Evaluating the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Aflibercept Based on a Regional Network of Ophthalmologic Care Givers.

Haidar Khalil, Siegfried Mariacher, Rupert Strauss, Dominika Podkowinski, Klemens Waser, Matthias Bolz
Author Information
  1. Haidar Khalil: Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz 4020, Austria. ORCID
  2. Siegfried Mariacher: Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz 4020, Austria. ORCID
  3. Rupert Strauss: Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz 4020, Austria. ORCID
  4. Dominika Podkowinski: Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz 4020, Austria.
  5. Klemens Waser: Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz 4020, Austria.
  6. Matthias Bolz: Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz 4020, Austria. ORCID

Abstract

Purpose: In Austria, anti-VEGF therapies are reimbursed only in clinical settings. This study aimed to describe the outcome of a treat and extend regimen (TER) with aflibercept for diabetic macular edema (DME) in a network of practitioners.
Methods: In a prospective study over 36 months, patients with DME were treated with a loading dose of aflibercept and further on with adjusted treatment intervals based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings. All patients were monitored in an outpatient setting by regional ophthalmologists, and the treatment was administered in the clinic. Main outcome parameters were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to the last regular visit. Number of visits at the practitioner's office as well as the number of injections were secondary outcome parameters.
Results: Thirty-three patients completed the study at their final visit. BCVA improved significantly by 5.8 letters between baseline and the final visit from 70.4 letters at baseline (=0.004). Patients visited the practitioner's office 12.8 times in the observation period of 36 months. 3.7, 5.1, and 3.9 visits were performed, respectively, in the first, second, and third years, and 25.5 ± 7.9 injections were performed. The mean interval of injections over the observation period was 6.2 ± 2.2 in weeks.
Conclusion: The treat and extend regimen was valuable for treating patients with DME in this specific setting. The functional results of this study were comparable to those of other real-world evaluations. Adherence to the same treating institution seems to be important to avoid differences in therapeutic decision making and may also increase patient's compliance.

References

  1. Ophthalmologica. 2020;243(4):255-262 [PMID: 31914437]
  2. Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2701-2716 [PMID: 35412227]
  3. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;65(3):354-362 [PMID: 33559843]
  4. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;105(2):216-221 [PMID: 32265201]
  5. Eye (Lond). 2021 Feb;35(2):559-567 [PMID: 32350452]
  6. Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul;122(7):1402-15 [PMID: 25983216]
  7. Adv Ther. 2020 Mar;37(3):1173-1187 [PMID: 32016788]
  8. Ophthalmologe. 2020 Jun;117(6):557-565 [PMID: 31555836]
  9. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;5(2):143-155 [PMID: 27496796]
  10. Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec;122(12):2514-22 [PMID: 26391465]
  11. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;134(3):278-85 [PMID: 26746868]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203 [PMID: 25692915]
  13. Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2293-2300 [PMID: 29068914]
  14. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;34(4):290-296 [PMID: 32783421]
  15. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 24;11(1):4488 [PMID: 33627712]
  16. Pharmaceutics. 2019 Jul 31;11(8): [PMID: 31370346]
  17. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2247-54 [PMID: 25012934]
  18. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;259(6):1419-1425 [PMID: 32997285]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studypatientsoutcomeDMEbaselinevisitinjectionstreatextendregimenaflibercept36 monthstreatmentsettingparametersBCVAvisitspractitioner'sofficefinal58lettersobservationperiod39performedtreatingPurpose:Austriaanti-VEGFtherapiesreimbursedclinicalsettingsaimeddescribeTERdiabeticmacularedemanetworkpractitionersMethods:prospectivetreatedloadingdoseadjustedintervalsbasedopticalcoherencetomographyOCTfindingsmonitoredoutpatientregionalophthalmologistsadministeredclinicMainbest-correctedvisualacuitylastregularNumberwellnumbersecondaryResults:Thirty-threecompletedimprovedsignificantly704=0004Patientsvisited12times71respectivelyfirstsecondthirdyears255 ± 7meaninterval62 ± 22weeksConclusion:valuablespecificfunctionalresultscomparablereal-worldevaluationsAdherenceinstitutionseemsimportantavoiddifferencestherapeuticdecisionmakingmayalsoincreasepatient'scomplianceEvaluatingTreatmentDiabeticMacularEdemaAfliberceptBasedRegionalNetworkOphthalmologicCareGivers

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.