OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
The British journal of educational psychology
Jun, 2023;93 (2): 513-530.

Teachers' bullying-related cognitions as predictors of their responses to bullying among students.

Fleur Elisabeth van Gils, Karine Verschueren, Karlien Demol, Isabel Maria Ten Bokkel, Hilde Colpin
Author Information
  1. Fleur Elisabeth van Gils: School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. ORCID
  2. Karine Verschueren: School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. ORCID
  3. Karlien Demol: School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. ORCID
  4. Isabel Maria Ten Bokkel: School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. ORCID
  5. Hilde Colpin: School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. ORCID
PMID: 36645030 DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12574

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Teachers may play a key role in reducing bullying by responding to incidents among students. Inspired by the theory of planned behaviour, several studies have investigated teachers' bullying-related cognitions as predictors of their responses to bullying.
AIMS: This study investigated whether six teachers' bullying-related cognitions (i.e., perceived seriousness, empathy, attitudes, self-efficacy and attribution of the bullying) predicted five student-perceived teachers' responses (i.e., Non-Intervention, Disciplinary Methods, Victim Support, Mediation and Group Discussion) over time. By examining this objective, more insight into student perceptions of teachers' responses to bullying could also be provided.
SAMPLE: In total, 999 upper elementary school students (M  = 10.61 at Wave 1, SD  = .90; 53.6% girls) and their 59 teachers (M  = 39.61 at W1, SD  = 11.60; 79.7% female) participated.
METHODS: A bullying questionnaire was administered in three waves to assess students' perceptions of the teachers' responses. Teachers reported bullying-related cognitions in the first wave. Multilevel analyses were used to investigate the relative contribution of the predictors on the teachers' responses over time.
RESULTS: None of the teachers' bullying-related cognitions significantly predicted the teachers' specific responses.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that teachers' bullying-related cognitions are not reflected in their responses to bullying as perceived by students. Moreover, the findings indicate that students' perceptions of teachers' responses vary widely within classrooms and over time. Student- and teacher-reported teachers' responses might differ, and these possible differences should be taken into account.

Keywords

bullying elementary education longitudinal design multilevel student-perceived teachers' responses teachers' bullying-related cognitions

