Does online food shopping boost dietary diversity? Application of an endogenous switching model with a count outcome variable.

Wanglin Ma, Puneet Vatsa, Hongyun Zheng, Yanzhi Guo
Author Information
  1. Wanglin Ma: Department of Global Value Chains and Trade, Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand. ORCID
  2. Puneet Vatsa: Department of Global Value Chains and Trade, Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  3. Hongyun Zheng: College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. ORCID
  4. Yanzhi Guo: Institute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Increasingly, rural households in developing countries are shopping for food online, and the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated this trend. In parallel, dietary guidelines worldwide recommend eating a balanced and healthy diet. With this in mind, this study explores whether online food shopping boosts dietary diversity-defined as the number of distinct food groups consumed-among rural households in China. Because people choose to shop for food online, it is important to account for the self-selection bias inherent in online food shopping. Accordingly, we estimate the treatment effects of online food shopping on dietary diversity using the endogenous switching model with a count outcome variable. The results indicate that online food shopping increases dietary diversity by 7.34%. We also find that education, asset ownership, and knowing the government's dietary guidelines are the main factors driving rural households' decisions to shop for food online.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 14;15(1):e0227873 [PMID: 31935272]
  2. Nutrients. 2020 Apr 10;12(4): [PMID: 32290256]
  3. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0237900 [PMID: 32817693]
  4. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 16;16:39 [PMID: 29176995]
  5. Eur J Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;31(3):608-612 [PMID: 33674837]
  6. J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):3911S-3926S [PMID: 14672290]
  7. Health Econ. 2011 Sep;20(9):1090-109 [PMID: 21830253]
  8. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Oct;44(10):1929-1936 [PMID: 30051541]
  9. Health Econ. 2011 Feb;20(2):184-95 [PMID: 20029821]
  10. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Apr 1;111(4):787-794 [PMID: 31927573]
  11. SN Bus Econ. 2022;2(6):41 [PMID: 35530172]
  12. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Feb;20(2):325-335 [PMID: 27609557]
  13. Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Jan;44:101073 [PMID: 34781070]
  14. J Nutr Metab. 2019 Mar 12;2019:3916864 [PMID: 30993019]
  15. Food Nutr Bull. 2016 Jun;37(2):202-18 [PMID: 26916113]
  16. J Nutr. 2021 Jan 4;151(1):186-196 [PMID: 33244605]
  17. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019 Mar;73(3):395-400 [PMID: 30104730]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:411-420 [PMID: 30530234]
  19. Br J Nutr. 2022 Jul 07;:1-36 [PMID: 35795914]
  20. Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;51(2):790-811 [PMID: 26293167]
  21. Obes Rev. 2021 Jun;22(6):e13174 [PMID: 33615679]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10657-62 [PMID: 26261342]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):988 [PMID: 30089472]
  24. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 16;11:583768 [PMID: 33041952]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodonlineshoppingdietaryruraldiversityswitchinghouseholdsguidelinesChinashopendogenousmodelcountoutcomevariableIncreasinglydevelopingcountriesCOVID-19pandemicacceleratedtrendparallelworldwiderecommendeatingbalancedhealthydietmindstudyexploreswhetherboostsdiversity-definednumberdistinctgroupsconsumed-amongpeoplechooseimportantaccountself-selectionbiasinherentAccordinglyestimatetreatmenteffectsusingresultsindicateincreases734%alsofindeducationassetownershipknowinggovernment'smainfactorsdrivinghouseholds'decisionsboostdiversity?ApplicationDietaryEndogenousOnlineRural

Similar Articles

Cited By