ESG ratings, monetary policy uncertainty, and bond issuance premium.

Chunqiang Zhang, Lu Gao, Wenbing Wang, Dayu Hao, Qinwen Wang
Author Information
  1. Chunqiang Zhang: School of Accountancy, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China.
  2. Lu Gao: School of Accountancy, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China.
  3. Wenbing Wang: School of Accountancy, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China.
  4. Dayu Hao: School of Accountancy, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China.
  5. Qinwen Wang: School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China. 120170017@aufe.edu.cn. ORCID

Abstract

Existing studies generally recognize the critical role played by macro monetary policy, of which the uncertainty will increase corporate bond issuance premiums at a micro level. However, relatively little is known about these relationships from the perspective of non-financial information in the corporation. So this study sets out to do further exploration. We use the database to obtain information, including the bond issuance of A-share listed corporations in China from 2015 to 2020. The findings suggest that high environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings from listed corporations significantly weaken the positive correlation between monetary policy uncertainty and bond issuance premiums. Specifically, it has a positive information pricing effect on China's primary debt issuance market, as well as a mitigating impact on macro-financial policy risk. We also find, through further mechanistic studies, that ESG ratings are more helpful in undermining the impact of monetary policy uncertainty on bond issuance premiums in the context of higher financial information quality. Our findings are conducive to enriching the research framework of the economic consequences of ESG ratings, meaningfully influencing the growing literature that exposed the mechanism of bond issuance premiums, and further, verifying the interaction of information at different levels (macro vs micro) in asset pricing.

Keywords

References

  1. Aboud A, Diab A (2019) The financial and market consequences of environmental, social and governance ratings: the implications of recent political volatility in Egypt. Sustain Account Manage Policy J 10:498–520
  2. Auer BR, Schuhmacher F (2016) Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. Q Rev Econ Financ 59:51–62 [DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002]
  3. Badía G, Pina V, Torres L (2019) Financial performance of government bond portfolios based on environmental, social and governance criteria. Sustainability 11:2514 [DOI: 10.3390/su11092514]
  4. Bahra B, Thukral L (2020) ESG in global corporate bonds: the analysis behind the hype. J Portf Manage 46:133–147 [DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2020.1.171]
  5. Bernanke BS, Blinder AS (1988) Credit, money, and aggregate demand. Am Econ Rev 78(2):435–439
  6. Bernanke BS, Gertler M (1995) Inside the black box: the credit channel of monetary policy transmission. J Econ Perspect 9:27–48 [DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.4.27]
  7. Broadstock DC, Chan KL, Cheng LTW, Wang XW (2021) The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Res Lett 38:101716 [DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716]
  8. Caceres C, Unsal DF (2013) Sovereign spreads and contagion risks in Asia. Asian Econ J 27:219–243 [DOI: 10.1111/asej.12012]
  9. Czerwinska T, Kazmierkiewicz P (2015) ESG rating in investment risk analysis of firms listed on the public market in Poland. Econ Notes 44:211–248 [DOI: 10.1111/ecno.12031]
  10. Erragragui E, Revelli C (2016) Is it costly to be both shariah compliant and socially responsible? Rev Financ Econ 31:64–74 [DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2016.08.003]
  11. Feldkircher M, Huber F, Pfarrhofer M (2021) Measuring the effectiveness of US monetary policy during the COVID-19 recession. Scott J Polit Econ 68:287–297 [DOI: 10.1111/sjpe.12275]
  12. Ge W, Liu MZ (2015) Corporate social responsibility and the cost of corporate bonds. J Account Public Policy 34(6):597–624 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.05.008]
  13. Ghouma H, Ben-Nasr H, Yan RQ (2018) Corporate governance and cost of debt financing: empirical evidence from Canada. Q Rev Econ Finance 67:138–148 [DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2017.06.004]
  14. Hachenberg B, Schiereck D (2018) Are green bonds priced differently from conventional bonds? J Asset Manage 19:371–383 [DOI: 10.1057/s41260-018-0088-5]
  15. Ireland PN (2015) Monetary policy, bond risk premia, and the economy. J Monet Econ 76:124–140 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2015.09.003]
  16. Jang GY, Kang HG, Lee JY, Bae K (2020) ESG scores and the credit market. Sustainability 12:3456 [DOI: 10.3390/su12083456]
  17. Kanamura T (2021) Risk mitigation and return resilience for high yield bond ETFs with ESG components. Finance Res Lett 41:101866 [DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101866]
  18. Khan M, Watts RL (2009) Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. J Account Econ 48:132–150 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002]
  19. Lee CC, Wang CW, Ho SJ (2021) Family management and corporate bond spreads: do foreign and government ownerships matter? Emerg Mark Financ Trade 57:4448–4460 [DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1822811]
  20. Nsafoah D, Serletis A (2020) Monetary policy and interest rate spreads. Open Econ Rev 31:707–727 [DOI: 10.1007/s11079-019-09572-4]
  21. Qin J, Ge JT, Lu XS (2018) The effectiveness of the monetary policy in China: new evidence from long-range cross-correlation analysis and the components of multifractality. Phys Stat Mech Its Appl 506:1026–1037 [DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.068]
  22. Ruan L, Liu H (2021) Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: evidence from China. Sustainability 13:767 [DOI: 10.3390/su13020767]
  23. Sensarma R, Bhattacharyya I (2016) The impact of monetary policy on corporate bonds in India. J Policy Model 38:587–602 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2016.03.004]
  24. Talavera O, Tsapin A, Zholud O (2012) Macroeconomic uncertainty and bank lending: the case of Ukraine. Econ Syst 36:279–293 [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.06.005]
  25. Tang Y, Luo Y, Xiong J, Zhao F, Zhang YC (2013) Impact of monetary policy changes on the Chinese monetary and stock markets. Phys Stat Mech Its Appl 392:4435–4449 [DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.05.023]
  26. Valencia F (2017) Aggregate uncertainty and the supply of credit. J Bank Finance 81:150–165 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.05.001]
  27. Xu J, Liu F, Shang Y (2021) R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China. Kybernetes 50:737–756 [DOI: 10.1108/K-12-2019-0793]
  28. Yang YX, Du ZH, Zhang Z, Tong GQ, Zhou RX (2021) Does ESG disclosure affect corporate-bond credit spreads? evidence from China. Sustainability 13:8500 [DOI: 10.3390/su13158500]

Grants

  1. 71702001/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. SK2021A0240/University Research Projects in Anhui Province
  3. GXXT-2021-078/The University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province

MeSH Term

Uncertainty
China
Databases, Factual
Fiscal Policy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0issuancepolicybondinformationESGratingsmonetaryuncertaintypremiumsstudiesmacromicrolistedcorporationsfindingspositivepricingdebtimpactExistinggenerallyrecognizecriticalroleplayedwillincreasecorporatelevelHoweverrelativelylittleknownrelationshipsperspectivenon-financialcorporationstudysetsexplorationusedatabaseobtainincludingA-shareChina20152020suggesthighenvironmentalsocialgovernancesignificantlyweakencorrelationSpecificallyeffectChina'sprimarymarketwellmitigatingmacro-financialriskalsofindmechanistichelpfulunderminingcontexthigherfinancialqualityconduciveenrichingresearchframeworkeconomicconsequencesmeaningfullyinfluencinggrowingliteratureexposedmechanismverifyinginteractiondifferentlevelsvsassetpremiumCarbonneutralityCostfinancingInformationasymmetryMonetarySustainabledevelopment

Similar Articles

Cited By