Edible insect biodiversity and anthropo-entomophagy practices in Kalehe and Idjwi territories, D.R. Congo.

Jackson Ishara, Marcellin C Cokola, Ariel Buzera, Mercy Mmari, David Bugeme, Saliou Niassy, Karume Katcho, John Kinyuru
Author Information
  1. Jackson Ishara: Department of Food Science and Technology, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O. Box 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. jackishara17@uea.ac.cd. ORCID
  2. Marcellin C Cokola: Department of Crop Sciences, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O Box: 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. ORCID
  3. Ariel Buzera: Department of Food Science and Technology, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O. Box 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. ORCID
  4. Mercy Mmari: Department of Biological and Food Sciences, The Open University of Tanzania, P.O. BOX 23409, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. ORCID
  5. David Bugeme: Crop Production and Protection Unit, Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  6. Saliou Niassy: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. ORCID
  7. Karume Katcho: Department of Crop Sciences, Université Evangélique en Afrique, P.O Box: 3323, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. ORCID
  8. John Kinyuru: Department of Food Science and Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Located in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (South-Kivu), Kalehe and Idjwi are two relatively unexplored territories with little to no research on edible insects even though anthropo-entomophagy practice is widespread. This study therefore aimed at exploring the biodiversity, perception, consumption, availability, host plants, harvesting techniques, and processing techniques of edible insects.
METHODS: Data were collected through a field survey using three techniques, namely structured interviews, direct observations, and insect collection and taxonomy. A total of 260 respondents, 130 in each territory, were interviewed. The field survey focused on inventorying commonly edible insects as well as recording consumer preferences, preference factors, seasonal availability, host plants, harvesting techniques, and processing and preservation methods. Samples for taxonomic characterization were preserved in 70% alcohol.
RESULTS: Nine edible insects, namely Ruspolia differens Serville 1838, Gryllotalpa Africana Palisot de Beauvois 1805, Locusta migratoria Linnaeus 1758, Macrotermes subhyalinus Rambur 1842, Gnathocera trivittata Swederus 1787, Rhynchophorus phoenicis Fabricius 1801, Vespula spp. Linnaeus 1758, Apis mellifera Linnaeus 1758, and Imbrasia oyemensis Rougeot 1955, were recorded as being consumed either as larvae, pupae, and adults. Ruspolia differens and M. subhyalinus were reported as the most preferred by consumers in the studied territories. A scatter plot of matrices and Pearson's correlations showed a negative correlation between preference based on taste, size, and shape, as well as perceived nutritional value. Their seasonal availability differs from one species to another and correlated with host plants availability. Harvesting techniques and processing and preservation methods depend on species, local knowledge, and practices.
CONCLUSION: The huge edible insect diversity observed in Kalehe and Idjwi is evidence of anthropo-entomophagy practices in the area. In addition to being an important delicacy and traditional foods, edible insects can contribute to food, environmental, and financial security through local business opportunities. Households can rely on edible insects to meet their nutritional needs instead of conventional livestock. Indigenous practices and technologies used for harvesting, processing, and preserving edible insects must be improved to meet international standards to increase the market and capitalize on the economic potential of edible insects.

Keywords

References

  1. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:563-83 [PMID: 23020616]
  2. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2021 Dec;48:64-71 [PMID: 34649017]
  3. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 28;12(1):1576 [PMID: 35091646]
  4. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Jul 19;9:50 [PMID: 23866996]
  5. Ecol Lett. 2021 Mar;24(3):393-397 [PMID: 33226184]
  6. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(14):2169-2188 [PMID: 29446643]
  7. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(13):3499-3508 [PMID: 33397123]
  8. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Nov 13;13(1):60 [PMID: 29132398]
  9. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 Jul;18(4):1166-1191 [PMID: 33336989]
  10. Insects. 2018 Apr 19;9(2): [PMID: 29671798]

MeSH Term

Bees
Animals
Edible Insects
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Insecta
Food
Larva

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0edibleinsectstechniquesavailabilityplantsprocessingpracticesKaleheIdjwiterritoriesanthropo-entomophagyhostharvestinginsectmethodsLinnaeus1758CongobiodiversityfieldsurveynamelywellpreferenceseasonalpreservationRuspoliadifferenssubhyalinusnutritionalspeciesHarvestinglocalcanmeetEdibleBACKGROUND:LocatedEasternDemocraticRepublicSouth-KivutworelativelyunexploredlittleresearcheventhoughpracticewidespreadstudythereforeaimedexploringperceptionconsumptionMETHODS:Datacollectedusingthreestructuredinterviewsdirectobservationscollectiontaxonomytotal260respondents130territoryinterviewedfocusedinventoryingcommonlyrecordingconsumerpreferencesfactorsSamplestaxonomiccharacterizationpreserved70%alcoholRESULTS:NineServille1838GryllotalpaAfricanaPalisotdeBeauvois1805LocustamigratoriaMacrotermesRambur1842GnathoceratrivittataSwederus1787RhynchophorusphoenicisFabricius1801VespulasppApismelliferaImbrasiaoyemensisRougeot1955recordedconsumedeitherlarvaepupaeadultsMreportedpreferredconsumersstudiedscatterplotmatricesPearson'scorrelationsshowednegativecorrelationbasedtastesizeshapeperceivedvaluediffersoneanothercorrelateddependknowledgeCONCLUSION:hugediversityobservedevidenceareaadditionimportantdelicacytraditionalfoodscontributefoodenvironmentalfinancialsecuritybusinessopportunitiesHouseholdsrelyneedsinsteadconventionallivestockIndigenoustechnologiesusedpreservingmustimprovedinternationalstandardsincreasemarketcapitalizeeconomicpotentialDRAnthropo-entomophagyBiodiversityHostProcessingSeasonal

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)