The association between statin use and osteoarthritis-related outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhan Zhang, Chunbo Deng, Xun Ma, Qijun Wu, Fenghua Zhou, Xueyong Liu
Author Information
  1. Zhan Zhang: Department of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
  2. Chunbo Deng: Department of Orthopedics, Central Hospital of Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
  3. Xun Ma: Department of Rehabilitation, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
  4. Qijun Wu: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
  5. Fenghua Zhou: Department of Rehabilitation, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
  6. Xueyong Liu: Department of Rehabilitation, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Abstract

Findings among studies evaluating the effect of statin use and OA development in a 2020 meta-analysis of data from 11 observational studies of statin use and osteoarthritis (OA) revealed controversial results. We aimed to determine the associations between statin use and OA-related outcomes in an updated meta-analysis. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020163983). A systematic literature retrieval was performed in the online databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, from inception to 1 June 2022, for clinical studies that compared the effects of statin users vs. nonusers on OA-related outcomes risks. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed to estimate the correlations between statin use and OA-related outcomes. Tendency analysis was also used to estimate dose-response effects. The risk of bias was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We included 23 studies involving more than 6,000,000 participants. Statin use was associated with increased OA risk (OR 1.099 [95%CI 1.002-1.206, = 0.045]). Higher statin doses had higher OA risk (simvastatin equivalent daily of >40 mg). OA and related surgery risks were significantly reduced in statin users using antihypertensive drugs (AHDs). No significant differences were seen in other outcomes. This meta-analysis inferred that statin use might be associated with increased OA development, especially at higher doses. The present study highlights the importance of recognizing potential OA risk in the population with long-term and/or high-dose statin use, especially in older populations. In addition, AHDs are associated with lower OA risk and fewer surgeries in hypertensive statin users. Due to limitations of heterogeneity and confounders, more rigorous studies are needed to define the correlations between statin use and OA-related outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 May;12(5):296-302 [PMID: 27080691]
  2. Pharmacol Res. 2020 Apr;154:104201 [PMID: 30877064]
  3. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 May;13(5):302-311 [PMID: 28381830]
  4. Lancet. 2015 Jan 24;385(9965):351-61 [PMID: 25262344]
  5. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Feb;22(2):190-6 [PMID: 24291351]
  6. Stat Med. 2008 Mar 30;27(7):954-70 [PMID: 17676579]
  7. J Rheumatol. 2005 Jan;32(1):106-10 [PMID: 15630734]
  8. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Jun;39(6):1018-1025 [PMID: 31070477]
  9. Drug Saf. 2016 Jun;39(6):543-59 [PMID: 26979831]
  10. Joint Bone Spine. 2011 Jan;78(1):31-4 [PMID: 20471888]
  11. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Apr;35(2):139-51 [PMID: 20456733]
  12. BMJ. 1997 Dec 6;315(7121):1533-7 [PMID: 9432252]
  13. J Clin Med Res. 2017 Jul;9(7):638-649 [PMID: 28611866]
  14. Prog Lipid Res. 2011 Apr;50(2):133-40 [PMID: 21115041]
  15. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 [PMID: 19622552]
  16. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Nov;25(11):1804-1813 [PMID: 28756279]
  17. Cell Metab. 2021 Oct 5;33(10):1911-1925 [PMID: 34562355]
  18. Lancet. 2019 Apr 27;393(10182):1745-1759 [PMID: 31034380]
  19. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):153-160 [PMID: 31563865]
  20. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101 [PMID: 7786990]
  21. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jun 4;23(1):160 [PMID: 34088340]
  22. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 24;67(20):2395-2410 [PMID: 27199064]
  23. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Oct 1;59(10):2898-2907 [PMID: 32097491]
  24. JAMA. 2018 Dec 25;320(24):2564-2579 [PMID: 30575881]
  25. J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(529):163-172 [PMID: 32981992]
  26. Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):655-663 [PMID: 30782341]
  27. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Aug;71(8):1052-1058 [PMID: 30144308]
  28. BMJ. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):219 [PMID: 12543843]
  29. BMC Med. 2018 Nov 12;16(1):205 [PMID: 30415641]
  30. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Jul;25(7):1040-1045 [PMID: 28189828]
  31. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Apr;39(4):669-677 [PMID: 30671597]
  32. Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7743):254-258 [PMID: 30728500]
  33. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Feb;72(2):196-203 [PMID: 23172752]
  34. Pharmacol Res. 2019 Mar;141:85-103 [PMID: 30576798]
  35. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):943-9 [PMID: 23471638]
  36. PLoS Med. 2010 Sep 07;7(9):e1000336 [PMID: 20838658]
  37. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 22;173(14):1-10 [PMID: 23877079]
  38. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Feb;17(2):235-43 [PMID: 18672387]
  39. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 May;71(5):642-7 [PMID: 21989540]
  40. Joint Bone Spine. 2018 Oct;85(5):609-614 [PMID: 29037516]
  41. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17958 [PMID: 31784541]
  42. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 6;352(1):20-8 [PMID: 15635109]
  43. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Dec;70(12):1795-1805 [PMID: 29885074]
  44. J Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;47(3):441-448 [PMID: 30877207]
  45. Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 9;7(1):3147 [PMID: 28600494]
  46. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):127-37 [PMID: 26315393]
  47. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Oct 2;60(10):4624-4632 [PMID: 33502488]
  48. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 May;73(5):943-5 [PMID: 24347568]
  49. Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):396-404 [PMID: 31502936]
  50. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Dec;78(12):1706-1711 [PMID: 31558481]
  51. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;17(3):299-303 [PMID: 24330251]
  52. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29 [PMID: 11106885]
  53. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Sep;28(9):1170-1179 [PMID: 32360737]
  54. BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 8;8(2):e017442 [PMID: 29439066]
  55. JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):568-578 [PMID: 33560326]
  56. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0statinuseOAriskstudiesmeta-analysisoutcomesOA-related1usersassociateddevelopmentosteoarthritisupdatedsystematicperformedeffectsrisksestimatecorrelations000increaseddoseshigherantihypertensivedrugsAHDsespeciallyFindingsamongevaluatingeffect2020data11observationalrevealedcontroversialresultsaimeddetermineassociationsprotocolregisteredPROSPEROCRD42020163983literatureretrievalonlinedatabasesincludingPubMedCochraneLibraryEmbaseWebScienceScopusinceptionJune2022clinicalcomparedvsnonusersSystematicreviewsmeta-analysesTendencyanalysisalsouseddose-responsebiasevaluatedNewcastle-Ottawascaleincluded23involving6participantsStatinOR099[95%CI002-1206=0045]Highersimvastatinequivalentdaily>40 mgrelatedsurgerysignificantlyreducedusingsignificantdifferencesseeninferredmightpresentstudyhighlightsimportancerecognizingpotentialpopulationlong-termand/orhigh-doseolderpopulationsadditionlowerfewersurgerieshypertensiveDuelimitationsheterogeneityconfoundersrigorousneededdefineassociationosteoarthritis-relatedoutcomes:review

Similar Articles

Cited By