Psychometric properties of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale: An analysis using item response theory.

Daniel Zarate, Ben A Hobson, Evita March, Mark D Griffiths, Vasileios Stavropoulos
Author Information
  1. Daniel Zarate: Victoria University, Australia.
  2. Ben A Hobson: Victoria University, Australia.
  3. Evita March: Federation University, Australia.
  4. Mark D Griffiths: International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, UK.
  5. Vasileios Stavropoulos: Victoria University, Australia.

Abstract

Background: Social media use has become an everyday behavior in contemporary life resulting in increased participation. A minority of individuals, especially younger adults, may engage excessively with the medium, resulting in the emergence of problematic social media use (PSMU). One way of assessing PSMU is by administering the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS). The present study investigated the psychometric properties and prevalence of the BSMAS using Item Response Theory (IRT). Additionally, it evaluated risk factors such as gender and age.
Methods: A relatively large community sample (N = 968,  = 29.5 years,  = 9.36, 32.5% women) completed the BSMAS online.
Results: IRT analyses showed differences regarding the BSMAS items' discrimination, difficulty, and reliability capacities, with a raw score exceeding 26 (out of 30) indicating a higher risk of PSMU (n = 11; 1.1%). Females and younger participants were at greater risk of developing PSMU.
Conclusion: The BSMAS functions as a reliable measure of PSMU, particularly between average to high levels of the trait. Additionally, younger participants were shown to be at higher risk of PSMU suggesting that prevention and intervention protocols should focus on this group.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;10(1):31 [PMID: 35183262]
  2. Addict Behav Rep. 2022 Jan 06;15:100406 [PMID: 35434247]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Sep;8(9):3528-52 [PMID: 22016701]
  4. BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 30;9(1):114 [PMID: 34330338]
  5. Heliyon. 2022 Jul 14;8(7):e09929 [PMID: 35874067]
  6. Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;101:105960 [PMID: 31072648]
  7. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169839 [PMID: 28068404]
  8. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2018;16(2):377-392 [PMID: 29670499]
  9. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Dec;25(12):793-801 [PMID: 36315236]
  10. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022 Jan 15;:1-18 [PMID: 35069045]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 14;18(6): [PMID: 33799401]
  12. Addict Behav. 2021 Jun;117:106845 [PMID: 33550200]
  13. J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):620-629 [PMID: 29130330]
  14. Addict Behav Rep. 2022 Aug 12;16:100449 [PMID: 36034971]
  15. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Mar;30(2):252-62 [PMID: 26999354]
  16. J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):697-706 [PMID: 30264607]
  17. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022 Jun 20;:1-19 [PMID: 35754859]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PSMUBSMASSocialmediariskuseyoungerresultingsocialBergenMediaAddictionpropertiesusingItemIRTAdditionallyhigherparticipantsanalysisresponsetheoryBackground:becomeeverydaybehaviorcontemporarylifeincreasedparticipationminorityindividualsespeciallyadultsmayengageexcessivelymediumemergenceproblematicOnewayassessingadministeringScalepresentstudyinvestigatedpsychometricprevalenceResponseTheoryevaluatedfactorsgenderageMethods:relativelylargecommunitysampleN = 968 = 295 years = 936325%womencompletedonlineResults:analysesshoweddifferencesregardingitems'discriminationdifficultyreliabilitycapacitiesrawscoreexceeding2630indicatingn = 1111%FemalesgreaterdevelopingConclusion:functionsreliablemeasureparticularlyaveragehighlevelstraitshownsuggestingpreventioninterventionprotocolsfocusgroupPsychometricScale:itemConfirmatoryfactorProblematicPsychometricsaddiction

Similar Articles

Cited By