Examining the effects of psychological reactance on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: Comparison of two countries.

Fahimeh Hateftabar, Heidi J Larson, Vahideh Hateftabar
Author Information
  1. Fahimeh Hateftabar: Management Department, University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, Paris, France.
  2. Heidi J Larson: Anthropology, Risk and Decision Science, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  3. Vahideh Hateftabar: Department of ENT, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Background: Despite the public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines being necessary to achieve ample immunization rates and, in turn, put an end to the global pandemic, vaccine hesitancy and refusal are on the rise. To detect and address the concerns of those who are hesitant, it is critical to identify all potential factors behind vaccine decision-making in order to devise strategies to enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake.
Methods: We retrieved a total of 742 and 685 completed questionnaires from Iran and France, respectively; after initial cleaning and data screening, the number of usable questionnaires dropped to 714 and 664. We evaluate the distinct vaccination and lockdown restrictions in Iran and France and used multi-group analysis to evaluate structural path models of French and Iranian people, revealing a significant difference between the two groups in vaccination-related decisions. This empirical study is one of the first to employ the measurement invariance was evaluated using the measurement invariance for composite (MICOM) approach in testing partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) measurement invariance and one of the first to use both Henseler's MGA and Henseler's permutation method to perform multi-group analysis (MGA).
Results: MGA revealed significant differences in the effects of influential factors on vaccine acceptance across France and Iran. In other words, many determining factors are likely to be context-dependent. The study revealed that reactance (due to restrictions and perceived scarcity) and financial strain significantly influenced COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake among Iranians; however, among the French, confidence, and convenience were far more influential.
Conclusions: These cross-cultural differences point to the importance of conducting additional research in this area that directly compares various effects across countries. Each country's public health authorities and policymakers could use these insights to develop more targeted strategies and, in turn, boost vaccination rates among the public.

References

  1. Vaccine. 2014 Nov 20;32(49):6649-54 [PMID: 25280436]
  2. Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1385-1394 [PMID: 34272499]
  3. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4 [PMID: 25896383]
  4. Health Commun. 2006;19(3):241-52 [PMID: 16719727]
  5. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Apr;7(4):419-25 [PMID: 21389777]
  6. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025594 [PMID: 33079199]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Jul;57(1):16-26 [PMID: 2754601]
  8. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Oct 3;17(10):3421-3432 [PMID: 34292140]
  9. Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e210-e221 [PMID: 33556325]
  10. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:175-191 [PMID: 33798403]
  11. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):775-779 [PMID: 32785815]
  12. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;35(4):325-330 [PMID: 32318915]
  13. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 03;9(2): [PMID: 33546165]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 7;17(1):872 [PMID: 29115958]
  15. Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 30;9(1): [PMID: 33396832]
  16. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jul 3;14(7):1618-1625 [PMID: 29771633]
  17. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228 [PMID: 33082575]
  18. Psychol Med. 2020 Oct 19;:1-3 [PMID: 33070804]
  19. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0208601 [PMID: 30532274]
  20. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(3):628-42 [PMID: 16039769]
  21. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113414 [PMID: 33038683]
  22. Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 13;9:735 [PMID: 29951010]
  23. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):e0172310 [PMID: 28249006]
  24. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 20;9(2):e89177 [PMID: 24586574]
  25. Z Psychol. 2015;223(4):205-214 [PMID: 27453805]
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):331-333 [PMID: 33618982]
  27. Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):1023-1034 [PMID: 33587887]
  28. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  29. EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:295-301 [PMID: 27658738]
  30. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1981-8 [PMID: 19420367]
  31. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102934 [PMID: 36540679]
  32. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005 Dec;26(6):441-52 [PMID: 16344662]
  33. Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;13(5):481-8 [PMID: 24011751]
  34. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29 [PMID: 33397962]
  35. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19381 [PMID: 21602931]
  36. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jun 18;10(6): [PMID: 35746581]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19 Vaccines
Iran
COVID-19
Communicable Disease Control
Vaccination

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccineacceptancepublicCOVID-19factorsIranFrancemeasurementinvarianceMGAeffectsamongratesturnstrategiesuptakequestionnairesevaluatevaccinationrestrictionsmulti-groupanalysisFrenchsignificanttwostudyonefirstuseHenseler'srevealeddifferencesinfluentialacrossreactancecountriesBackground:Despitevaccinesnecessaryachieveampleimmunizationputendglobalpandemichesitancyrefusalrisedetectaddressconcernshesitantcriticalidentifypotentialbehinddecision-makingorderdeviseenhanceMethods:retrievedtotal742685completedrespectivelyinitialcleaningdatascreeningnumberusabledropped714664distinctlockdownusedstructuralpathmodelsIranianpeoplerevealingdifferencegroupsvaccination-relateddecisionsempiricalemployevaluatedusingcompositeMICOMapproachtestingpartialleastsquares-structuralequationmodellingPLS-SEMpermutationmethodperformResults:wordsmanydetermininglikelycontext-dependentdueperceivedscarcityfinancialstrainsignificantlyinfluencedIranianshoweverconfidenceconveniencefarConclusions:cross-culturalpointimportanceconductingadditionalresearchareadirectlycomparesvariouscountry'shealthauthoritiespolicymakersinsightsdeveloptargetedboostExaminingpsychologicalacceptance:Comparison

Similar Articles

Cited By