COVID-19 prevention behaviour is differentially motivated by primary psychopathy, grandiose narcissism and vulnerable Dark Triad traits.

Alyson E Blanchard, Greg Keenan, Nadja Heym, Alex Sumich
Author Information
  1. Alyson E Blanchard: School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, M6 6PU, United Kingdom.
  2. Greg Keenan: Department of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool L16 9JD, United Kingdom.
  3. Nadja Heym: Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, United Kingdom.
  4. Alex Sumich: Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Dark Triad traits (psychopathy, narcissism) are associated with nonadherence to COVID-19 prevention measures such as social distancing and wearing face masks, although the psychological mechanisms underpinning this relationship remain unclear. In contrast, high threat-sensitivity may motivate compliance, and maybe seen in relation to vulnerable dark traits (secondary psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism and borderline personality disorder). The relationship between vulnerable dark traits and COVID-19 prevention behaviour has not been examined. During April 2021, participants ( = 263) completed an online psychometric study assessing engagement with COVID-19 prevention behaviour, traditional DT traits (primary psychopathy; grandiose narcissism) and vulnerable DT traits. Potential indirect effects were fear of COVID-19, perceived coronavirus severity, belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories and altruism. Model of path analysis identified predictors of engagement in disease prevention behaviour. Primary psychopathy, grandiose narcissism, secondary psychopathy and BPD were associated with less COVID-19 prevention behaviour, with an indirect effect of reduced coronavirus severity. Grandiose narcissism and BPD were also motivated by COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and increased prevention behaviour when fear of COVID-19 was higher. No direct or indirect effects were observed for vulnerable narcissism. The current study is the first to elucidate psychological mechanisms linking vulnerable dark traits with COVID-19 prevention behaviour.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135 [PMID: 20550733]
  2. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 11;21(1):246 [PMID: 33975568]
  3. J Pers Disord. 2016 Aug;30(4):530-44 [PMID: 26623536]
  4. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 May 1;174:171-180 [PMID: 28334662]
  5. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 27;280(1757):20122773 [PMID: 23446522]
  6. Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):534-549 [PMID: 30659628]
  7. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 15;11:519330 [PMID: 33178059]
  8. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;12(2):183-204 [PMID: 28346115]
  9. Behav Res Ther. 2002 Oct;40(10):1231-40 [PMID: 12375731]
  10. Personal Disord. 2019 Jan;10(1):87-96 [PMID: 30080061]
  11. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jan;68(1):151-8 [PMID: 7861311]
  12. Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Nov 1;166:110199 [PMID: 32565591]
  13. Br J Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;50(3):544-52 [PMID: 21486312]
  14. Eur J Pers. 2017 Jul-Aug;31(4):366-384 [PMID: 28983151]
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):400-416 [PMID: 15382988]
  16. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-1545 [PMID: 32226353]
  17. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):1171-1181 [PMID: 34177101]
  18. J Health Psychol. 2016 Sep;21(9):2021-32 [PMID: 25694344]
  19. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0244974 [PMID: 33412567]
  20. J Forensic Sci. 2018 Mar;63(2):474-477 [PMID: 28556964]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Oct;61(4):590-7 [PMID: 1960651]
  22. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 26;17(1):e0263191 [PMID: 35081170]
  23. Personal Disord. 2011 Apr;2(2):128-41 [PMID: 22448732]
  24. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Mar;171:110559 [PMID: 33867616]
  25. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 3;14(12):e0225964 [PMID: 31794581]
  26. Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Dec 1;167:110232 [PMID: 32834282]
  27. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e22635 [PMID: 32936777]
  28. Evol Psychol. 2017 Jan;15(1):1474704916676276 [PMID: 28152626]
  29. Cognition. 1995 Oct;57(1):1-29 [PMID: 7587017]
  30. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2018 Sep 19;5:15 [PMID: 30250740]
  31. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85 [PMID: 21244182]
  32. J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):500-12 [PMID: 22475323]
  33. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021 Jul;12(5):697-707 [PMID: 38602980]
  34. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2020 Oct 01;7:22 [PMID: 33014377]
  35. J Pers. 2010 Oct;78(5):1529-64 [PMID: 20663024]
  36. Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 07;12:683684 [PMID: 34305736]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19traitspreventionnarcissismvulnerablebehaviourpsychopathydarkDarkgrandioseindirectTriadassociatedpsychologicalmechanismsrelationshipsecondarypersonalitystudyengagementDTprimaryeffectsfearcoronavirusseverityconspiracytheoriesBPDmotivatedtriadnonadherencemeasuressocialdistancingwearingfacemasksalthoughunderpinningremainunclearcontrasthighthreat-sensitivitymaymotivatecompliancemaybeseenrelationborderlinedisorderexaminedApril2021participants = 263completedonlinepsychometricassessingtraditionalPotentialperceivedbeliefaltruismModelpathanalysisidentifiedpredictorsdiseasePrimarylesseffectreducedGrandiosealsoincreasedhigherdirectobservedcurrentfirstelucidatelinkingdifferentiallyBorderlineConspiracybeliefsFearNarcissismPsychopathyVulnerable

Similar Articles

Cited By