Response of physiological characteristics of ecological restoration plants to substrate cement content under exogenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation.

Qian Shu, Dong Xia, Yueyang Ma, Yang Zhang, Ting Luo, Jiaxin Ma, Fang Liu, Shuxing Yan, Daxiang Liu
Author Information
  1. Qian Shu: College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
  2. Dong Xia: College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
  3. Yueyang Ma: Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Slope Habitat Construction Technique Using Cement-based Materials, China Three Gorges University, Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes Chinese, Yichang, China.
  4. Yang Zhang: College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
  5. Ting Luo: Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Slope Habitat Construction Technique Using Cement-based Materials, China Three Gorges University, Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes Chinese, Yichang, China.
  6. Jiaxin Ma: College of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
  7. Fang Liu: Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Slope Habitat Construction Technique Using Cement-based Materials, China Three Gorges University, Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes Chinese, Yichang, China.
  8. Shuxing Yan: Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Slope Habitat Construction Technique Using Cement-based Materials, China Three Gorges University, Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes Chinese, Yichang, China.
  9. Daxiang Liu: Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Slope Habitat Construction Technique Using Cement-based Materials, China Three Gorges University, Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes Chinese, Yichang, China.

Abstract

Introduction: In order to solve the inhibition of alkaline environment on plants growth at the initial stage of Eco-restoration of vegetation concrete technology, introducing AMF into vegetation concrete substrate is an effective solution.
Methods: In this study, (GM), (GI) and a mixture of two AMF (MI) were used as exogenous inoculation agents. and were selected as host plants to explore the relationship between the physiological characteristics of plants and the content of substrate cement under exogenous inoculation of AMF.
Results: The experiment showed that, for , the maximum mycorrhizal infection rates of inoculation with GM, MI were when the cement contents ranged 5-8% and that of GI inoculation was with the cement contents ranging 5-10%. Adversely, for , substrate cement content had little effect on the root system with the exogenous inoculation of AMF. Compared with CK, the effects of AMF inoculation on the physiological characteristics of the two plants were different. When the cement content was the highest (10% and 8% respectively), AMF could significantly increase(<0.05) the intercellular CO concentration (Ci) of . Moreover, for both plants, single inoculation was more effective than mixed inoculation. When the cement content was relatively low, the physiological characteristics of were promoted more obviously by the inoculation of GI. At higher cement content level, inoculation of GM had a better effect on the physiological characteristics of the two plants.
Conclusion: The results suggest that single inoculation of GM should be selected to promote the growth of and in higher alkaline environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Plants (Basel). 2021 May 08;10(5): [PMID: 34066650]
  2. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15;795:148808 [PMID: 34252763]
  3. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 20;783:146968 [PMID: 33865144]
  4. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2008;73(4):711-8 [PMID: 19226818]
  5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Oct;23(20):20719-20727 [PMID: 27473619]
  6. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;599-600:981-991 [PMID: 28505890]
  7. Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(3):3488-97 [PMID: 21112777]
  8. Microb Ecol. 2019 Nov;78(4):904-913 [PMID: 30976842]
  9. J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Feb;130(2):547-560 [PMID: 31310670]
  10. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Apr;149:245-255 [PMID: 32087536]
  11. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Jul 8;41(7):3426-3433 [PMID: 32608917]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 20;16(20): [PMID: 31635157]
  13. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 1;643:1232-1238 [PMID: 30189539]
  14. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 08;12:655060 [PMID: 34168665]
  15. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 27;20(17): [PMID: 31461957]
  16. Environ Microbiol. 2018 Aug;20(8):2854-2864 [PMID: 29687545]
  17. Plants (Basel). 2020 Sep 18;9(9): [PMID: 32961911]
  18. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021 May 29;19(1):79 [PMID: 34052903]
  19. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 08;8:1381 [PMID: 28848583]
  20. Plants (Basel). 2019 Jun 27;8(7): [PMID: 31252515]
  21. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 10;790:148258 [PMID: 34380247]
  22. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Dec 30;186:109744 [PMID: 31627093]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2018 Dec 18;9:3147 [PMID: 30619213]
  24. Chemosphere. 2018 Mar;194:495-503 [PMID: 29241123]
  25. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 20;652:398-405 [PMID: 30366339]
  26. Phytopathology. 2020 May;110(5):999-1009 [PMID: 32096697]
  27. Ecol Evol. 2018 Aug 02;8(17):8652-8664 [PMID: 30271534]
  28. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;634:417-426 [PMID: 29627565]
  29. Ann Bot. 2019 Oct 10;: [PMID: 31599920]
  30. Nat Plants. 2021 Aug;7(8):1108-1118 [PMID: 34226689]
  31. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 14;10(1):2663 [PMID: 32060306]
  32. Front Plant Sci. 2018 Mar 07;9:301 [PMID: 29563923]
  33. Front Microbiol. 2020 Sep 17;11:509919 [PMID: 33042042]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0inoculationcementplantscontentAMFsubstratephysiologicalcharacteristicsGMexogenousvegetationconcreteGItwomycorrhizalalkalineenvironmentgrowtheffectiveMIselectedcontentseffectsinglehigherecologicalrestorationarbuscularIntroduction:ordersolveinhibitioninitialstageEco-restorationtechnologyintroducingsolutionMethods:studymixtureusedagentshostexplorerelationshipResults:experimentshowedmaximuminfectionratesranged5-8%ranging5-10%AdverselylittlerootsystemComparedCKeffectsdifferenthighest10%8%respectivelysignificantlyincrease<005intercellularCOconcentrationCiMoreovermixedrelativelylowpromotedobviouslylevelbetterConclusion:resultssuggestpromoteResponsefungalfungiphotosyntheticphysiology

Similar Articles

Cited By