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
  2. Arseneault, L. (2018). Annual research review: The persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12841
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  5. Bauman, S., Rigby, K., & Hoppa, K. (2008). US teachers' and school counsellors' strategies for handling school bullying incidents. Educational Psychology, 28(7), 837-856. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802379085
  6. Begotti, T., Tirassa, M., & Acquadro Maran, D. (2017). School bullying episodes: Attitudes and intervention in pre-service and in-service Italian teachers. Research Papers in Education, 32(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1158857
  7. Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O'Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087929
  8. Burger, C., Strohmeier, D., Spröber, N., Bauman, S., & Rigby, K. (2015). How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.004
  9. Campaert, K., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2017). The efficacy of teachers' responses to incidents of bullying and victimization: The mediational role of moral disengagement for bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 43(5), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21706
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
  11. Colpin, H., Bauman, S., & Menesini, E. (2021). Teachers' responses to bullying: Unravelling their consequences and antecedents. Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 781-797. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1954903
  12. De Luca, L., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2019). The teacher's role in preventing bullying. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01830
  13. Dedousis-Wallace, A., & Shute, R. (2009). Indirect bullying: Predictors of teacher intervention, and outcome of a pilot educational presentation about impact on adolescent mental health. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 9, 2-17.
  14. Dedousis-Wallace, A., Shute, R., Varlow, M., Murrihy, R., & Kidman, T. (2014). Predictors of teacher intervention in indirect bullying at school and outcome of a professional development presentation for teachers. Educational Psychology, 34(7), 862-875. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785385
  15. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
  16. Ellis, A. A., & Shute, R. (2007). Teacher responses to bullying in relation to moral orientation and seriousness of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906x163405
  17. Fischer, S. M., & Bilz, L. (2019). Teachers' self-efficacy in bullying interventions and their probability of intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 751-764. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22229
  18. Fischer, S. M., Wachs, S., & Bilz, L. (2021). Teachers' empathy and likelihood of intervention in hypothetical relational and retrospectively reported bullying situations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 896-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1869538
  19. Gregus, S. J., Rodriguez, J. H., Pastrana, F. A., Craig, J. T., McQuillin, S. D., & Cavell, T. A. (2017). Teacher self-efficacy and intentions to use antibullying practices as predictors of children's peer victimization. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-2017-0060.v46-3
  20. Hawley, P. H., & Williford, A. (2015). Articulating the theory of bullying intervention programs: Views from social psychology, social work, and organizational science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.006
  21. Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003
  22. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
  23. Inchley, J., Currie, D., Budisavljevic, S., Torsheim, T., Jåstad, A., Cosma, A., Kelly, C., & Arnarsson, Á. M. (2020). Spotlight on adolescent health and well-being. Findings from the 2017/2018 health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) survey in Europe and Canada. International report. Volume 1. Key findings. WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  24. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M. E. (2008). Teachers' views and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students' coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 431-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005
  25. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  26. Long, J. A. (2020). Jtools: Analysis and presentation of social scientific data. https://cran.r-project.org/package=jtools
  27. Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1494-1502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y
  28. Menesini, E. (2019). Translating knowledge into interventions: An ‘individual by context’ approach to bullying. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(3), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1564273
  29. Nappa, M. R., Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2021). Do the face-to-face actions of adults have an online impact? The effects of parent and teacher responses on cyberbullying among students. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 798-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1860746
  30. Oldenburg, B., van Duijn, M., Sentse, M., Huitsing, G., van der Ploeg, R., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2015). Teacher characteristics and peer victimization in elementary schools: A classroom-level perspective. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9847-4
  31. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishing.
  32. Padgett, S., & Notar, C. E. (2013). Bystanders are the key to stopping bullying. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010201
  33. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::aid-ab1>3.0.co;2-t
  34. Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Jak, S. (2012). Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher-student relationship quality. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.12.002
  35. Strohmeier, D., & Gradinger, P. (2021). Teachers' knowledge and intervention strategies to handle hate-postings. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 865-879. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1877130
  36. Thijs, J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2009). Toward a further understanding of teachers' reports of early teacher-child relationships: Examining the roles of behavior appraisals and attributions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.03.001
  37. Troop-Gordon, W., Kaeppler, A. K., & Corbitt-Hall, D. J. (2021). Youth's expectations for their teacher's handling of peer victimization and their socioemotional development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(1), 13-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431620931192
  38. Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. W. (2015). Teachers' victimization-related beliefs and strategies: Associations with students' aggressive behavior and peer victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9840-y
  39. van Hattum, M. (1997). Pesten. Een onderzoek naar de beleving, visie en handelen van leraren en leerlingen [Bullying. Teachers' and students' experiences, visions, and behavior]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  40. van Gils, F. E., Colpin, H., Verschueren, K., Demol, K., ten Bokkel, I. M., Menesini, E., & Palladino, B. E. (2022). Teachers’ Responses to Bullying Questionnaire: A validation study in two educational contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 830850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830850
  41. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1135-1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036110
  42. Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.003
  43. Wachs, S., Bilz, L., Niproschke, S., & Schubarth, W. (2019). Bullying intervention in schools: A multilevel analysis of teachers' success in handling bullying from the students' perspective. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(5), 642-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618780423
  44. Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009017532121
  45. Williford, A., DePaolis, K. J., & Colonnieves, K. (2021). Differences in school staff attitudes, perceptions, self-efficacy beliefs, and intervention likelihood by form of student victimization. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 12(1), 83-107. https://doi.org/10.1086/713360
  46. Yoon, J. S., & Bauman, S. (2014). Teachers: A critical but overlooked component of bullying prevention and intervention. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 308-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947226
  47. Yoon, J. S., & Kerber, K. (2003). Bullying: Elementary teachers' attitudes and intervention strategies. Research in Education, 69(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.7227/rie.69.3
  48. Yoon, J. S., Sulkowski, M. L., & Bauman, S. (2016). Teachers' responses to bullying incidents: Effects of teacher characteristics and contexts. Journal of School Violence, 15(1), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.963592

Grants

  1. G071317N/Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  2. C24/17/026/Onderzoeksraad KU Leuven

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Child
Aged, 80 and over
Adult
Male
Attitude
Students
Educational Personnel
School Teachers
Bullying
Cognition
Journal Article
Article has an altmetric score of 2

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0teachers'responsesbullyingbullying-relatedcognitionsstudentspredictorstimeperceptionsTeachersamonginvestigatedieperceivedpredictedstudent-perceivedelementaryM61SDstudents'findingsBACKGROUND:mayplaykeyrolereducingrespondingincidentsInspiredtheoryplannedbehaviourseveralstudiesAIMS:studywhethersixseriousnessempathyattitudesself-efficacyattributionfiveNon-InterventionDisciplinaryMethodsVictimSupportMediationGroupDiscussionexaminingobjectiveinsightstudentalsoprovidedSAMPLE:total999upperschool = 10Wave1 = 90536%girls59teachers = 39W1 = 1160797%femaleparticipatedMETHODS:questionnaireadministeredthreewavesassessreportedfirstwaveMultilevelanalysesusedinvestigaterelativecontributionRESULTS:NonesignificantlyspecificCONCLUSIONS:suggestreflectedMoreoverindicatevarywidelywithinclassroomsStudent-teacher-reportedmightdifferpossibledifferencestakenaccountTeachers'educationlongitudinaldesignmultilevel

Similar Articles

Cited By