Identifying Modifiable System-Level Barriers to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Shaifali Sandal, Ian Schiller, Nandini Dendukuri, Jorane-Tiana Robert, Khaled Katergi, Ahsan Alam, Marcelo Cantarovich, Julio F Fiore, Rita S Suri, David Landsberg, Catherine Weber, Marie-Chantal Fortin
Author Information
  1. Shaifali Sandal: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  2. Ian Schiller: Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  3. Nandini Dendukuri: Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  4. Jorane-Tiana Robert: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  5. Khaled Katergi: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  6. Ahsan Alam: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  7. Marcelo Cantarovich: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  8. Julio F Fiore: Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  9. Rita S Suri: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  10. David Landsberg: Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  11. Catherine Weber: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  12. Marie-Chantal Fortin: Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Abstract

Introduction: Studying existing health systems with variable living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) performance and understanding factors that drive these differences can inform comprehensive system-level approaches to improve LDKT. We aimed to quantify previously identified barriers and estimate their association with LDKT performance.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health professionals (HPs). Statements, rated on a Likert scale of "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree", captured themes related to communication; role perception; HP's education, training and comfort; attitudes; referral process; patient; as well as resources and infrastructure. The percentage who agreed with these statements was analyzed and compared by LDKT performance (living donation rates higher or lower than the national average) and participant characteristics.
Results: We obtained 353 complete responses. Themes related to poor communication, poor role perception, and HPs education or training or comfort emerged as barriers to LDKT. When compared with HPs from high-performing provinces, those from low-performing provinces had lower odds of agreeing that their province promoted LDKT (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.48). They also had lower odds of initiating discussions about LDKT (aOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.55), and higher odds of agreeing that the transplant team is best suited to discuss LDKT (aOR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.60-4.33) and that more resources would increase LDKT discussions (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.25-3.40). Nonphysician role and less than 10 years of experience were associated with the level of agreement across several themes. Creating guidelines, streamlining evaluations, and improving communication were ranked as priorities to increase LDKT.
Conclusion: There are system-level barriers to LDKT and some were more prevalent in low-performing provinces. Interventions to eliminate them should be implemented in conjunction with patient-level interventions as part of a comprehensive system-level approach to increase LDKT.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Mar;61(3):476-86 [PMID: 23089512]
  2. Transplantation. 2019 Dec;103(12):2566-2575 [PMID: 30946222]
  3. CMAJ. 2016 Apr 19;188(7):487-488 [PMID: 26927970]
  4. J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(2):210-21 [PMID: 24155194]
  5. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 16;18(9):e244 [PMID: 27637296]
  6. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1687-95 [PMID: 25883072]
  7. J Med Ethics. 2005 Apr;31(4):188-91 [PMID: 15800355]
  8. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Mar 24;74(1):e20200392 [PMID: 33787800]
  9. Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):792-805 [PMID: 20337734]
  10. Prog Transplant. 2009 Mar;19(1):18-24 [PMID: 19341059]
  11. JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):49-61 [PMID: 29297077]
  12. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Dec 3;137(11):866-74 [PMID: 12458986]
  13. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2003 Spring;58(2):69-75 [PMID: 12744418]
  14. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Jan 15;4:254 [PMID: 29379784]
  15. Int J Integr Care. 2018 Oct 31;18(4):7 [PMID: 30473645]
  16. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 Feb 26;9:20543581221079486 [PMID: 35237443]
  17. Am J Transplant. 2016 Mar;16(3):877-85 [PMID: 26474298]
  18. Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1675-82 [PMID: 21492157]
  19. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Feb 13;6:2054358119828389 [PMID: 30792874]
  20. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1358-1367 [PMID: 30208398]
  21. BMC Nephrol. 2019 Apr 27;20(1):143 [PMID: 31029107]
  22. JAMA. 2002 Aug 14;288(6):756-64 [PMID: 12169083]
  23. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1678-86 [PMID: 26268509]
  24. Kidney Int Suppl. 2003 Feb;(83):S96-100 [PMID: 12864884]
  25. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1696-702 [PMID: 26002904]
  26. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1084-1091 [PMID: 31965527]
  27. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul;19(4):244-51 [PMID: 22732044]
  28. Eval Health Prof. 2019 Mar;42(1):41-70 [PMID: 30384770]
  29. Kidney Int. 2013 Jan;83(1):138-45 [PMID: 22895516]
  30. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017 Apr 05;4:2054358117698666 [PMID: 28491334]
  31. Int J Care Coord. 2017 Jun;20(1-2):41-44 [PMID: 28690857]
  32. CMAJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;10(2):E348-E356 [PMID: 35440483]
  33. Kidney Int. 2019 Jun;95(6):1453-1460 [PMID: 31010718]
  34. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1670-7 [PMID: 25908792]
  35. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 29;10(9):e037139 [PMID: 32994237]
  36. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1659-69 [PMID: 26116651]
  37. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Sep;27(3):281-91 [PMID: 15870099]
  38. BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 02;6(3):e010605 [PMID: 26936910]
  39. Am J Transplant. 2015 Apr;15(4):914-22 [PMID: 25648884]
  40. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011 Jul;22(4):637-50 [PMID: 21743206]
  41. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253667 [PMID: 34170946]
  42. BMJ. 2004 May 29;328(7451):1312-5 [PMID: 15166072]
  43. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Sep 26;16(1):95 [PMID: 30257678]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LDKThealthbarriers095%livingperformancesystem-levelHPscommunicationrolelowerprovincesoddsaOR =CI:increasedonorkidneytransplantationcomprehensiveprofessionals"stronglythemesrelatedperceptioneducationtrainingcomfortresourcescomparedhigherpoorlow-performingagreeingdiscussions21Introduction:StudyingexistingsystemsvariableunderstandingfactorsdrivedifferencescaninformapproachesimproveaimedquantifypreviouslyidentifiedestimateassociationMethods:conductedcross-sectionalsurveyStatementsratedLikertscaledisagree"agree"capturedHP'sattitudesreferralprocesspatientwellinfrastructurepercentageagreedstatementsanalyzeddonationratesnationalaverageparticipantcharacteristicsResults:obtained353completeresponsesThemesemergedhigh-performingprovincepromotedadjustedoddratio[aOR] =27confidenceinterval[CI]:16-048alsoinitiating3017-055transplantteambestsuiteddiscuss6460-4330625-340Nonphysicianless10yearsexperienceassociatedlevelagreementacrossseveralCreatingguidelinesstreamliningevaluationsimprovingrankedprioritiesConclusion:prevalentInterventionseliminateimplementedconjunctionpatient-levelinterventionspartapproachIdentifyingModifiableSystem-LevelBarriersLivingDonorKidneyTransplantationsystem

Similar Articles

Cited By