3D Fabrication and Characterisation of Electrically Receptive PCL-Graphene Scaffolds for Bioengineered In Vitro Tissue Models.

Mary Josephine McIvor, Fionn Ó Maolmhuaidh, Aidan Meenagh, Shahzad Hussain, Gourav Bhattacharya, Sam Fishlock, Joanna Ward, Aoife McFerran, Jonathan G Acheson, Paul A Cahill, Robert Forster, David J McEneaney, Adrian R Boyd, Brian J Meenan
Author Information
  1. Mary Josephine McIvor: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK. ORCID
  2. Fionn Ó Maolmhuaidh: The National Centre for Sensor Research, School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. ORCID
  3. Aidan Meenagh: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK.
  4. Shahzad Hussain: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK. ORCID
  5. Gourav Bhattacharya: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK.
  6. Sam Fishlock: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK. ORCID
  7. Joanna Ward: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK. ORCID
  8. Aoife McFerran: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK.
  9. Jonathan G Acheson: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK. ORCID
  10. Paul A Cahill: School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. ORCID
  11. Robert Forster: The National Centre for Sensor Research, School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
  12. David J McEneaney: Cardiovascular Research Unit, Craigavon Area Hospital, 68 Lurgan Road, Portadown, Co., Armagh BT63 5QQ, UK.
  13. Adrian R Boyd: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK. ORCID
  14. Brian J Meenan: Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering, Ulster University, 2-24 York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a well-established biomaterial, offering extensive mechanical attributes along with low cost, biocompatibility, and biodegradability; however, it lacks hydrophilicity, bioactivity, and electrical conductivity. Advances in 3D fabrication technologies allow for these sought-after attributes to be incorporated into the scaffolds during fabrication. In this study, solvent-free Fused Deposition Modelling was employed to fabricate 3D scaffolds from PCL with increasing amounts of graphene (G), in the concentrations of 0.75, 1.5, 3, and 6% (/). The PCL+G scaffolds created were characterised physico-chemically, electrically, and biologically. Raman spectroscopy demonstrated that the scaffold outer surface contained both PCL and G, with the G component relatively uniformly distributed. Water contact angle measurement demonstrated that as the amount of G in the scaffold increases (0.75-6% /), hydrophobicity decreases; mean contact angle for pure PCL was recorded as 107.22 ± 9.39°, and that with 6% G (PCL+6G) as 77.56 ± 6.75°. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy demonstrated a marked increase in electroactivity potential with increasing G concentration. Cell viability results indicated that even the smallest addition of G (0.75%) resulted in a significant improvement in electroactivity potential and bioactivity compared with that for pure PCL, with 1.5 and 3% exhibiting the highest statistically significant increases in cell proliferation.

Keywords

References

  1. Membranes (Basel). 2020 Jul 22;10(8): [PMID: 32708027]
  2. RSC Adv. 2018 Nov 22;8(68):39106-39114 [PMID: 35558295]
  3. Materials (Basel). 2016 Dec 07;9(12): [PMID: 28774112]
  4. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22210 [PMID: 33335152]
  5. Polymer (Guildf). 2017 May;117:1-10 [PMID: 28824207]
  6. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Feb 1;19(5):3756-3762 [PMID: 28098275]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 17;95(6):2979-84 [PMID: 9501201]
  8. Glob Chall. 2018 Oct 25;3(2):1800066 [PMID: 31565359]
  9. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;14(9): [PMID: 35566838]
  10. Prog Polym Sci. 2018 Jun;81:144-162 [PMID: 29983457]
  11. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Nov 26;7:346 [PMID: 32039166]
  12. Eng Life Sci. 2019 Aug 12;19(10):658-665 [PMID: 32624959]
  13. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Feb 01;13(2): [PMID: 33535563]
  14. J Biol Eng. 2019 Jun 28;13:57 [PMID: 31297148]
  15. 3D Print Med. 2021 Mar 22;7(1):8 [PMID: 33751279]
  16. Materials (Basel). 2016 Nov 04;9(11): [PMID: 28774016]
  17. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Dec;100:103387 [PMID: 31394432]
  18. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018 Nov;106(11):2923-2933 [PMID: 30325093]
  19. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2019 Aug 1;6(4):234 [PMID: 31479503]
  20. Biomaterials. 2019 Apr;198:3-26 [PMID: 30343824]
  21. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;12(10): [PMID: 32998365]
  22. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015 Feb 11;7(5):3237-52 [PMID: 25584679]
  23. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Mar;286(3):H823-9 [PMID: 14766671]
  24. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Sep 5;41(3):422-30 [PMID: 9659612]
  25. Bioact Mater. 2020 Nov 10;6(5):1388-1401 [PMID: 33210031]

Grants

  1. INTERREG VA Programme/European Union

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0GPCL3Dbioactivityfabricationscaffolds0demonstratedelectroactivityattributesincreasinggraphene156%/scaffoldcontactangleincreasespure±potentialsignificantPolycaprolactonewell-establishedbiomaterialofferingextensivemechanicalalonglowcostbiocompatibilitybiodegradabilityhoweverlackshydrophilicityelectricalconductivityAdvancestechnologiesallowsought-afterincorporatedstudysolvent-freeFusedDepositionModellingemployedfabricateamountsconcentrations753PCL+Gcreatedcharacterisedphysico-chemicallyelectricallybiologicallyRamanspectroscopyoutersurfacecontainedcomponentrelativelyuniformlydistributedWatermeasurementamount75-6%hydrophobicitydecreasesmeanrecorded10722939°PCL+6G7756675°ElectrochemicalImpedanceSpectroscopymarkedincreaseconcentrationCellviabilityresultsindicatedevensmallestaddition75%resultedimprovementcompared3%exhibitinghigheststatisticallycellproliferationFabricationCharacterisationElectricallyReceptivePCL-GrapheneScaffoldsBioengineeredVitroTissueModelsfuseddepositionmodellingpolycaprolactone

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)