Economic hardship, ontological insecurity, and household food waste.

Neda Ghafoorifard, Rhiannon MacDonnell Mesler, Michael Basil
Author Information
  1. Neda Ghafoorifard: Institute for Consumer and Social Well-Being, Dhillon School of Business, University of Lethbridge - Calgary Campus, Suite S6032, 345 - 6th Avenue SE, Calgary, AB T2G 4V1, Canada.
  2. Rhiannon MacDonnell Mesler: Institute for Consumer and Social Well-Being, Dhillon School of Business, University of Lethbridge - Calgary Campus, Suite S6032, 345 - 6th Avenue SE, Calgary, AB T2G 4V1, Canada.
  3. Michael Basil: Institute for Consumer and Social Well-Being, Dhillon School of Business, University of Lethbridge - Lethbridge Campus, Markin Hall, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada.

Abstract

The experience of a downward change in one's financial situation is so common that most consumers will experience it during their lifetime, and this prevalence has been compounded by the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Limited research, however, has examined the impact of economic hardship on consumers' food-related behavior. Using a sample of Canadians and Americans (n = 519; M = 38.4; SD = 13.6; 46.2% female; 85% lived alone), we identify that economic hardship significantly and negatively predicts consumer food waste behavior, such that economic hardship leads consumers to waste less food. Conversely, we also identify a positive indirect effect wherein economic hardship positively predicts ontological insecurity (i.e., the aversive feeling of being overwhelmed and out of control), which in turn positively predicts overconsumption (e.g., overstocking one's fridge or pantry) and in turn predicts higher food waste. This preliminary work opens the door to future work exploring a potentially rich avenue of research on the implications of adverse economic events on consumer food choice, consumption, and disposal. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. MethodsX. 2019 Oct 31;6:2767-2775 [PMID: 31832348]
  2. J Clin Psychol. 2020 Mar;76(3):423-439 [PMID: 31476249]
  3. Food Qual Prefer. 2021 Sep;92:104220 [PMID: 36567730]
  4. Food Qual Prefer. 2021 Apr;89:104145 [PMID: 33250586]
  5. Waste Manag. 2017 Sep;67:298-307 [PMID: 28511926]
  6. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  7. Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105191 [PMID: 33667497]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0economichardshipfoodwastepredictsresearchexperienceone'sconsumersbehavioridentifyconsumerpositivelyontologicalinsecurityeturnworkFooddownwardchangefinancialsituationcommonwilllifetimeprevalencecompoundedrecentCOVID-19pandemicLimitedhoweverexaminedimpactconsumers'food-relatedUsingsampleCanadiansAmericansn = 519M = 384SD = 136462%female85%livedalonesignificantlynegativelyleadslessConverselyalsopositiveindirecteffectwhereiniaversivefeelingoverwhelmedcontroloverconsumptiongoverstockingfridgepantryhigherpreliminaryopensdoorfutureexploringpotentiallyrichavenueimplicationsadverseeventschoiceconsumptiondisposalImplicationspracticediscussedEconomichouseholdpreferenceOver-purchasingOverconsumptionScarcity

Similar Articles

Cited By