Association between different sensory modalities based on concurrent time series data obtained by a collaborative reservoir computing model.

Itsuki Kanemura, Katsunori Kitano
Author Information
  1. Itsuki Kanemura: Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1, Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga, 5258577, Japan.
  2. Katsunori Kitano: Department of Information Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1, Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga, 5258577, Japan. kkt23219@is.ritsumei.ac.jp.

Abstract

Humans perceive the external world by integrating information from different modalities, obtained through the sensory organs. However, the aforementioned mechanism is still unclear and has been a subject of widespread interest in the fields of psychology and brain science. A model using two reservoir computing systems, i.e., a type of recurrent neural network trained to mimic each other's output, can detect stimulus patterns that repeatedly appear in a time series signal. We applied this model for identifying specific patterns that co-occur between information from different modalities. The model was self-organized by specific fluctuation patterns that co-occurred between different modalities, and could detect each fluctuation pattern. Additionally, similarly to the case where perception is influenced by synchronous/asynchronous presentation of multimodal stimuli, the model failed to work correctly for signals that did not co-occur with corresponding fluctuation patterns. Recent experimental studies have suggested that direct interaction between different sensory systems is important for multisensory integration, in addition to top-down control from higher brain regions such as the association cortex. Because several patterns of interaction between sensory modules can be incorporated into the employed model, we were able to compare the performance between them; the original version of the employed model incorporated such an interaction as the teaching signals for learning. The performance of the original and alternative models was evaluated, and the original model was found to perform the best. Thus, we demonstrated that feedback of the outputs of appropriately learned sensory modules performed the best when compared to the other examined patterns of interaction. The proposed model incorporated information encoded by the dynamic state of the neural population and the interactions between different sensory modules, both of which were based on recent experimental observations; this allowed us to study the influence of the temporal relationship and frequency of occurrence of multisensory signals on sensory integration, as well as the nature of interaction between different sensory signals.

References

  1. Neural Netw. 2019 Mar;111:47-63 [PMID: 30682710]
  2. Neural Netw. 2012 Nov;35:1-9 [PMID: 22885243]
  3. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Nov;84(5 Pt 1):051908 [PMID: 22181445]
  4. Neuron. 2009 Aug 27;63(4):544-57 [PMID: 19709635]
  5. J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 8;27(32):8636-42 [PMID: 17687041]
  6. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2021 Oct;70:163-170 [PMID: 34837752]
  7. Neural Netw. 2014 Dec;60:141-65 [PMID: 25218929]
  8. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Feb 16;13(2):e1005229 [PMID: 28207734]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Sep 1;33(10):2017-2031 [PMID: 32027584]
  10. Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):2-19 [PMID: 26447569]
  11. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):255-66 [PMID: 18354398]
  12. Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Jun 23;118(25):258101 [PMID: 28696758]
  13. Exp Brain Res. 2011 Sep;213(2-3):341-9 [PMID: 21556818]
  14. J Neurosci. 2009 May 20;29(20):6580-92 [PMID: 19458228]
  15. Hear Res. 2009 Dec;258(1-2):28-36 [PMID: 19410641]
  16. Nature. 1976 Dec 23-30;264(5588):746-8 [PMID: 1012311]
  17. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4607-12 [PMID: 21430160]
  18. Neuroscience. 2011 Mar 10;176:254-64 [PMID: 21185358]
  19. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Oct 8;14(10):e1006400 [PMID: 30296262]
  20. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17(9):2172-89 [PMID: 17135481]
  21. Front Integr Neurosci. 2019 Sep 12;13:51 [PMID: 31572136]
  22. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2017 Apr;43:25-34 [PMID: 27918886]
  23. J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 28;32(48):17108-19 [PMID: 23197704]
  24. Neural Comput. 2002 Nov;14(11):2531-60 [PMID: 12433288]
  25. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246986 [PMID: 33606815]
  26. Percept Psychophys. 1996 Apr;58(3):351-62 [PMID: 8935896]
  27. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep;2(5):580-593 [PMID: 26302308]
  28. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jul;29(7):848-57 [PMID: 18412133]
  29. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):790-811 [PMID: 23709064]
  30. Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jun;227(2):249-61 [PMID: 23604624]
  31. J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;32(11):3665-78 [PMID: 22423089]
  32. Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257-62 [PMID: 14761661]
  33. J Neurosci. 2018 Apr 4;38(14):3453-3465 [PMID: 29496891]
  34. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Jul;18(7):1025-33 [PMID: 26075643]
  35. Science. 2004 Apr 2;304(5667):78-80 [PMID: 15064413]
  36. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1432-8 [PMID: 17057707]
  37. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42503 [PMID: 22880007]
  38. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Jun;30(3):513-8 [PMID: 15161383]
  39. J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;32(11):3726-35 [PMID: 22423093]
  40. Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1697-703 [PMID: 17884498]
  41. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Oct;52:115-122 [PMID: 29778970]
  42. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1201-10 [PMID: 18776893]
  43. Science. 2006 Nov 24;314(5803):1311-4 [PMID: 17124325]

MeSH Term

Humans
Time Factors
Brain
Sensation
Cerebral Cortex
Auditory Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0modelsensorydifferentpatternsinteractionmodalitiessignalsinformationfluctuationmodulesincorporatedoriginalobtainedbrainreservoircomputingsystemsneuralcandetecttimeseriesspecificco-occurexperimentalmultisensoryintegrationemployedperformancebestbasedHumansperceiveexternalworldintegratingorgansHoweveraforementionedmechanismstillunclearsubjectwidespreadinterestfieldspsychologyscienceusingtwoietyperecurrentnetworktrainedmimicother'soutputstimulusrepeatedlyappearsignalappliedidentifyingself-organizedco-occurredpatternAdditionallysimilarlycaseperceptioninfluencedsynchronous/asynchronouspresentationmultimodalstimulifailedworkcorrectlycorrespondingRecentstudiessuggesteddirectimportantadditiontop-downcontrolhigherregionsassociationcortexseveralablecompareversionteachinglearningalternativemodelsevaluatedfoundperformThusdemonstratedfeedbackoutputsappropriatelylearnedperformedcomparedexaminedproposedencodeddynamicstatepopulationinteractionsrecentobservationsallowedusstudyinfluencetemporalrelationshipfrequencyoccurrencewellnatureAssociationconcurrentdatacollaborative

Similar Articles

Cited By