Differences in Subjective Well-Being between Formal and Informal Workers in Urban China.

Gengzhi Huang, Yanshan Yang, Yubing Lei, Jiangmin Yang
Author Information
  1. Gengzhi Huang: School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China. ORCID
  2. Yanshan Yang: School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
  3. Yubing Lei: School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
  4. Jiangmin Yang: School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between different types of employment and subjective well-being with a focus on informal employment. The China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS) for three selected years (2012, 2014 and 2016) shows an upward trend in the subjective well-being of urban workers in the 2010s. However, although the gap in subjective well-being between formal and informal workers narrowed, informal workers' subjective well-being was still lower than their formal counterparts. Factors affecting the subjective well-being of formal and informal workers and their different effects were revealed to explain this difference. The subjective well-being of informal workers is significantly related to their informal status of employment, economic conditions (such as income and working hours), human capital, social capital (such as perceived social justice and perceived community connectedness) and urban environment. The paper enhances the understanding of people's subjective well-being by differentiating informal/formal segments of working populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;2(4):253-260 [PMID: 30936533]
  2. New Solut. 2016 Aug;26(2):155-72 [PMID: 27252281]
  3. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  4. Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 25;13:771598 [PMID: 35282261]
  5. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1984;19(2):133-56 [PMID: 6519818]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(8):1733-49 [PMID: 18316146]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 19;109(25):9775-80 [PMID: 22586096]
  8. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15): [PMID: 35897453]

MeSH Term

Humans
Employment
Income
China
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urban Population
Socioeconomic Factors
Economics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0subjectivewell-beinginformalemploymentworkersformalChinapaperdifferenturbanworkingcapitalsocialperceivedexaminesrelationshiptypesfocusLabor-forceDynamicsSurveyCLDSthreeselectedyears201220142016showsupwardtrend2010sHoweveralthoughgapnarrowedworkers'stilllowercounterpartsFactorsaffectingeffectsrevealedexplaindifferencesignificantlyrelatedstatuseconomicconditionsincomehourshumanjusticecommunityconnectednessenvironmentenhancesunderstandingpeople'sdifferentiatinginformal/formalsegmentspopulationsDifferencesSubjectiveWell-BeingFormalInformalWorkersUrbanhappinessurbanization

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)