Spirituality is associated with Covid-19 vaccination scepticism.

Natalia Zarzeczna, Tisa Bertlich, Bojana Većkalov, Bastiaan T Rutjens
Author Information
  1. Natalia Zarzeczna: University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: n.j.zarzeczna@uva.nl.
  2. Tisa Bertlich: University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  3. Bojana Većkalov: University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  4. Bastiaan T Rutjens: University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Vaccine scepticism poses a significant global health risk, which has again become clear during the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. Previous research has identified spirituality as an important contributor to general vaccine scepticism. In the present manuscript, we assessed whether self-identified spirituality similarly contributes to scepticism towards Covid-19 vaccines, vaccine uptake, and indecisiveness in intention to be vaccinated. We conducted three studies online in the UK in late 2020, early 2021, and the summer 2021. In Studies 1 and 2 (N = 585), as expected, individuals who strongly identified as spiritual were more sceptical about Covid-19 vaccines. This association was explained by low faith in science, but not by conspiracy beliefs. Importantly, among the vaccinated participants, those who were more spiritual were more indecisive to get a Covid-19 vaccine. Using structural equation modelling (SEM), we further found that spirituality directly predicted lower likelihood of being vaccinated against Covid-19 (Study 3, N = 456). We also identified low science literacy as an additional predictor of Covid-19 scepticism, but not self-reported vaccine uptake. To conclude, spiritual beliefs are an important factor to consider when aiming to increase understanding of vaccine-related science scepticism and vaccination rejection.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471 [PMID: 32355299]
  2. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348 [PMID: 33547453]
  3. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):1171-1181 [PMID: 34177101]
  4. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep;26:100495 [PMID: 32838242]
  5. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 01;10(9):e0132562 [PMID: 26325522]
  6. Science. 2017 Apr 28;356(6336):385 [PMID: 28450603]
  7. Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):977-982 [PMID: 32591957]
  8. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29 [PMID: 33397962]
  9. Lancet. 2020 Sep 26;396(10255):898-908 [PMID: 32919524]
  10. Public Underst Sci. 2022 May;31(4):428-436 [PMID: 34847810]
  11. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207125 [PMID: 30481175]
  12. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):384-405 [PMID: 29191107]
  13. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Aug 04;: [PMID: 35925740]
  14. Am Psychol. 2017 Jul-Aug;72(5):459-473 [PMID: 28726454]
  15. Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;37(4):307-315 [PMID: 29389158]
  16. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 02;8(10):e75637 [PMID: 24098391]
  17. J Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;26(14):2950-2957 [PMID: 32508144]
  18. Public Underst Sci. 2020 Apr;29(3):335-352 [PMID: 32126894]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19 Vaccines
Spirituality
Pandemics
COVID-19
Vaccination
Intention

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Covid-19scepticismvaccinescienceidentifiedspiritualityuptakevaccinatedspiritualimportantvaccines2021lowbeliefsvaccinationSpiritualityVaccinationVaccineposessignificantglobalhealthriskbecomeclearongoingpandemicPreviousresearchcontributorgeneralpresentmanuscriptassessedwhetherself-identifiedsimilarlycontributestowardsindecisivenessintentionconductedthreestudiesonlineUKlate2020earlysummerStudies12N = 585expectedindividualsstronglyscepticalassociationexplainedfaithconspiracyImportantlyamongparticipantsindecisivegetUsingstructuralequationmodellingSEMfounddirectlypredictedlowerlikelihoodStudy3N = 456alsoliteracyadditionalpredictorself-reportedconcludefactorconsideraimingincreaseunderstandingvaccine-relatedrejectionassociatedFaith

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)