Reaching the top but not feeling on top of the world: Examining women's internalized power threats.

Sanne Feenstra, Christopher T Begeny, Jennifer Jordan, Michelle K Ryan, Janka I Stoker, Floor A Rink
Author Information
  1. Sanne Feenstra: Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  2. Christopher T Begeny: Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  3. Jennifer Jordan: IMD Business School, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  4. Michelle K Ryan: Global Institute for Women's Leadership, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  5. Janka I Stoker: Department of HRM&OB, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  6. Floor A Rink: Department of HRM&OB, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Abstract

More and more women are breaking the glass ceiling to obtain positions of power. Yet with this rise, some women experience threats to their power. Here we focus on women's perceived threats to the stability of their power and the degree to which women feel they do not deserve their power positions, as reflected in their impostor feelings. The present research identifies key workplace characteristics that are associated with these internalized power threats with survey data collected among 185 women in high-power positions. We find that negative workplace experiences (i.e., gender discrimination, denigrating treatment, lack of cultural fit, and lack of mentoring) are associated with a greater sense of power threat, which in turn relates to adverse workplace outcomes (i.e., reduced job satisfaction and increased emotional exhaustion and opting-out intentions). With this unique sample of high-powered women, our findings help illustrate the forces that make women experience power as precarious, thereby shedding light on the disadvantages these women face. We provide suggestions on how to reduce women's internalized power threats.

Keywords

References

  1. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;39(7):898-910 [PMID: 23613123]
  2. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 [PMID: 11148311]
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;99(3):482-97 [PMID: 20649369]
  4. Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 26;6(26):eaba7814 [PMID: 32637616]
  5. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2014 Mar 14;9(1):10 [PMID: 24628839]
  6. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Feb;85(1):86-101 [PMID: 10740959]
  7. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):349-61 [PMID: 14633471]
  8. Psychol Rev. 2003 Apr;110(2):265-84 [PMID: 12747524]
  9. J Pers. 2000 Aug;68(4):725-56 [PMID: 10934688]
  10. Nature. 2022 Apr;604(7906):403 [PMID: 35440820]
  11. Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 27;7:1445 [PMID: 27729882]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(6):1362-77 [PMID: 12500818]
  13. Front Psychol. 2015 May 27;6:720 [PMID: 26074860]
  14. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 13;11:575024 [PMID: 33312149]
  15. Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24 [PMID: 2648906]
  16. PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251871 [PMID: 33989362]
  17. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:275-298 [PMID: 28961059]
  18. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1252-1275 [PMID: 31848865]
  19. Psychol Sci. 2022 Apr;33(4):595-612 [PMID: 35318861]
  20. J Pers Assess. 2002 Apr;78(2):321-33 [PMID: 12067196]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0powerwomenthreatspositionswomen'simpostorworkplaceinternalizedexperiencefeelingsassociatediegenderlackthreattopbreakingglassceilingobtainYetrisefocusperceivedstabilitydegreefeeldeservereflectedpresentresearchidentifieskeycharacteristicssurveydatacollectedamong185high-powerfindnegativeexperiencesdiscriminationdenigratingtreatmentculturalfitmentoringgreatersenseturnrelatesadverseoutcomesreducedjobsatisfactionincreasedemotionalexhaustionopting-outintentionsuniquesamplehigh-poweredfindingshelpillustrateforcesmakeprecarioustherebysheddinglightdisadvantagesfaceprovidesuggestionsreduceReachingfeelingworld:Examiningphenomenoninstability

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.