The duration and body position during tongue-kissing among heterosexual men and women.

Julien Tran, Christopher K Fairley, Jason J Ong, Catriona S Bradshaw, Ei T Aung, Kate Maddaford, Marcus Y Chen, Jane S Hocking, Eric P F Chow
Author Information
  1. Julien Tran: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  2. Christopher K Fairley: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  3. Jason J Ong: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  4. Catriona S Bradshaw: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  5. Ei T Aung: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  6. Kate Maddaford: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  7. Marcus Y Chen: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  8. Jane S Hocking: Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  9. Eric P F Chow: Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Abstract

Background: Emerging data suggest tongue-kissing may transmit gonorrhea. We aim to examine the duration or body position of heterosexual men and women during tongue-kissing (henceforth, known as kissing).
Methods: A cross-sectional survey among heterosexual men and women attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in Australia between May 2019 and March 2020 collected data on the duration and body position (i.e., on top of or lying down underneath) of their most recent kissing partner in the past 3 months. Univariable and multivariable linear regressions were performed to examine the association between gender and kissing duration.
Results: Of 2,866 individuals, 93.6% ( = 2,683) had at least one kissing partner in the past 3 months, which included 1,342 (50.1%) men and 1,341 (49.9%) women, and 87.2% ( = 2,339) had sex with their opposite-gender kissing partner. The adjusted mean duration of kissing with the most recent opposite-gender kissing partner did not differ between men and women (12.2 vs. 11.5 min, = 0.170). More men were on top of their most recent opposite-gender kissing partner compared to women (87.9 vs. 82.9%, < 0.001). men reported a longer kissing duration than women when they were on top of the opposite-gender kissing partner (8.3 vs. 7.4 min, = 0.006). More women had same-gender kissing partners than men (9.6 vs. 2.8%, < 0.001).
Conclusion: men spending longer than women on top of their opposite-gender kissing partner suggests a potential alternative explanation for oropharyngeal gonorrhea being seen more commonly in women. Further research should investigate whether body positioning and duration of kissing influence the risk of gonorrhea transmission.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 1967 May 13;1(7498):1052-3 [PMID: 4164481]
  2. Sex Health. 2020 Apr;17(2):149-154 [PMID: 32135076]
  3. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 02;8(1):ofaa536 [PMID: 33506064]
  4. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;19(10):e360-e366 [PMID: 31324517]
  5. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246129 [PMID: 33556085]
  6. AIDS Behav. 2020 Nov;24(11):3192-3204 [PMID: 32350774]
  7. Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Sep;97(6):452-457 [PMID: 33208509]
  8. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Nov;46(11):743-747 [PMID: 31517767]
  9. Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Aug;92(5):347-9 [PMID: 26622046]
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57(3):344-8 [PMID: 23595832]
  11. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(4):987-994 [PMID: 30513251]
  12. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 16;73(4):575-582 [PMID: 33513222]
  13. Sex Health. 2019 Sep;16(5):401-411 [PMID: 31505159]
  14. Mo Med. 2020 Jul-Aug;117(4):324-327 [PMID: 32848268]
  15. Sex Health. 2020 Jun;17(3):279-287 [PMID: 32571477]
  16. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2017 Sep 01;41(3):E212-E222 [PMID: 29720070]
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Oct;54(10):2485-90 [PMID: 27413195]
  18. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;19(10):e367-e369 [PMID: 31324518]
  19. Sex Transm Dis. 2020 Aug;47(8):541-548 [PMID: 32520884]
  20. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Jul;47(3):e4 [PMID: 32868336]
  21. Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Nov;95(7):516-521 [PMID: 31073095]
  22. Int J STD AIDS. 2018 May;29(6):598-602 [PMID: 29256822]
  23. Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Mar 31;148:e80 [PMID: 32228726]
  24. Sex Health. 2014 Nov;11(5):495-504 [PMID: 25377002]
  25. Lancet HIV. 2019 Jun;6(6):e396-e405 [PMID: 31006612]
  26. J Infect Dis. 2002 Sep 15;186(6):731-6 [PMID: 12198605]
  27. Arch Sex Behav. 2018 May;47(4):1283-1293 [PMID: 29464454]
  28. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27(12):1799-1804 [PMID: 33845205]
  29. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Aug;22 Suppl 6:e25354 [PMID: 31468730]
  30. BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 11;21(1):1152 [PMID: 34763670]
  31. Br J Vener Dis. 1973 Dec;49(6):491-9 [PMID: 4202719]
  32. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Dec 1;138(11):923-36 [PMID: 8256780]
  33. AIDS Behav. 2019 Feb;23(2):548-555 [PMID: 30117076]
  34. Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Dec;88(8):581-4 [PMID: 22875839]
  35. Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Mar;94(2):143 [PMID: 29463767]
  36. Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Oct;44(10):596-598 [PMID: 28910265]
  37. Sex Health. 2016 Jun;13(3):199-204 [PMID: 26886136]
  38. Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Dec;94(8):553-558 [PMID: 29654061]
  39. Sex Transm Dis. 1979 Apr-Jun;6(2):64-8 [PMID: 115097]
  40. Clin Transl Immunology. 2016 Aug 12;5(8):e94 [PMID: 27588199]
  41. J Sex Marital Ther. 2010;36(2):124-36 [PMID: 20169493]
  42. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Aug 1;43(3):276-82 [PMID: 16804839]
  43. Sex Health. 2022 Mar;19(1):27-32 [PMID: 35241217]
  44. Sex Health. 2018 Jul;15(4):350-357 [PMID: 29966584]
  45. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):102-104 [PMID: 27983487]
  46. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;12(6):950-7 [PMID: 16707051]
  47. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Feb 1;86(2):153-156 [PMID: 33433122]
  48. Sex Health. 2019 Sep;16(5):508-513 [PMID: 31203836]
  49. J Res Adolesc. 2018 Dec;28(4):779-785 [PMID: 29927006]
  50. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 31;6(3):e18456 [PMID: 21483799]
  51. Int J STD AIDS. 2020 Feb;31(2):127-135 [PMID: 31992145]
  52. J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45(2):159-172 [PMID: 30040548]

MeSH Term

Male
Humans
Female
Heterosexuality
Gonorrhea
Sexual Partners
Cross-Sectional Studies
Sexual Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0kissingwomendurationmenpartner2opposite-genderbodyheterosexualtop=vs0tongue-kissinggonorrheapositionrecent3dataexamineamongpastmonths19%87sexmin9<001MenlongerBackground:EmergingsuggestmaytransmitaimhenceforthknownMethods:cross-sectionalsurveyattendingMelbourneSexualHealthCentreAustraliaMay2019March2020collectedielyingunderneathUnivariablemultivariablelinearregressionsperformedassociationgenderResults:866individuals936%683leastoneincluded342501%341492%339adjustedmeandiffer12115170compared82reported874006same-genderpartners68%Conclusion:spendingsuggestspotentialalternativeexplanationoropharyngealseencommonlyresearchinvestigatewhetherpositioninginfluencerisktransmissionsalivasexuallytransmittedinfectiontonguekiss

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.