Effects of chronic bubble tea administration on behavior and cognition in C57BL/6 mice.

Yitan Yao, Shengya Shi, Yating Yang, Bei Luo, Mengdie Li, Ling Zhang, Xiaoping Yuan, Huanzhong Liu, Kai Zhang
Author Information
  1. Yitan Yao: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  2. Shengya Shi: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  3. Yating Yang: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  4. Bei Luo: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  5. Mengdie Li: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  6. Ling Zhang: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  7. Xiaoping Yuan: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  8. Huanzhong Liu: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  9. Kai Zhang: Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Abstract

Purpose: There is a lack of rigorous experimental evidence to verify the effects of bubble tea on body weight and mental health, especially whether it is an addictive thing.
Materials and methods: Male adult C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to two groups, including the bubble-tea and the control group. The change in their body weight was calculated. Behavior tests include novel object recognition test (NORT), elevated plus maze test (EPMT), forced swim test (FST), tail suspension test (TST), conditioned place preference (CPP).
Results: There was a significant time effect on weight change of the two groups ( = 36.83, < 0.01). The bubble tea-treated mice spent significantly less time in the open arms, indicating an increase in anxiety ( = 2.39, = 0.03). In FST, bubble tea treatment produced a significantly increased immobility time (186.58 ± 29.67 s) as compared to pure water treated group (112.50 ± 46.67 s) ( = -3.79, < 0.01). Similarly, the immobility time in the TST was also significantly increased by bubble tea treatment (437.63 ± 27.72 s) compared to the treatment with pure water (340.24 ± 77.22 s) ( = -3.36, < 0.01). We investigated the rewarding effects of bubble tea, using the CPP paradigm, which measures the rewarding properties of abused drugs. Independent-samples -test revealed no significant difference between the two groups ( = -0.47, = 0.65).
Conclusion: In conclusion, we showed that long-term administration of bubble tea could not induce addictive behavior in mice. Meanwhile, the long-term effects of bubble tea on weight were also very limited. However, long-term consumption of bubble tea can lead to anxiety and depression-like behaviors and impair cognitive function in mice.

Keywords

References

  1. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2004 Feb;17(1):43-54 [PMID: 14718031]
  2. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(19):2876-2905 [PMID: 28056735]
  3. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Oct;37(10):1378-85 [PMID: 23318721]
  4. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(9):754-8 [PMID: 23131816]
  5. Chin Med. 2022 Feb 22;17(1):27 [PMID: 35193642]
  6. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Aug;103:178-199 [PMID: 31125634]
  7. J Nutr. 2006 Apr;136(4):1043-7 [PMID: 16549472]
  8. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;52(14):910-913 [PMID: 28835408]
  9. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 29;14(3): [PMID: 35276952]
  10. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(3):295-301 [PMID: 33575719]
  11. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 27;7(1):6287 [PMID: 28751637]
  12. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jul;13(7):1073-9 [PMID: 20074392]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 04;13(7): [PMID: 27384573]
  14. J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 15;299:620-627 [PMID: 34942229]
  15. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016 Mar;60(3):566-79 [PMID: 26626862]
  16. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct;86(4):1243-7 [PMID: 17921409]
  17. Appetite. 2014 Sep;80:41-54 [PMID: 24816323]
  18. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2020 Mar 30;29(1):26-38 [PMID: 32045514]
  19. J Med Invest. 2018;65(1.2):43-49 [PMID: 29593192]
  20. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;84(2):274-88 [PMID: 16895873]
  21. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Nov;236(11):3095-3110 [PMID: 31073738]
  22. J Food Prot. 2019 Aug;82(8):1384-1389 [PMID: 31335185]
  23. Nutrients. 2019 Jun 17;11(6): [PMID: 31212946]
  24. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 10;9(7):e101702 [PMID: 25010715]
  25. Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Feb 10;8(3):1554-1561 [PMID: 32180964]
  26. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Nov;55(Suppl 2):55-69 [PMID: 27372453]
  27. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 07;9:545 [PMID: 30464748]
  28. J Addict Med. 2009 Mar;3(1):33-41 [PMID: 21768998]
  29. Food Sci Nutr. 2016 Mar 29;5(1):38-45 [PMID: 28070314]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bubbletea=mice0weighttesttime±seffectstwogroups<01significantlytreatmentlong-termbodyaddictiveC57BL/6groupchangeFSTTSTCPPsignificant36anxietyincreasedimmobility67comparedpurewater-3alsorewardingadministrationbehaviorcognitivefunctionPurpose:lackrigorousexperimentalevidenceverifymentalhealthespeciallywhetherthingMaterialsmethods:Maleadultrandomlyassignedincludingbubble-teacontrolcalculatedBehaviortestsincludenovelobjectrecognitionNORTelevatedplusmazeEPMTforcedswimtailsuspensionconditionedplacepreferenceResults:effect83tea-treatedspentlessopenarmsindicatingincrease23903produced1865829treated112504679Similarly437632772340247722investigatedusingparadigmmeasurespropertiesabuseddrugsIndependent-samples-testrevealeddifference-04765Conclusion:conclusionshowedinduceMeanwhilelimitedHoweverconsumptioncanleaddepression-likebehaviorsimpairEffectschroniccognitionantidepressantmetabolicdiseasesobesitysugar-sweetenedbeverages

Similar Articles

Cited By