Audience Control over Children's Honest Reports.

Mariéle Diniz Cortez, Rafael H Mazzoca, Douglas Fernandes Donaris, Ricardo P Oliveira, Caio F Miguel
Author Information
  1. Mariéle Diniz Cortez: Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Via Washington Luis Km 235, São Carlos, SP 13565-905 Brazil. ORCID
  2. Rafael H Mazzoca: Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Via Washington Luis Km 235, São Carlos, SP 13565-905 Brazil.
  3. Douglas Fernandes Donaris: Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Via Washington Luis Km 235, São Carlos, SP 13565-905 Brazil.
  4. Ricardo P Oliveira: Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Via Washington Luis Km 235, São Carlos, SP 13565-905 Brazil.
  5. Caio F Miguel: Department of Psychology, California State University Sacramento, Sacramento, CA USA.

Abstract

We evaluated audience control over children's honest reports using a reversal (ABA or ABAB) design. Four typically developing children performed a computer game in which they had to shoot a target and then report on their performance during and at the end of each session. Baseline assessed the accuracy of their reports in the absence of an experimenter. During the audience condition, an adult was present in the room and observed the child during the task. Participants accurately reported their errors when an adult was present, whereas they lied about their performance by systematically reporting errors as correct responses when an adult was absent. Honest reports about their total score at the end of the session also increased in the presence of the audience member. These results suggest that the presence of an adult exerted control over children's honest/accurate reports. We discussed the reasons why the presence of an adult may have served as a discriminative stimulus for honest reports.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Anal. 1990 Fall;13(2):107-19 [PMID: 22478059]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):361-7 [PMID: 16812583]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):289-90 [PMID: 16812795]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):193-214 [PMID: 8433064]
  5. Behav Anal. 2002 Spring;25(1):57-73 [PMID: 22478378]
  6. Anal Verbal Behav. 2019 Jul 1;35(2):258-269 [PMID: 31976234]
  7. Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Sep 28;14(1):75-85 [PMID: 33732578]
  8. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):127-44 [PMID: 11421307]
  9. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter;17(4):429-40 [PMID: 16795679]
  10. Anal Verbal Behav. 1985;3:1-4 [PMID: 22477486]
  11. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):69-74 [PMID: 16795696]
  12. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Winter;1(4):267-81 [PMID: 16795186]
  13. Behav Anal Pract. 2018 May 7;12(1):194-198 [PMID: 30918784]
  14. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):134-146 [PMID: 30874313]
  15. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Fall;44(3):587-92 [PMID: 21941387]
  16. J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Winter;36(4):459-63 [PMID: 14768666]
  17. Anal Verbal Behav. 2017 Jun 27;33(2):275-282 [PMID: 30854302]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 May;93(3):395-413 [PMID: 21119853]
  19. Psychol Rep. 1989 Jun;64(3 Pt 1):971-84 [PMID: 2664850]
  20. Res Dev Disabil. 1990;11(4):379-93 [PMID: 2270320]
  21. Anal Verbal Behav. 2014 Feb 28;30(1):1-19 [PMID: 27274969]
  22. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):321-44 [PMID: 16812611]
  23. Anal Verbal Behav. 1985;3:5-9 [PMID: 22477487]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reportsadultaudiencepresencecontrolchildren'shonestperformanceendsessionpresenterrorsHonestAudienceevaluatedusingreversalABAABABdesignFourtypicallydevelopingchildrenperformedcomputergameshoottargetreportBaselineassessedaccuracyabsenceexperimenterconditionroomobservedchildtaskParticipantsaccuratelyreportedwhereasliedsystematicallyreportingcorrectresponsesabsenttotalscorealsoincreasedmemberresultssuggestexertedhonest/accuratediscussedreasons whyadult mayserveddiscriminativestimulusControlChildren'sReportsDo-saycorrespondenceHonestyLyingSelf-reportVerbalbehavior

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.