Exploring reading profiles of rural school students.

Johny Daniel, Amy Barth
Author Information
  1. Johny Daniel: School of Education, Durham University, Leazes Rd, Durham, DH1 1TA, UK. Johny.r.daniel@durham.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Amy Barth: William Jewell College, Liberty, MO, USA.

Abstract

This study investigates the reading profiles of rural Grade 5 and 6 students (N = 262), a sample with a high proportion of English language learners. We administered a battery of reading and cognitive assessments to classify students' reading profiles and evaluate if performance on cognitive measures predicted membership in particular profiles. Data were analyzed using latent profile analysis. Latent profile analysis showed four distinct reading profiles in our sample: students with severe reading disabilities (< 2%), students at high risk of reading disability (14%), students at some-risk of reading disability (46%), and students who are typical readers (38%). Lower performance on cognitive measures was associated with group membership in the severe reading profile group compared to the group of students at some-risk of reading failure. In contrast, higher performance on cognitive measures was associated with group membership in the typical reader group compared to students at some-risk of reading failure. In keeping with the findings from past studies documenting reader profiles, we found heterogeneity in the reading profiles of rural upper-elementary grade students. We discuss the need for multicomponent interventions that target all areas of reading with some flexibility in the dosage of each reading component dependent on the reader profiles established prior to intervention.

Keywords

References

  1. Except Child. 2019 Jan;85(2):180-196 [PMID: 31223172]
  2. Read Writ. 2014 Jan;27(1):101-127 [PMID: 26346315]
  3. J Learn Disabil. 2022 Jul-Aug;55(4):259-271 [PMID: 33926288]
  4. Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1544-60 [PMID: 21848955]
  5. Mem Cognit. 2001 Sep;29(6):850-9 [PMID: 11716058]
  6. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107 [PMID: 21768583]
  7. Psychol Methods. 2004 Mar;9(1):3-29 [PMID: 15053717]
  8. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2010 Dec 1;31(6):475-483 [PMID: 21243117]
  9. Multivariate Behav Res. 2013 Nov;48(6):775-815 [PMID: 26745595]
  10. Sci Stud Read. 2015;19(4):253-272 [PMID: 26997861]
  11. J Educ Psychol. 2010 Aug;102(3):701-711 [PMID: 20856691]
  12. Learn Disabil Q. 2021 Aug;44(3):183-196 [PMID: 35418724]
  13. Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1:S19-26 [PMID: 17931132]
  14. Learn Individ Differ. 2021 May;88: [PMID: 33994756]
  15. Read Res Q. 2011 Jul-Sep;46(3):189-221 [PMID: 27867226]
  16. J Learn Disabil. 2006 May-Jun;39(3):252-69 [PMID: 16724796]
  17. Struct Equ Modeling. 2013 Oct 1;20(4):640-657 [PMID: 24489457]
  18. J Learn Disabil. 2018 Sep/Oct;51(5):434-443 [PMID: 28693368]
  19. J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Apr;61(3):216-41 [PMID: 8636665]
  20. J Learn Disabil. 2012 Sep-Oct;45(5):433-52 [PMID: 22293684]
  21. Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82 [PMID: 3375398]
  22. Psychol Bull. 2018 Jan;144(1):48-76 [PMID: 29083201]
  23. J Learn Disabil. 2019 May/Jun;52(3):232-246 [PMID: 30484366]
  24. J Learn Disabil. 2022 Sep-Oct;55(5):408-426 [PMID: 34753334]
  25. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(6):942-53 [PMID: 24885289]
  26. Dev Psychol. 1997 Nov;33(6):934-45 [PMID: 9383616]
  27. J Learn Disabil. 2019 Jan/Feb;52(1):71-83 [PMID: 29774806]
  28. J Educ Psychol. 2019 Aug;111(6):982-1000 [PMID: 31435078]
  29. Rev Educ Res. 2016 Sep;86(3):756-800 [PMID: 28529386]
  30. Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):464-5 [PMID: 17255498]
  31. J Learn Disabil. 2006 Mar-Apr;39(2):108-28 [PMID: 16583792]
  32. Read Writ. 2013 Aug;26(7):1059-1086 [PMID: 24000271]
  33. Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16(4):313-25 [PMID: 20455127]
  34. Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):934-47 [PMID: 12428705]
  35. Read Writ. 2015 Apr 1;28(4):439-466 [PMID: 25821346]
  36. Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Dec;72(Pt 4):549-60 [PMID: 12495566]

Grants

  1. R15 HD092922/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Dyslexia
Reading
Students
Language
Schools
Learning Disabilities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0readingstudentsprofilesprofilegroupcognitiveruralperformancemeasuresmembershipsome-riskreaderhighanalysisLatentseveredisabilitiesdisabilitytypicalassociatedcomparedfailureReadingstudyinvestigatesGrade56N = 262sampleproportionEnglishlanguagelearnersadministeredbatteryassessmentsclassifystudents'evaluatepredictedparticularDataanalyzedusinglatentshowedfourdistinctsample:< 2%risk14%46%readers38%Lowercontrasthigherkeepingfindingspaststudiesdocumentingfoundheterogeneityupper-elementarygradediscussneedmulticomponentinterventionstargetareasflexibilitydosagecomponentdependentestablishedpriorinterventionExploringschoolCognitionRural

Similar Articles

Cited By