Veronica L Richards, Yan Wang, Eric C Porges, Joseph M Gullett, Robert F Leeman, Zhi Zhou, Nancy P Barnett, Robert L Cook
alcohol use can be measured in many ways, including objectively through transdermal alcohol biosensors (e.g., transdermal alcohol concentration; TAC) or blood biomarkers (e.g., phosphatidylethanol; PEth), or subjectively through self-report (e.g., with the timeline followback; TLFB). However, it is unclear which measures best indicate changes in alcohol use within individuals following intervention, and if they have concurrent validity. In the context of contingency management (CM) with a goal of 30-day abstinence ( = 45, 60% male, 80% Black; = 56.7; 58% with HIV), we examined relationships among changes in TAC-AUC (area under the curve, reflecting volume consumed), PEth, and self-reported number of drinks. The Secure Continuous Remote alcohol Monitor Continuous alcohol Monitoring (SCRAM-CAM) biosensor was used to collect TAC-AUC during a pre-CM period (���7 days) and over a 30-day CM period. PEth was collected at baseline and 30-day follow-up. Number of drinks was self-reported through a 30-day TLFB at baseline and follow-up. Daily TAC-AUC and number of self-reported drinks were calculated for the pre-CM period and for the last 7 days of the CM period. Linear regression models controlling for baseline values revealed that change in TAC-AUC was significantly associated with change in PEth (�� = 0.33, < .0001) and with change in number of self-reported drinks (�� = 0.34, < .0001). Change in PEth was significantly associated with change in number of self-reported drinks (�� = 0.85, < .0001). We conclude that all three measures may be appropriate for measuring within-person change in alcohol use, while controlling for baseline values, in the context of a study testing an intervention such as CM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
