Opioid use after elective spine surgery: Do spine surgery patients consume less than prescribed today?

Lindsay D Orosz, Alexandra E Thomson, Tarek Yamout, Fenil R Bhatt, Brandon Allen, Thomas C Schuler, Rita Roy, Christopher R Good, Colin M Haines, Ehsan Jazini
Author Information
  1. Lindsay D Orosz: National Spine Health Foundation, Reston, VA, United States.
  2. Alexandra E Thomson: Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
  3. Tarek Yamout: Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
  4. Fenil R Bhatt: Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
  5. Brandon Allen: National Spine Health Foundation, Reston, VA, United States.
  6. Thomas C Schuler: Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
  7. Rita Roy: National Spine Health Foundation, Reston, VA, United States.
  8. Christopher R Good: Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
  9. Colin M Haines: Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.
  10. Ehsan Jazini: Virginia Spine Institute, Reston, VA, United States.

Abstract

Background: The opioid epidemic in the US has led prescribers to reevaluate postoperative pain control particularly in the field of spine surgery, where postoperative analgesia requirements and consumption have historically been high. There is a need to mitigate the quantity of unused pills after surgery by adjusting prescribing practices. Achieving the balance of pain control after surgery without overprescribing opioids may be accomplished by developing a modified approach to prescribing practices; however, there is a need to first understand the opioid requirements of the modern spine surgery patient with respect to their elective spine surgery. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to determine the percentage of opioids not utilized at 90-days after elective spine surgery. Secondary aims were to identify differences in the percentage of unused opioids between surgical subgroups and preoperative opioid status, to determine factors associated with opioid utilization, and to estimate the distribution of opioids consumed to control pain up to the 90th percentile in each surgical subgroup.
Methods: In this prospective, observational cohort study, adults undergoing elective spine surgery at a multi-surgeon, single center were prospectively enrolled and divided into subgroups: anterior cervical, lumbar decompression, and short-segment lumbar fusion. Prescribed MMEs were identified from prescriptions, consumed MMEs were obtained from pill counts, and the percent leftover was calculated. Distributions of MMEs consumed were analyzed to compare utilization between preoperative opioid users or non-users within each surgical subgroup.
Results: Of 117 patients, 41.9% were preoperative opioid users. The percentage of unused opioids by surgical subgroup was: 45.4% cervical, 57.3% lumbar decompression, and 37.4% lumbar fusion (=0.066). The percentage of unused opioids by preoperative opioid exposure was greater in the opioid non-users (58.0%) than users (28.4%, <0.001)). Regression analysis showed that surgical subgroup and preoperative opioid exposure were associated with leftover opioids.
Conclusions: At 90-days, the percentage of unused opioids was over 45% in this cohort of elective spine surgery patients and was nearly double in the group without preoperative opioid exposure. These results suggest the modern elective spine surgery patient is using less opioids than prescribed, supporting the conclusion that the number of MMEs prescribed can be reduced to minimize quantities of leftover pills available for diversion, without sacrificing the priority of appropriate postoperative pain control.

Keywords

References

  1. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S226-S230 [PMID: 32173620]
  2. Neurosurgery. 2021 Aug 16;89(3):460-470 [PMID: 34114041]
  3. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Apr 1;28(7):e304-e318 [PMID: 31356424]
  4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 1;39(25):E1524-30 [PMID: 25417827]
  5. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Mar 15;45(6):397-404 [PMID: 31593062]
  6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Nov 4;60(43):1487-92 [PMID: 22048730]
  7. Med Care. 2016 Oct;54(10):901-6 [PMID: 27623005]
  8. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57 [PMID: 26827847]
  9. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun 15;29(12):527-536 [PMID: 33252549]
  10. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):290-297 [PMID: 32191688]
  11. Anesth Analg. 2019 Feb;128(2):358-364 [PMID: 29677062]
  12. Ann Surg. 2018 Sep;268(3):457-468 [PMID: 30004924]
  13. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e047928 [PMID: 34385249]
  14. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Sep 15;27(18):e831-e837 [PMID: 30676516]
  15. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr 1;29(7):e345-e353 [PMID: 32925379]
  16. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 1;44(23):1668-1675 [PMID: 31730572]
  17. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;10(2):117-29 [PMID: 11929206]
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Feb 7;100(3):180-188 [PMID: 29406338]
  19. Global Spine J. 2021 May 21;:21925682211015652 [PMID: 34018420]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgeryopioidspineopioidselectivepreoperativeunusedpercentagesurgicalpaincontrolsubgrouplumbarMMEspostoperativewithoutconsumedleftoveruserspatients4%exposureprescribedrequirementsneedpillsprescribingpracticesmodernpatientstudydetermine90-daysassociatedutilizationcohortcervicaldecompressionfusionnon-userslessOpioidPainBackground:epidemicUSledprescribersreevaluateparticularlyfieldanalgesiaconsumptionhistoricallyhighmitigatequantityadjustingAchievingbalanceoverprescribingmayaccomplisheddevelopingmodifiedapproachhoweverfirstunderstandrespectThereforeprimaryaimutilizedSecondaryaimsidentifydifferencessubgroupsstatusfactorsestimatedistribution90thpercentileMethods:prospectiveobservationaladultsundergoingmulti-surgeonsinglecenterwere prospectivelyenrolleddividedsubgroups:anteriorshort-segmentPrescribedidentifiedprescriptionsobtainedpillcountspercentcalculatedDistributionsanalyzedcomparewithinResults:117419%was:45573%37=0066greater580%28<0001RegressionanalysisshowedConclusions:45%nearlydoublegroupresultssuggestusingsupportingconclusionnumbercanreducedminimizequantitiesavailablediversionsacrificingpriorityappropriateusesurgery:consumetoday?ESROverprescribingmanagementSpine

Similar Articles

Cited By