Anxiety state impact on recovery of runners with lower extremity injuries.

Aimee Madsen, Sharareh Sharififar, Jordan Oberhaus, Kevin R Vincent, Heather K Vincent
Author Information
  1. Aimee Madsen: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
  2. Sharareh Sharififar: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
  3. Jordan Oberhaus: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
  4. Kevin R Vincent: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
  5. Heather K Vincent: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. ORCID

Abstract

This prospective cohort study examined the impact of high anxiety levels on psychological state and gait performance during recovery in runners with lower body injuries. Recreational runners diagnosed with lower body injuries who had reduced running volume (N = 41) were stratified into groups using State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores: high anxiety (H-Anx; STAI ≥40 points) and low anxiety (L-Anx; STAI <40 points). Runners were followed through rehabilitation to return-to-run using monthly surveys. Main outcome measures included kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK-11), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Positive and negative scores), Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS), running recovery (University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index [UWRI]) and CDC Healthy Days modules for general health, days of anxiety/tension, disrupted sleep and work/usual activities. Running biomechanics were assessed at baseline and the final visit using 3D motion capture and a force-plated treadmill. The time to return-to-running for was 5.0±3.1 and 7.9±4.1 months for L-Anx and H-Anx, respectively and participants who withdrew (n = 15) did so at 7.7±6.2 months. L-Anx maintained low anxiety and H-Anx reduced anxiety from baseline to final visit (STAI = 31.5 to 28.4 points, 50.4 to 37.8 points, respectively), whereas the withdrawn runners remained clinically anxious at their final survey (41.5 to 40.3 points; p < .05). Group by time interactions were found for PANAS positive, LEFS UWRI, general health scores, and days feeling worry, tension and anxiety (all p < .05). Final running performance in L-Anx compared to H-Anx was most improved with cadence (8.6% vs 3.5%; p = .044), impact loading rate [-1.9% vs +8.9%] and lower body stiffness [+14.1% vs +3.2%; all p < .05). High anxiety may identify runners who will experience a longer recovery process, health-related functional disruptions, and less optimization of gait biomechanics during rehabilitation after a lower extremity injury.

