Helical coils augment embolization of the middle meningeal artery for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: A technical note.

Arvin R Wali, Alexander Himstead, Javier Bravo, Michael G Brandel, Brian R Hirshman, J Scott Pannell, Andrew D Nguyen, David R Santiago-Dieppa
Author Information
  1. Arvin R Wali: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  2. Alexander Himstead: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  3. Javier Bravo: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  4. Michael G Brandel: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  5. Brian R Hirshman: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  6. J Scott Pannell: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  7. Andrew D Nguyen: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
  8. David R Santiago-Dieppa: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

Abstract

Embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) is a safe and effective adjunct in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. While prior authors describe the use of coils to assist embolization by preventing reflux through eloquent collaterals, we de- scribe the use of coils to further open the MMA, allowing the administration of greater amounts of embolisate for a more robust embolization. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that helical coils can safely open the MMA following the administration of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles. This allows for more embolisate to be administered into the MMA for more effective treatment. A retrospective review was conducted at our institution including intraoperative images and postoperative clinical and radiographic follow up. Failure rates using MMA embolization with PVA and helical coil augmentation were compared to failure rates in the literature of MMA embolization with PVA or ethylene vinyl-alcohol copolymer alone. A total of 8 cases were reviewed in which this technique was implemented. There were no immediate complications after treatment. All patients that underwent helical coil embolization following the administration of PVA had increased amount of embolisate delivered into the MMA. All patients at follow up had resolution of the subdural hematoma on outpatient imaging. Helical coil embolization allows for more embolisate administration into the MMA and provides a technical advantage for patients that fail traditional techniques of embolization. Case series are taking place to further test this hypothesis and identify the ideal patient population that may gain maximal yield from this novel technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct-Dec;11(4):330-342 [PMID: 27695533]
  2. Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Aug;27(4):571-576 [PMID: 33375866]
  3. BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Apr 26;14(4): [PMID: 33906882]
  4. Exp Ther Med. 2018 Aug;16(2):959-965 [PMID: 30116345]
  5. J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun 23;:1-7 [PMID: 28644099]
  6. World Neurosurg. 2021 Sep;153:e300-e307 [PMID: 34214657]
  7. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015 Apr;57(4):266-70 [PMID: 25932293]
  8. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Oct;13(10):951-957 [PMID: 34193592]
  9. J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;49:40-47 [PMID: 29274740]
  10. Neurosurgery. 2019 Dec 1;85(6):801-807 [PMID: 30418606]
  11. Surg Neurol Int. 2013 Aug 19;4:104 [PMID: 24032079]
  12. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018 May 1;14(5):556-562 [PMID: 28973653]
  13. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;24(4):455-462 [PMID: 29720020]
  14. J Neurol Sci. 2021 Oct 15;429:118066 [PMID: 34488045]
  15. BMC Surg. 2013 Mar 01;13:5 [PMID: 23452673]
  16. World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:402-411.e2 [PMID: 29772364]
  17. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Apr;28(2):205-210 [PMID: 28325454]
  18. Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 27;11:923 [PMID: 32973670]
  19. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jul;12(7):695-699 [PMID: 31862830]
  20. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 31;(8):CD011402 [PMID: 27578263]
  21. Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):992-999 [PMID: 29019449]
  22. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Dec;12(12):1209-1213 [PMID: 32439812]
  23. Neurosurgery. 2008 Dec;63(6):1125-9; discussion 1129 [PMID: 19008766]
  24. Neurosurgery. 2021 Jan 13;88(2):268-277 [PMID: 33026434]
  25. Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 24;11:560269 [PMID: 33329304]
  26. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Oct 13;21(5):E444 [PMID: 34332506]
  27. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Dec;22(12):1895-900 [PMID: 26260114]
  28. World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:520-527 [PMID: 28249828]
  29. J Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;123(5):1209-15 [PMID: 25794342]
  30. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1067-73 [PMID: 19782872]
  31. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Apr 21;205:106652 [PMID: 33957409]
  32. Front Neurol. 2021 May 06;12:660885 [PMID: 34025564]
  33. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Jul;13(7):657-660 [PMID: 33077579]
  34. World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:622-623 [PMID: 32518056]
  35. J Neuroinflammation. 2017 May 30;14(1):108 [PMID: 28558815]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0embolizationMMAtreatmentsubduralcoilsadministrationembolisatePVAcoilmeningealarteryhematomahelicalpatientsHelicalmiddleeffectivechronicuseopenfollowingallowsfollowratestechniquetechnicalEmbolizationsafeadjunctpriorauthorsdescribeassistpreventingrefluxeloquentcollateralsde-scribeallowinggreateramountsrobustobjectivestudydemonstratecansafelypolyvinylalcoholparticlesadministeredretrospectivereviewconductedinstitutionincludingintraoperativeimagespostoperativeclinicalradiographicFailureusingaugmentationcomparedfailureliteratureethylenevinyl-alcoholcopolymeralonetotal8casesreviewedimplementedimmediatecomplicationsunderwentincreasedamountdeliveredresolutionoutpatientimagingprovidesadvantagefailtraditionaltechniquesCaseseriestakingplacetesthypothesisidentifyidealpatientpopulationmaygainmaximalyieldnovelaugmenthematoma:noteAugmentationChronicMiddleRecurrence

Similar Articles

Cited By