Simple changes to the reporting environment produce a large reduction in the frequency of interruptions to the reporting radiologist: an observational study.

Carina Banziger, Kirsty McNeil, Hui Lu Goh, Samantha Choi, Ian A Zealley
Author Information
  1. Carina Banziger: School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, UK. ORCID
  2. Kirsty McNeil: Department of Radiology, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
  3. Hui Lu Goh: Department of Radiology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
  4. Samantha Choi: Department of Radiology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. ORCID
  5. Ian A Zealley: Department of Radiology, NHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interruptions are a cause of discrepancy, errors, and potential safety incidents in radiology. The sources of radiological error are multifactorial and strategies to reduce error should include measures to reduce interruptions.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of simple changes in the reporting environment on the frequency of interruptions to the reporting radiologist of a hospital radiology department.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out. The number and type of potentially disruptive events (PDEs) to the radiologist reporting inpatient computed tomography (CT) scans were recorded during 20 separate 1-h observation periods during both pre- and post-intervention phases. The interventions were (i) relocation of the radiologist to a private, quiet room, and (ii) initial vetting of clinician enquiries via a separate duty radiologist.
RESULTS: After the intervention there was an 82% reduction in the number of frank interruptions (PDEs that require the radiologist to abandon the reporting task) from a median 6 events per hour to 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4-6;  < 0.00001). The overall number of PDEs was reduced by 56% from a median 11 events per hour to 5 (95% CI = 4.5-11:  < 0.00001).
CONCLUSION: Relocation of inpatient CT reporting to a private, quiet room, coupled with vetting of clinician enquiries via the duty radiologist, resulted in a large reduction in the frequency of interruptions, a frequently cited avoidable source of radiological error.

Keywords

References

  1. Methods Inf Med. 2011;50(5):447-53 [PMID: 21792468]
  2. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;109(5):707-15 [PMID: 22750727]
  3. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):215-26 [PMID: 23294345]
  4. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Aug;27(8):683-9 [PMID: 19923992]
  5. Hum Factors. 2015 Sep;57(6):1051-62 [PMID: 26342062]
  6. Insights Imaging. 2017 Feb;8(1):171-182 [PMID: 27928712]
  7. Hum Factors. 2014 Nov;56(7):1262-71 [PMID: 25490806]
  8. Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1668-76 [PMID: 26466178]
  9. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):12 [PMID: 28275705]
  10. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):683-90 [PMID: 20421552]
  11. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):101-6 [PMID: 26122926]
  12. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2003 Sep;9(3):147-62 [PMID: 14570509]
  13. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jun;11(6):589-93 [PMID: 24775910]
  14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec;199(6):1320-7 [PMID: 23169725]
  15. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):304-12 [PMID: 20378621]
  16. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):399-407 [PMID: 22190539]
  17. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):174-8 [PMID: 16751466]
  18. Acad Radiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1623-8 [PMID: 25281360]
  19. Br J Radiol. 2013 Aug;86(1028):20130245 [PMID: 23833035]
  20. Clin Radiol. 2001 Dec;56(12):938-46 [PMID: 11795921]
  21. Clin Radiol. 2018 Aug;73(8):759.e19-759.e25 [PMID: 29853302]

MeSH Term

Humans
Radiologists
Radiology
Prospective Studies

Chemicals

diethylstilbestrol monophosphate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reportinginterruptionsradiologisterrorfrequencynumbereventsPDEsreductionradiologyradiologicalreducechangesenvironmentobservationalstudyinpatienttomographyCTseparateprivatequietroomvettingclinicianenquiriesviadutymedianperhour95%=< 000001largeBACKGROUND:InterruptionscausediscrepancyerrorspotentialsafetyincidentssourcesmultifactorialstrategiesincludemeasuresPURPOSE:evaluateeffectsimplehospitaldepartmentMATERIALANDMETHODS:prospectivecarriedtypepotentiallydisruptivecomputedscansrecorded201-hobservationperiodspre-post-interventionphasesinterventionsrelocationiiinitialRESULTS:intervention82%frankrequireabandontask61confidenceinterval[CI]4-6overallreduced56%115CI45-11:CONCLUSION:RelocationcoupledresultedfrequentlycitedavoidablesourceSimpleproduceradiologist:Computedreducing

Similar Articles

Cited By