Utilization and out-of-pocket expenses of primary care among the multimorbid elderly in China: A two-part model with nationally representative data.

Yuehua Chen, Wenbin Liu
Author Information
  1. Yuehua Chen: Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  2. Wenbin Liu: Department of Health Management, School of Health Management, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity has become an essential public health issue that threatens human health and leads to an increased disease burden. Primary care is the prevention and management of multimorbidity by providing continuous, comprehensive patient-centered services. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the determinants of primary care utilization and out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) among multimorbid elderly to promote rational utilization of primary care and reduce avoidable economic burdens.
Methods: The study used data from CHARLS 2015 and 2018, which included a total of 4,384 multimorbid elderly aged 60 and above. Guided by Grossman theory, determinants such as education, gender, marriage, household economy, and so on were included in this study. A two-part model was applied to evaluate primary care utilization and OOPE intensity in multimorbid populations. And the robustness testing was performed to verify research results.
Results: Primary care visits rate and OOPE indicated a decline from 2015 to 2018. Concerning primary outpatient care, the elderly who were female ( = 1.51 < 0.001), married ( = 1.24, < 0.05), living in rural areas ( = 1.77, < 0.001) and with poor self-rated health ( = 2.23, < 0.001) had a significantly higher probability of outpatient utilization, whereas those with middle school education ( = 0.61, < 0.001) and better household economy ( = 0.96, < 0.001) had a significantly less likelihood of using outpatient care. Rural patients (β = -0.72, < 0.05) may have lower OOPE, while those with better household economy (β = 0.29, < 0.05; β = 0.58, < 0.05) and poor self-rated health (β = 0.62, < 0.001) occurred higher OOPE. Regarding primary inpatient care, adults who were living in rural areas ( = 1.48, < 0.001), covered by Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) or Urban Rural Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI) ( = 2.46, < 0.001; = 1.81, < 0.001) and with poor self-rated health ( = 2.30, < 0.001) had a significantly higher probability of using inpatient care, whereas individuals who were female ( = 0.74, < 0.001), with middle school education ( = 0.40, < 0.001) and better household economy ( = 0.04, < 0.001) had a significantly lower tendency to use inpatient care. Significantly, more OOPE occurred by individuals who were women (β = 0.18, < 0.05) and with better household economy (β = 0.40, < 0.001; β = 0.62, < 0.001), whereas those who were covered by URBMI (β = -0.25, < 0.05) and satisfied with their health (β = -0.21, < 0.05) had less OOPE.
Conclusion: To prompt primary care visits and reduce economic burden among subgroups, more policy support is in need, such as tilting professional medical staff and funding to rural areas, enhancing awareness of disease prevention among vulnerable groups and so on.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 1;21(1):1287 [PMID: 34210313]
  2. Int Health. 2018 Nov 1;10(6):412-420 [PMID: 30007293]
  3. Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1067-1086 [PMID: 29453763]
  4. Demography. 2011 May;48(2):481-506 [PMID: 21526396]
  5. PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260502 [PMID: 34843566]
  6. Stat Med. 2016 Nov 30;35(27):5070-5093 [PMID: 27500945]
  7. Res Econ Inequal. 2013 Jun;21:263-284 [PMID: 24570580]
  8. Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31(9):1807-1822 [PMID: 35801541]
  9. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 18;172(4):240-247 [PMID: 32016285]
  10. J Chronic Dis. 1970 Dec;23(7):455-68 [PMID: 26309916]
  11. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Jul 01;23:e36 [PMID: 35775363]
  12. J Gen Fam Med. 2019 May 13;20(5):170-179 [PMID: 31516802]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 01;15:737 [PMID: 26231379]
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;190:11-19 [PMID: 28823943]
  15. J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):110-23 [PMID: 20015560]
  16. Gac Sanit. 2010 Sep-Oct;24(5):410-5 [PMID: 20934785]
  17. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):553 [PMID: 32552901]
  18. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):55-65 [PMID: 10686733]
  19. Med Care. 2004 May;42(5):487-91 [PMID: 15083110]
  20. J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jan;71(1):3-23 [PMID: 25113235]
  21. Health Econ. 2004 Apr;13(4):303-14 [PMID: 15067669]
  22. Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2017 Mar;4:283-315 [PMID: 28890906]
  23. J Rural Health. 2015 Spring;31(2):146-56 [PMID: 25219792]
  24. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1:CD006560 [PMID: 33448337]
  25. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;21(1):1380 [PMID: 34253222]
  26. Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 23;9:698030 [PMID: 34631643]
  27. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 1989 Nov;5(11):610-20 [PMID: 2699334]
  28. BMJ. 2012 Oct 04;345:e6341 [PMID: 23036829]