References

  1. Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:317-320 [PMID: 29614463]
  2. Gait Posture. 2019 Jun;71:186-191 [PMID: 31075662]
  3. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 May 25;9(5):23259671211011213 [PMID: 34104663]
  4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Oct;49(10):751-760 [PMID: 31378123]
  5. Phys Ther Sport. 2022 Mar;54:36-43 [PMID: 34999561]
  6. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;45(12):1047-52 [PMID: 22059484]
  7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jun;23(6):727-31 [PMID: 1886481]
  8. Sports Med. 2012 Oct 1;42(10):891-905 [PMID: 22827721]
  9. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan 28;4(1):e151-e162 [PMID: 35141547]
  10. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Nov;27(11):1372-1383 [PMID: 27486011]
  11. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun 15;29(12):499-506 [PMID: 33826560]
  12. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 [PMID: 19565683]
  13. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May 22;7(5):2325967119845313 [PMID: 31205965]
  14. J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Feb 11;18(1):21-31 [PMID: 30787648]
  15. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 [PMID: 18929686]
  16. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):200-16 [PMID: 26813750]
  17. J Biomech. 1996 Sep;29(9):1231-3 [PMID: 8872283]
  18. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:25-52 [PMID: 15015911]
  19. Pain. 2005 Sep;117(1-2):137-44 [PMID: 16055269]
  20. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;50(8):476-80 [PMID: 26130697]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70 [PMID: 3397865]
  22. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S467-72 [PMID: 22588767]
  23. J Sport Rehabil. 2014 May;23(2):145-57 [PMID: 24226623]
  24. J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 05;20(2):204-215 [PMID: 33948098]
  25. Physiol Behav. 2016 Mar 15;156:182-90 [PMID: 26812592]
  26. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2013;20(3):164-76 [PMID: 23548735]
  27. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jul;52(7):1563-1575 [PMID: 31977639]
  28. Public Health Rep. 2004 Nov-Dec;119(6):577-84 [PMID: 15504449]
  29. Open Access J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 27;8:205-212 [PMID: 29138604]
  30. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 18;10(1):23259671211066493 [PMID: 35071657]
  31. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Jul;18(6):511-7 [PMID: 12828900]
  32. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 Jun;24(6):714-9 [PMID: 1602945]
  33. Pain. 2007 Sep;131(1-2):181-90 [PMID: 17317011]
  34. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2017 May/Jun;16(3):189-201 [PMID: 28498228]
  35. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Sep;30(9):1692-1704 [PMID: 32421886]
  36. Med Hypotheses. 2011 Aug;77(2):220-2 [PMID: 21550729]
  37. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Jan;53(1):102-107 [PMID: 32769811]
  38. Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Feb 24;4:809465 [PMID: 35280221]
  39. Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;94(11):1614-21 [PMID: 25035265]
  40. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Nov;38(11):2030-4 [PMID: 17095938]
  41. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;50(3):145-8 [PMID: 26719498]
  42. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99877 [PMID: 24923269]
  43. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 May 1;47(16):326-31 [PMID: 9583900]
  44. PeerJ. 2018 Oct 30;6:e5845 [PMID: 30397548]
  45. Addict Behav Rep. 2018 Jun 18;8:33-39 [PMID: 30003135]
  46. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Jul;13(5):393-7 [PMID: 15703963]
  47. J Orthop Res. 1990 May;8(3):383-92 [PMID: 2324857]
  48. Phys Sportsmed. 2020 Nov;48(4):370-377 [PMID: 32186423]
  49. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Aug;49(8):576-583 [PMID: 30759359]
  50. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Mar;51(3):144-150 [PMID: 33356768]
  51. Sports Med. 2015 Jul;45(7):1017-26 [PMID: 25951917]
  52. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010 May-Jun;9(3):176-82 [PMID: 20463502]
  53. PM R. 2022 Jul;14(7):793-801 [PMID: 34053194]
  54. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 18;9(11):23259671211043444 [PMID: 34820458]
  55. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Oct;54(19):1149-1156 [PMID: 32060141]
  56. J Biomech. 1990;23 Suppl 1:65-78 [PMID: 2081746]

MeSH Term

Humans
Prospective Studies
Anxiety Disorders
Anxiety
Bone Plates
Lower Extremity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0anxietyrunnerslowerpointsrecovery=STAIH-AnxL-Anxpimpactbodyinjuriesrunningusingfinal5<05vshighstategaitperformancereduced41AnxietylowrehabilitationScalePositivePANASscoresLEFSRunninggeneralhealthdaysbiomechanicsbaselinevisittime17monthsrespectively483extremityprospectivecohortstudyexaminedlevelspsychologicalRecreationaldiagnosedvolumeNstratifiedgroupsStateTraitInventoryscores:≥40<40Runnersfollowedreturn-to-runmonthlysurveysMainoutcomemeasuresincludedkinesiophobiaTampaKinesiophobiaTSK-11NegativeAffectSchedulenegativeLowerExtremityFunctionUniversityWisconsinInjuryRecoveryIndex[UWRI]CDCHealthyDaysmodulesanxiety/tensiondisruptedsleepwork/usualactivitiesassessed3Dmotioncaptureforce-platedtreadmillreturn-to-running0±39±4participantswithdrewn157±62maintained31285037whereaswithdrawnremainedclinicallyanxioussurvey40GroupinteractionsfoundpositiveUWRIfeelingworrytensionFinalcomparedimprovedcadence6%5%044loadingrate[-19%+89%]stiffness[+141%+32%Highmayidentifywillexperiencelongerprocesshealth-relatedfunctionaldisruptionslessoptimizationinjury

Similar Articles

Cited By