The effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on biomechanical factors and perceived transient pain during prolonged sitting: a laboratory-controlled cross-sectional study.

D E De Carvalho, J P Callaghan
Author Information
  1. D E De Carvalho: Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
  2. J P Callaghan: Department of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. Jack.Callaghan@uwaterloo.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation has been shown to affect muscle activity, posture, and pain. To date, no studies have examined the effect of manipulation on biomechanical factors during sitting. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on trunk muscle activation, spine posture and movements, and perceived ratings of transient pain in asymptomatic adults during prolonged office sitting.
METHODS: Twenty healthy adults were recruited for a single laboratory session that included a standardized office sitting/data entry protocol (120 min total, 3 blocks of 40 min). Data were collected between July and August 2012. The first block (baseline) was immediately followed by two experimental blocks. Prior to the start of each experimental block, participants were transferred to a therapy plinth and placed side lying (right side down), and a random presentation of either a control or high velocity low amplitude thrust directed at L4/L5 was delivered. Continuous measures of muscle activity, spine posture, and spine movements were recorded throughout the sitting trials. Perceived transient pain was measured by visual analogue scale at 10-min intervals (including immediately before and after the randomized maneuvers).
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in spine or pelvic posture or perceived back pain following either the manipulation or control maneuvers. Significantly reduced muscle activity and increased shifts of the lumbar spine angle were identified in the block following manipulation compared to both baseline and post control blocks.
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal manipulation does not appear to have an immediate impact on spine or pelvic posture in healthy adults but does appear to reduce muscle activity and increase spine movement during sitting. Future work should replicate this study with a larger population in a field setting. It may be worthwhile to explore the implication of reduced muscle activation and increased spine movements during prolonged sitting for office workers that receive manipulations or mobilizations during their workday.

