Culture, COVID-19, and collectivism: A paradox of American exceptionalism?

Gregory D Webster, Jennifer L Howell, Joy E Losee, Elizabeth A Mahar, Val Wongsomboon
Author Information
  1. Gregory D Webster: Department of Psychology, University of Florida, USA.
  2. Jennifer L Howell: Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, USA.
  3. Joy E Losee: Department of Psychology, University of Dayton, USA.
  4. Elizabeth A Mahar: Department of Psychology, University of Florida, USA.
  5. Val Wongsomboon: Department of Psychology, University of Florida, USA.

Abstract

Do geographic differences in collectivism relate to COVID-19 case and death rates? And if so, would they also replicate across states within arguably the most individualistic country in the world-the United States? Further still, what role might the U.S.'s history of ethnic strife and race-based health disparities play in either reinforcing or undermining state-level relations between collectivism and COVID-19 rates? To answer these questions, we examined archival data from 98 countries (Study 1) and the 48 contiguous United States (Study 2) on country/state-level collectivism, COVID-19 case/death rates, relevant covariates (per-capita GDP, population density, spatial dependence), and in the U.S., percent of non-Whites. In Study 1, country-level collectivism related to both cases ( = -0.28) and deaths ( = -0.40) in simple regressions; however, after controlling for covariates, the former became non-significant (  = -0.07), but the latter remained significant (  = -0.20). In Study 2, state-level collectivism related to both cases ( = 0.56) and deaths ( = 0.41) in simple regressions, and these relationships persisted after controlling for all covariates except race, where a state's non-White population dominated all other predictors of COVID-19 cases (  = 0.35) and deaths (  = 0.31). We discuss the strong link between race and collectivism in U.S. culture, and its implications for understanding COVID-19 responses.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471 [PMID: 32355299]
  2. Cogn Emot. 2012;26(4):634-49 [PMID: 21827331]
  3. Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):173-81 [PMID: 11523746]
  4. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;23(3):207-237 [PMID: 29616588]
  5. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug;67(3):478-86 [PMID: 18508171]
  6. Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 12;4:513 [PMID: 23964259]
  7. Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Dec 1;167:110232 [PMID: 32834282]
  8. JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2129-2130 [PMID: 32324202]
  9. Am Psychol. 2000 Jul;55(7):709-20 [PMID: 10916861]
  10. Psychol Bull. 1993 Sep;114(2):376-90 [PMID: 8416037]
  11. Sci Adv. 2020 Aug 05;6(32):eabc1463 [PMID: 32923613]
  12. Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72 [PMID: 11843547]
  13. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021 Jul;12(5):697-707 [PMID: 38602980]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jun;72(6):1245-67 [PMID: 9177018]
  15. Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):556-76 [PMID: 26511288]
  16. Am Psychol. 2010 Sep;65(6):548-58 [PMID: 20822196]
  17. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016938 [PMID: 32721027]
  18. Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):663-673 [PMID: 32592420]
  19. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:219-229 [PMID: 28532892]
  20. Am Psychol. 2020 Jul-Aug;75(5):618-630 [PMID: 32496074]
  21. Psychol Sci. 2020 Oct;31(10):1236-1244 [PMID: 32915703]
  22. J Res Pers. 2018 Feb;72:64-72 [PMID: 32831424]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 17;17(10): [PMID: 32429536]
  24. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 7;275(1640):1279-85 [PMID: 18302996]
  25. Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;27(7):935-44 [PMID: 27207872]
  26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):75-90 [PMID: 18179319]
  27. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:316-26 [PMID: 25577953]
  28. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118 [PMID: 38602949]
  29. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;37(11):1474-87 [PMID: 21734164]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0collectivismCOVID-19Study = -0 = 0UScovariatescasesdeathsrates?Unitedhealthdisparitiesstate-level12populationrelatedsimpleregressionscontrollingraceCulturegeographicdifferencesrelatecasedeathalsoreplicateacrossstateswithinarguablyindividualisticcountryworld-theStates?stillrolemight'shistoryethnicstriferace-basedplayeitherreinforcingunderminingrelationsanswerquestionsexaminedarchivaldata98countries48contiguousStatescountry/state-levelcase/deathratesrelevantper-capitaGDPdensityspatialdependencepercentnon-Whitescountry-level2840howeverformerbecamenon-significant07latterremainedsignificant205641relationshipspersistedexceptstate'snon-Whitedominatedpredictors3531discussstronglinkcultureimplicationsunderstandingresponsescollectivism:paradoxAmericanexceptionalism?COVID-19CollectivismIndividualismRacial

Similar Articles

Cited By