The relationship between subconstructs of empathy and general cognitive ability in the context of policing.

Miguel Inzunza, Gavin T L Brown, Tova Stenlund, Christina Wikström
Author Information
  1. Miguel Inzunza: Police Education Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  2. Gavin T L Brown: Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  3. Tova Stenlund: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  4. Christina Wikström: Department of Applied Educational Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.

Abstract

Purpose: empathy has been widely theorized as an important ability in professions such as policing, in which to perform well individuals require multiple and interacting abilities, not least when resolving conflict situations. Even so, there are few studies investigating how subconstructs of empathy relate to other constructs such as general cognitive ability. The purpose of this paper is to establish, after evaluating psychometric properties, relationships among measures of empathy and cognitive ability in a sample of Swedish police students ( = 157).
Design/methodology/approach: Multiple latent variable models of how the different measures work to predict tasks that can be seen as proxies for the ability to understand another person's situation and intentions are evaluated to determine the most robust relationship(s) within the data.
Findings: We find support for the psychometric properties reported in previous studies with the used instruments. We also find support for perspective-taking, a cognitive empathy subconstruct predicting the ability to recognize emotions, and also the affective part of empathy, predicting general cognitive ability. These findings are discussed at length in the paper.
Originality/value: This research adds more knowledge to the issue of how general cognitive ability relates to cognitive empathy and other subconstructs of empathy or Theory of Mind.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):673-9 [PMID: 21037165]
  2. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(5):523-6 [PMID: 12559146]
  3. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0136521 [PMID: 26313946]
  4. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2013 Jul;18(4):326-54 [PMID: 23106125]
  5. Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):404-31 [PMID: 2381998]
  6. Psychol Assess. 2019 Aug;31(8):1062-1072 [PMID: 31120296]
  7. Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):58-72 [PMID: 22229774]
  8. J Adolesc. 2006 Aug;29(4):589-611 [PMID: 16198409]
  9. Ann Surg. 1995 Dec;222(6):735-42 [PMID: 8526580]
  10. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51 [PMID: 11280420]
  11. Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Nov 1;86:6-14 [PMID: 26543298]
  12. Scand J Psychol. 2014 Oct;55(5):399-408 [PMID: 25040205]
  13. Mol Autism. 2013 Sep 11;4(1):33 [PMID: 24020728]
  14. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):855-63 [PMID: 16904182]
  15. Psych J. 2020 Feb;9(1):34-43 [PMID: 31394592]
  16. J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan 2;162(1):143-160 [PMID: 35083952]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0abilitycognitiveempathygeneralsubconstructspolicingstudiespaperpsychometricpropertiesmeasureslatentvariablerelationshipfindsupportalsopredictingPurpose:EmpathywidelytheorizedimportantprofessionsperformwellindividualsrequiremultipleinteractingabilitiesleastresolvingconflictsituationsEveninvestigatingrelateconstructspurposeestablishevaluatingrelationshipsamongsampleSwedishpolicestudents = 157Design/methodology/approach:Multiplemodelsdifferentworkpredicttaskscanseenproxiesunderstandanotherperson'ssituationintentionsevaluateddeterminerobustswithindataFindings:reportedprevioususedinstrumentsperspective-takingsubconstructrecognizeemotionsaffectivepartfindingsdiscussedlengthOriginality/value:researchaddsknowledgeissuerelatesTheoryMindcontextmodel

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.