Orbitofrontal cortex functional connectivity changes in patients with binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa.

Jaeun Ahn, DeokJong Lee, Jung Eun Lee, Young-Chul Jung
Author Information
  1. Jaeun Ahn: Department of Psychiatry, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
  2. DeokJong Lee: Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  3. Jung Eun Lee: Yonsei Empathy Psychiatric Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.
  4. Young-Chul Jung: Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID

Abstract

We aimed to define the shared and unshared functional neurobiological underpinnings of binge eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN). These disorders both involve loss of control over binge eating, but differ based on purging behavior and body image distortion. BED and BN have also been found to show differences in brain activation patterns in reward sensitivity. We enrolled 13 and 12 drug-naive and medication-free women with BED and BN, respectively, and 22 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We performed an orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-seeded resting-state whole brain functional connectivity (FC) analysis among the groups. In this study, BED patients exhibited significantly higher impulsivity than controls, whereas the difference in impulsivity between BN and controls was not significant. Participants with BED and BN showed weaker FC between the left lateral OFC and the right precuneus than controls. In the BED only group, the FC strength between these regions was negatively correlated with self-reported impulsivity. In both BED and BN, FC between the left lateral OFC and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was weaker than that in controls. In BED, FC between the left medial OFC and the right cerebellar lobule IV was stronger than that of other groups. Our current results suggest similarities and differences between BED and BN in OFC-seeded FC with respect to reward processing. In particular, FC of the OFC in BED patients showed a significant correlation with their high impulsivity, which may reflect a decline in executive control over binge eating.

References

  1. Nutrients. 2017 Oct 27;9(11): [PMID: 29077027]
  2. Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(1):11-20 [PMID: 22116257]
  3. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2017 Nov;42(6):414-423 [PMID: 28949286]
  4. Neuron. 2006 Aug 17;51(4):509-20 [PMID: 16908415]
  5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Dec;1239:33-42 [PMID: 22145873]
  6. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 18;14(10):1338-44 [PMID: 21926982]
  7. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Sep;6(9):691-702 [PMID: 16136173]
  8. Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:415-436 [PMID: 29278773]
  9. Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;55:10-17 [PMID: 30384106]
  10. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Sep;11(9):1393-401 [PMID: 27056455]
  11. Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):47-55 [PMID: 7080884]
  12. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Jul 18;13(8):556-71 [PMID: 22805909]
  13. Neurosci Lett. 2012 Jul 19;521(2):152-7 [PMID: 22684096]
  14. Neuroimage. 2013 Sep;78:46-58 [PMID: 23587692]
  15. Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Mar;53(3):478-488 [PMID: 31868249]
  16. J Neurosci. 2012 May 2;32(18):6240-50 [PMID: 22553030]
  17. Front Syst Neurosci. 2017 Apr 27;11:25 [PMID: 28496402]
  18. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 28;10(1):15877 [PMID: 32985590]
  19. Eat Behav. 2018 Apr;29:114-119 [PMID: 29653301]
  20. J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 14;36(50):12688-12696 [PMID: 27974616]
  21. Psychol Rev. 2015 Jul;122(3):516-35 [PMID: 25961467]
  22. Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Dec;224(9):3001-3018 [PMID: 31451898]
  23. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Oct 20;12(11):652-69 [PMID: 22011681]
  24. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Sep;20(3):236-60 [PMID: 20821056]
  25. Brain Behav. 2019 Feb;9(2):e01207 [PMID: 30644179]
  26. Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Jan;159:74-82 [PMID: 33278466]
  27. Eur J Neurosci. 2017 May;45(9):1129-1140 [PMID: 27992088]
  28. J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 20;36(16):4600-13 [PMID: 27098701]
  29. Int J Eat Disord. 2002 Dec;32(4):412-25 [PMID: 12386906]
  30. eNeuro. 2022 Feb 15;9(1): [PMID: 35064023]
  31. J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 27;31(17):6398-404 [PMID: 21525280]
  32. Int J Eat Disord. 2001 Apr;29(3):294-301 [PMID: 11262508]
  33. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76542 [PMID: 24146885]
  34. Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):281-295 [PMID: 34079068]
  35. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Apr 15;65(8):654-61 [PMID: 18996508]
  36. Cereb Cortex. 2008 Jan;18(1):178-88 [PMID: 17517682]
  37. Cerebellum. 2013 Oct;12(5):623-31 [PMID: 23553468]
  38. J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8586-94 [PMID: 19571149]
  39. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jan 30;221(1):43-8 [PMID: 24300085]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Binge-Eating Disorder
Bulimia Nervosa
Bulimia
Brain
Prefrontal Cortex

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BEDBNFCcontrolsOFCbingeeatingimpulsivityfunctionalcortexpatientsleftrightdisorderbulimianervosacontroldifferencesbrainrewardconnectivitygroupssignificantshowedweakerlateralaimeddefinesharedunsharedneurobiologicalunderpinningsdisordersinvolvelossdifferbasedpurgingbehaviorbodyimagedistortionalsofoundshowactivationpatternssensitivityenrolled1312drug-naivemedication-freewomenrespectively22age-sex-matchedhealthyperformedorbitofrontal-seededresting-statewholeanalysisamongstudyexhibitedsignificantlyhigherwhereasdifferenceParticipantsprecuneusgroupstrengthregionsnegativelycorrelatedself-reporteddorsolateralprefrontalmedialcerebellarlobuleIVstrongercurrentresultssuggestsimilaritiesOFC-seededrespectprocessingparticularcorrelationhighmayreflectdeclineexecutiveOrbitofrontalchanges

Similar Articles

Cited By