Correspondence between alcohol use measured by a wrist-worn alcohol biosensor and self-report via ecological momentary assessment over a 2-week period.

Veronica L Richards, Nancy P Barnett, Robert L Cook, Robert F Leeman, Timothy Souza, Stuart Case, Cindy Prins, Christa Cook, Yan Wang
Author Information
  1. Veronica L Richards: Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Profession and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. ORCID
  2. Nancy P Barnett: Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. ORCID
  3. Robert L Cook: Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Profession and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  4. Robert F Leeman: Department of Health Education and Behavior, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. ORCID
  5. Timothy Souza: Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  6. Stuart Case: Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Profession and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  7. Cindy Prins: Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Profession and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  8. Christa Cook: College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  9. Yan Wang: Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Profession and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transdermal alcohol biosensors measure alcohol use continuously, passively, and non-invasively. There is little field research on the Skyn biosensor, a new-generation, wrist-worn transdermal alcohol biosensor, and little evaluation of its sensitivity and specificity and the day-level correspondence between transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) and number of self-reported drinks.
METHODS: Participants (N = 36; 61% male, M  = 34.3) wore the Skyn biosensor and completed ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys about their alcohol use over 2���weeks. A total of 497���days of biosensor and EMA data were collected. Skyn-measured drinking episodes were defined by TAC���>���5�����g/L. Skyn data were compared to self-reported drinking to calculate sensitivity and specificity (for drinking day vs. nondrinking day). Generalized estimating equations models were used to evaluate the correspondence between TAC features (peak TAC and TAC-area under the curve (AUC)) and number of drinks. Individual-level factors (sex, age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, human immunodeficiency virus status, and hazardous drinking) were examined to explore associations with TAC controlling for number of drinks.
RESULTS: Using a minimum TAC threshold of 5�����g/L plus coder review, the biosensor had sensitivity of 54.7% and specificity of 94.6% for distinguishing drinking from nondrinking days. Without coder review, the sensitivity was 78.1% and the specificity was 55.2%. Peak TAC (�� = 0.92, p���<���0.0001) and TAC-AUC (�� = 1.60, p���<���0.0001) were significantly associated with number of drinks. Females had significantly higher TAC levels than males for the same number of drinks.
CONCLUSIONS: Skyn-derived TAC can be used to measure alcohol use under naturalistic drinking conditions, additional research is needed to accurately identify drinking episodes based on Skyn TAC readings.

Keywords

References

  1. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Oct;43(10):2060-2069 [PMID: 31469451]
  2. Heliyon. 2020 Mar 26;6(3):e03612 [PMID: 32258468]
  3. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Nov 1;118(2-3):391-9 [PMID: 21665385]
  4. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Nov;40(7):1112-1121 [PMID: 33174260]
  5. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Oct;20(5):373-81 [PMID: 22708608]
  6. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Sep;45(9):1804-1811 [PMID: 34342009]
  7. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Jan;232(1):115-23 [PMID: 24923985]
  8. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 1;216:108205 [PMID: 32853998]
  9. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804 [PMID: 8329970]
  10. Addict Behav. 2018 Aug;83:56-63 [PMID: 29397211]
  11. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):e37-43 [PMID: 23153129]
  12. Addiction. 2017 Jun;112(6):1025-1035 [PMID: 28107772]
  13. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 May;46(5):783-796 [PMID: 35567595]
  14. Br J Addict. 1989 Nov;84(11):1353-7 [PMID: 2597811]
  15. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Feb;22(1):86-96 [PMID: 24490713]
  16. Alcohol. 2021 May;92:25-34 [PMID: 33609635]
  17. Addict Disord Their Treat. 2015 Sep;14(3):124-130 [PMID: 26500459]
  18. Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):709-13 [PMID: 21949190]
  19. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Mar 1;148:77-84 [PMID: 25582388]
  20. Addiction. 2015 Jan;110(1):1-3 [PMID: 25515824]
  21. Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2912-2920 [PMID: 33908674]
  22. Alcohol. 2019 Dec;81:131-138 [PMID: 30710610]
  23. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Jun;34(6):955-67 [PMID: 20374219]
  24. Alcohol. 2019 Dec;81:101-110 [PMID: 30179708]
  25. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jan;46(1):100-113 [PMID: 35066894]
  26. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:417-424 [PMID: 28709081]
  27. Alcohol. 2023 Jun 7;: [PMID: 37295566]
  28. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Sep 1;142:301-6 [PMID: 25064019]
  29. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Apr;43(4):564-577 [PMID: 30748019]
  30. Addiction. 2003 Dec;98 Suppl 2:73-80 [PMID: 14984244]
  31. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Apr;45(4):864-876 [PMID: 33583057]

Grants

  1. R21 AA027191/NIAAA NIH HHS
  2. T32 DA017629/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Male
Adult
Self Report
Wrist
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Ethanol
Biosensing Techniques
Alcohol Drinking

Chemicals

Ethanol

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0alcoholTACbiosensordrinkingnumberdrinksuseSkynsensitivityspecificitytransdermalecologicalmomentaryassessmentmeasurelittleresearchwrist-worncorrespondenceconcentrationself-reportedEMAdataepisodesdaynondrinkingusedcoderreviewp���<���00001significantlyBACKGROUND:Transdermalbiosensorscontinuouslypassivelynon-invasivelyfieldnew-generationevaluationday-levelMETHODS:ParticipantsN = 3661%maleM = 343worecompletedsurveys2���weekstotal497���dayscollectedSkyn-measureddefinedTAC���>���5�����g/LcomparedcalculatevsGeneralizedestimatingequationsmodelsevaluatefeaturespeakTAC-areacurveAUCIndividual-levelfactorssexagerace/ethnicitybodymassindexhumanimmunodeficiencyvirusstatushazardousexaminedexploreassociationscontrollingRESULTS:Usingminimumthreshold5�����g/Lplus547%946%distinguishingdaysWithout781%552%Peak�� = 092TAC-AUC�� = 160associatedFemaleshigherlevelsmalesCONCLUSIONS:Skyn-derivedcannaturalisticconditionsadditionalneededaccuratelyidentifybasedreadingsCorrespondencemeasuredself-reportvia2-weekperiodreal-time

Similar Articles

Cited By