Keywords

References

  1. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Jun 3;28(1):25 [PMID: 32487243]
  2. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2):101-6 [PMID: 19243721]
  3. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Jan;18(1):9-13 [PMID: 12527241]
  4. Ergonomics. 2019 Nov;62(11):1415-1425 [PMID: 31478466]
  5. Age (Dordr). 2014;36(4):9672 [PMID: 24981113]
  6. BMC Med. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):35 [PMID: 28215182]
  7. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Oct;37(8):552-60 [PMID: 25220757]
  8. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(3):203-9 [PMID: 19362230]
  9. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 May;16(4):293-9 [PMID: 11358616]
  10. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):632-42 [PMID: 22513367]
  11. J Chiropr Med. 2003 Spring;2(2):51-4 [PMID: 19674595]
  12. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Nov-Dec;22(9):576-81 [PMID: 10626700]
  13. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):287-93 [PMID: 24928637]
  14. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250673 [PMID: 33901255]
  15. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Feb;34(2):88-97 [PMID: 21334540]
  16. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(3):166-70 [PMID: 10220716]
  17. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Dec;20(10):1101-10 [PMID: 16126314]
  18. Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):514-29 [PMID: 20494814]
  19. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(3):178-88 [PMID: 20350670]
  20. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):785-94 [PMID: 22349622]
  21. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Jun;14(3):333-42 [PMID: 15094147]
  22. J Altern Complement Med. 2020 Jul;26(7):592-601 [PMID: 32543211]
  23. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998 Aug;8(4):227-32 [PMID: 9779396]
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 15;27(2):E29-36 [PMID: 11805677]
  25. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jan;30(1):76; author reply 77 [PMID: 17224360]
  26. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Nov-Dec;28(9):667-72 [PMID: 16326236]
  27. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 May;34(4):211-20 [PMID: 21621722]
  28. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2008 Apr;79(4):365-73 [PMID: 18457293]
  29. Gait Posture. 2008 Jan;27(1):168-71 [PMID: 17419060]
  30. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):115-22 [PMID: 15626991]
  31. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;98(2):920-8 [PMID: 17537909]
  32. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 May;31(4):258-70 [PMID: 18486746]
  33. Work. 2003;20(3):237-44 [PMID: 12775929]
  34. Gait Posture. 2011 Oct;34(4):490-5 [PMID: 21802955]
  35. Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):650-9 [PMID: 16291107]
  36. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Feb;20(2):80-5 [PMID: 9046455]
  37. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Jul;14(3):280-6 [PMID: 20538226]
  38. Spine J. 2001 Mar-Apr;1(2):121-30 [PMID: 14588392]
  39. Man Ther. 2010 Apr;15(2):173-8 [PMID: 19945906]
  40. Man Ther. 2005 May;10(2):116-26 [PMID: 15922232]
  41. Man Ther. 2010 Feb;15(1):7-12 [PMID: 19643656]
  42. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(3):149-53 [PMID: 10220713]
  43. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Dec;18(10):890-8 [PMID: 14580832]
  44. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;118(2):391-402 [PMID: 17137836]
  45. Hum Factors. 2006 Spring;48(1):142-53 [PMID: 16696264]
  46. Physiotherapy. 2021 Sep;112:121-134 [PMID: 34049207]
  47. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(3):193-202 [PMID: 19362229]
  48. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;36(9):557-63 [PMID: 24161387]
  49. Work. 2010;35(1):3-14 [PMID: 20164621]
  50. Man Ther. 2007 Aug;12(3):280-5 [PMID: 16971162]
  51. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504 [PMID: 17909210]
  52. Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):469-75 [PMID: 20447857]
  53. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Aug;19(4):284-90 [PMID: 8235518]
  54. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 May;41(4):265-293 [PMID: 29606335]
  55. Gait Posture. 2008 Jul;28(1):86-92 [PMID: 18053722]
  56. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):315-33 [PMID: 20510644]
  57. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):335-56 [PMID: 15125860]
  58. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Nov-Dec;23(9):585-95 [PMID: 11145798]
  59. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Feb;36(2):68-77 [PMID: 23499141]
  60. Ergonomics. 2001 Feb 20;44(3):280-94 [PMID: 11219760]
  61. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Sep;28(7):465-71 [PMID: 16182019]
  62. Spine J. 2011 May;11(5):440-6 [PMID: 21463970]
  63. Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Nov 22;25:35 [PMID: 29201346]
  64. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Apr 21;28(1):19 [PMID: 32316995]
  65. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Apr;23(2):362-8 [PMID: 23122693]
  66. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(3):189-92 [PMID: 20350671]
  67. Ergonomics. 2000 Apr;43(4):486-93 [PMID: 10801082]

MeSH Term

Adult
Humans
Sitting Position
Cross-Sectional Studies
Manipulation, Spinal
Muscle, Skeletal
Lumbar Vertebrae
Back Pain

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spinemanipulationmuscleposturepainsittingactivitymovementseffectstudylumbarperceivedtransientadultsprolongedofficeblocksblockcontrolSpinalbiomechanicalfactorsimmediatespinalactivationhealthybaselineimmediatelyexperimentalsideeithermaneuverspelvicbackfollowingreducedincreasedappearSpineBACKGROUND:shownaffectdatestudiesexaminedThereforepurposeinvestigatetrunkratingsasymptomaticMETHODS:Twentyrecruitedsinglelaboratorysessionincludedstandardizedsitting/dataentryprotocol120 mintotal340 minDatacollectedJulyAugust2012firstfollowedtwoPriorstartparticipantstransferredtherapyplinthplacedlyingrightrandompresentationhighvelocitylowamplitudethrustdirectedL4/L5deliveredContinuousmeasuresrecordedthroughouttrialsPerceivedmeasuredvisualanaloguescale10-minintervalsincludingrandomizedRESULTS:significantdifferencesSignificantlyshiftsangleidentifiedcomparedpostCONCLUSIONS:impactreduceincreasemovementFutureworkreplicatelargerpopulationfieldsettingmayworthwhileexploreimplicationworkersreceivemanipulationsmobilizationsworkdaysitting:laboratory-controlledcross-sectionalLowManipulationSitting

Similar Articles

Cited By