Prolonged semen incubation alters the biological characteristics of human spermatozoa.

Sayed Abbas Datli Beigi, Mohammad Ali Khalili, Ali Nabi, Mohammad Hosseini, Abolghasem Abbasi Sarcheshmeh, Mojdeh Sabour
Author Information
  1. Sayed Abbas Datli Beigi: Abortion Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
  2. Mohammad Ali Khalili: Department of Reproductive Biology, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
  3. Ali Nabi: Abortion Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
  4. Mohammad Hosseini: Department of Anatomical Sciences, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
  5. Abolghasem Abbasi Sarcheshmeh: Department of Anatomical Sciences, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
  6. Mojdeh Sabour: Andrology Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed the biological characteristics of human spermatozoa at different time intervals (0, 1, 1.5, and 2 hours) after incubation at 37°C.
METHODS: Twenty-five normozoospermic semen samples were incubated at 37°C. Incubation was performed at four time intervals of 0 (after liquefaction), 1, 1.5, and 2 hours. The samples were evaluated for sperm parameters at each time interval.
RESULTS: The rate of sperm progressive motility decreased at 1.5 hours compared to 0 hours as well as 2 hours compared to 1 hour and 0 hours. The rate of non-motile spermatozoa also decreased after 2 hours compared to after 0 hours. No significant changes were observed in sperm viability (p=0.98) and non- progressive motility (p=0.48) at any time intervals. Abnormal sperm morphology increased at 1.5 hours of incubation time (p<0.001). No significant changes were observed in DNA fragmentation at 1 hour compared to 0 hours (median [interquartile range]: 19.5 [4] vs. 19 [4]), as well as at 1.5 hours compared to 1 hour (20 [5]). However, a significant increase in DNA fragmentation was observed at 1.5 hours compared to 0 hours. The mitochondrial membrane potential decreased remarkably after 1 hour of incubation time. No significant differences were observed in the acrosome reaction or malonaldehyde levels at any time point (p=0.34 and p=0.98, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The incubation of normozoospermic samples before use in assisted reproductive technology should be less than 1.5 hours to minimize the destructive effects of prolonged incubation time on general and specific sperm parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrologia. 2018 Feb 14;: [PMID: 29441594]
  2. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016 Apr;14(4):231-40 [PMID: 27351024]
  3. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019 Sep;141:159-171 [PMID: 31212063]
  4. Andrologia. 2021 Feb;53(1):e13581 [PMID: 32323352]
  5. Asian J Androl. 2020 May-Jun;22(3):296-301 [PMID: 31339112]
  6. Andrologia. 2014 May;46(4):374-9 [PMID: 24689689]
  7. Hum Reprod. 2018 May 1;33(5):797-806 [PMID: 29635450]
  8. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Apr 26;13:37 [PMID: 25928197]
  9. Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct - Dec;52(5-6):427-431 [PMID: 30602328]
  10. Asian J Androl. 2012 Nov;14(6):816-21 [PMID: 23001443]
  11. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016 Oct-Dec;9(4):254-258 [PMID: 28216914]
  12. Reprod Sci. 2021 Jul;28(7):1788-1811 [PMID: 33140326]
  13. Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):395-400 [PMID: 16595217]
  14. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1144-7 [PMID: 15802321]
  15. Int Braz J Urol. 2007 May-Jun;33(3):364-74; discussion 375-6 [PMID: 17626653]
  16. Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Aug;8(4):356-365 [PMID: 31555559]
  17. Bio Protoc. 2019 Jan 5;9(1): [PMID: 30687773]
  18. J Reprod Infertil. 2020 Oct-Dec;21(4):275-282 [PMID: 33209744]
  19. Reproduction. 2013 Oct 01;146(5):R163-74 [PMID: 23901129]
  20. Fertil Steril. 2007 Dec;88(6):1589-94 [PMID: 17481619]
  21. Cryobiology. 2017 Jun;76:59-64 [PMID: 28455156]
  22. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013 Mar;36(2):140-6 [PMID: 23809529]
  23. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Apr;28(4):436-42 [PMID: 24581990]
  24. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017 Dec 01;21(4):343-350 [PMID: 29116706]
  25. Andrologia. 2019 Jul;51(6):e13276 [PMID: 30920003]
  26. Andrologia. 2018 Jun;50(5):e12997 [PMID: 29527703]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0hours1time50incubationcomparedsperm2hoursignificantobservedp=0spermatozoaintervalssamplesdecreasedDNAfragmentationbiologicalcharacteristicshuman37°CnormozoospermicsemenIncubationparametersrateprogressivemotilitywellchanges9819[4]membranepotentialreactionOBJECTIVE:presentstudyassesseddifferentMETHODS:Twenty-fiveincubatedperformedfourliquefactionevaluatedintervalRESULTS:non-motilealsoviabilitynon-48Abnormalmorphologyincreasedp<0001median[interquartilerange]:vs20[5]Howeverincreasemitochondrialremarkablydifferencesacrosomemalonaldehydelevelspoint34respectivelyCONCLUSION:useassistedreproductivetechnologylessminimizedestructiveeffectsprolongedgeneralspecificProlongedaltersAcrosomeMitochondrialSpermatozoa

Similar Articles

Cited By