  29. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 03;7(11):e017611 [PMID: 29101139]
  30. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Jul 26;3(2):77-89 [PMID: 25114946]
  31. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006 Mar;50(5):1378-1390 [PMID: 20191094]
  32. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;19(19): [PMID: 36232279]
  33. J Comorb. 2020 Oct 16;10:2235042X20961919 [PMID: 33117722]
  34. BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 16;22(1):425 [PMID: 35570271]
  35. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 08;10(7):e0127199 [PMID: 26154083]
  36. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2494-2523 [PMID: 29945495]
  37. Int J Equity Health. 2020 Apr 3;19(1):49 [PMID: 32245473]
  38. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11): [PMID: 34070687]
  39. Digit Health. 2019 Oct 10;5:2055207619882181 [PMID: 31656632]
  40. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 3;21(1):1046 [PMID: 34600525]
  41. BMJ. 2007 Sep 8;335(7618):475-7 [PMID: 17823186]
  42. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e028575 [PMID: 32193256]
  43. Reprod Health Matters. 2003 May;11(21):16-26 [PMID: 12800700]
  44. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):895 [PMID: 34461884]
  45. Front Public Health. 2019 Feb 15;7:24 [PMID: 30828573]
  46. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jun 01;5(12):693-703 [PMID: 28005549]
  47. Maturitas. 2022 Jan;155:32-39 [PMID: 34876247]
  48. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):981 [PMID: 31856797]
  49. Am Psychol. 1994 Jan;49(1):15-24 [PMID: 8122813]
  50. Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2584-2594 [PMID: 29231837]
  51. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):654 [PMID: 32664947]
  52. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 5;21(1):427 [PMID: 33952273]
  53. Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 11;7:146 [PMID: 31245346]
  54. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):806-810 [PMID: 32222351]
  55. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 07;5(10):e007235 [PMID: 26446164]
  56. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 13;19(10): [PMID: 35627490]
  57. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Oct;126:52-65 [PMID: 28916160]
  58. Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;22(5):661-667 [PMID: 32500244]
  59. Int J Equity Health. 2018 Feb 02;17(1):17 [PMID: 29394933]
  60. Int J Equity Health. 2021 Feb 10;20(1):58 [PMID: 33568126]
  61. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2019 Sep;31(6):510-521 [PMID: 31610715]
  62. Int J Gen Med. 2021 Oct 18;14:6907-6917 [PMID: 34703295]
  63. Health Policy Plan. 2015 Mar;30 Suppl 1:i2-13 [PMID: 25759451]
  64. Health Econ. 2015 May;24(5):601-16 [PMID: 24692342]
  65. Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Sep;29(5):e163-e173 [PMID: 33386777]
  66. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):744 [PMID: 29907132]
  67. Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 29;18(1):166 [PMID: 31665019]
  68. J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010414 [PMID: 28685036]
  69. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):190-197 [PMID: 32556149]
  70. J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):919-32 [PMID: 21893358]
  71. Health Policy Plan. 1998 Sep;13(3):311-22 [PMID: 10187600]
  72. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;17(18): [PMID: 32971840]
  73. Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):959-965 [PMID: 34935300]
  74. BMC Geriatr. 2011 Sep 13;11:54 [PMID: 21914191]
  75. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Sep;22(6):1021-1031 [PMID: 35491846]
  76. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Jun;32(2):99-105 [PMID: 24939741]
  77. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jun;45(4):290-7 [PMID: 22622677]
  78. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 21;9(7):e102149 [PMID: 25048354]
  79. Health Policy. 2019 Apr;123(4):427-434 [PMID: 30791988]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Humans
Female
Male
Multimorbidity
Health Expenditures
China
Ambulatory Care
Primary Health Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00=<001careβprimaryOOPE05healthelderlyhouseholdeconomy1utilizationamongmultimorbidsignificantlybetterstudyout-of-pocketexpenseseducationtwo-partmodeloutpatientruralareaspoorself-rated2higherwhereas-0inpatientdiseaseburdenPrimarypreventionmultimorbiditydeterminantsreduceeconomicdataCHARLS20152018includedtheoryvisitsfemalelivingprobabilitymiddleschoollessusingRurallower62occurredcoveredUrbanBasicMedicalInsuranceURBMIindividuals40Background:Multimorbiditybecomeessentialpublicissuethreatenshumanleadsincreasedmanagementprovidingcontinuouscomprehensivepatient-centeredservicesThereforeaimedinvestigatepromoterationalavoidableburdensMethods:usedtotal4384aged60GuidedGrossmangendermarriageappliedevaluateintensitypopulationsrobustnesstestingperformedverifyresearchresultsResults:rateindicateddeclineConcerning51married2477236196likelihoodpatients72may2958Regardingadults48EmployeeUEBMI4681307404tendencyuseSignificantlywomen1825satisfied21Conclusion:promptsubgroupspolicysupportneedtiltingprofessionalmedicalstafffundingenhancingawarenessvulnerablegroupsonUtilizationChina:nationallyrepresentativegrossman

Similar Articles

Cited By