385]
  4. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013761 [PMID: 32809031]
  5. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015 Oct;45(10):1106-12 [PMID: 26153110]
  6. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Jan;20(1):48-56 [PMID: 27958246]
  7. Med Hypotheses. 2020 Nov;144:109972 [PMID: 32531540]
  8. Stress Health. 2017 Dec;33(5):631-644 [PMID: 28371227]
  9. Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jan;17(1):36-41 [PMID: 30670393]
  10. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1133:97-104 [PMID: 30632115]
  11. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Nov;80(2):127-33 [PMID: 16710712]
  12. Med Arh. 2011;65(4):221-4 [PMID: 21950228]
  13. BMC Nurs. 2019 Nov 21;18:57 [PMID: 31768129]
  14. Hosp Pract (1995). 2019 Dec;47(5):217-220 [PMID: 31674833]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 15;18(14): [PMID: 34300009]
  16. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jun;60(6):567-576 [PMID: 28481850]
  17. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 24;11:235 [PMID: 21943042]
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Mar;103:103493 [PMID: 31884332]
  19. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:199-208 [PMID: 31102930]
  20. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Nov;262 Suppl 2:S65-9 [PMID: 22926058]
  21. Indian J Public Health. 2018 Jan-Mar;62(1):27-31 [PMID: 29512562]
  22. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 29;21(1):514 [PMID: 34587948]
  23. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13 [PMID: 26653297]
  24. Postgrad Med J. 2021 Sep;97(1151):583-589 [PMID: 32796117]
  25. World Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;15(2):103-11 [PMID: 27265691]
  26. Brain Inj. 2012;26(12):1493-9 [PMID: 22725684]
  27. Geriatr Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;42(3):700-707 [PMID: 33831717]
  28. Psychooncology. 2019 Dec;28(12):2365-2373 [PMID: 31518037]
  29. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;968:61-70 [PMID: 28039665]
  30. Can J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;55(3 Suppl 1):7-16 [PMID: 32204885]
  31. Med Sci Monit. 2020 Dec 24;26:e927848 [PMID: 33361745]
  32. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 26;99(26):e20992 [PMID: 32590814]
  33. Mil Med. 2016 Aug;181(8):835-9 [PMID: 27483521]
  34. Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Oct 25;8(11): [PMID: 30366419]
  35. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 26;18(19): [PMID: 34639412]
  36. Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct-Dec;45(5):1236-1244 [PMID: 33090948]
  37. Hum Resour Health. 2013 Sep 28;11:48 [PMID: 24074053]
  38. Iran J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;14(4):309-316 [PMID: 32071605]
  39. Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149 [PMID: 29942800]
  40. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 Nov;52(6):623-633 [PMID: 32862486]
  41. Med Teach. 2019 Dec;41(12):1380-1391 [PMID: 31345077]
  42. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e023506 [PMID: 30782882]
  43. Acad Radiol. 2020 Sep;27(9):1274-1281 [PMID: 32037261]
  44. J Crit Care. 2021 Apr;62:265-270 [PMID: 33477093]
  45. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):229-38 [PMID: 24610185]
  46. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;10(1): [PMID: 35052189]
  47. Postgrad Med J. 2010 May;86(1015):266-71 [PMID: 20448222]
  48. Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Mar 12;70(1):45-51 [PMID: 31860099]
  49. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2015 Oct-Dec;119(4):1128-32 [PMID: 26793859]
  50. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 25;4(2):e004185 [PMID: 24568961]
  51. J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:132-147 [PMID: 30580199]

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Cross-Sectional Studies
Burnout, Professional
Health Personnel
Workplace
Delivery of Health Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0burnout0=healthcarestafflevelwork<professionalsassociatedstressstudyfactorsregardingχ0105BurnoutvariablesidentifymedicalaffectedworkplacerelationshipstatusU>remainsongoingconcernnumberreactivitywantsriskpredisposeMATERIALANDMETHODS:cross-sectionalincludedgroup200subjectsauxiliarynationalhealthunitsgavefreeconsentanswerquestionsperceivedscreeningtooluseddisseminatedGoogleFormsplatformmaintaininganonymityparticipantsRESULTS:Residentdoctors42%respondedpredominantlyreportinghighestnurses265%least3673Lessexperiencecorrelatedincreasedrho29Reactivityhighlyambulancevulnerable658Participants'significantlyinfluencedrateunmarriedwithoutpartner1614significantdifferencesmalefemalegenderaverage147livinghouseapartment466Positiveassociationsidentifiedas:managementpressureadministrativeroutineregrettingdecisionspatientsharassmentsacrificepersonaltimeCONCLUSIONS:resultsageprofessionsenioritypersonnelFactorsAssociatedHealthcareProfessionals

Similar Articles

Cited By (12)