Obstetric pain management for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: A qualitative and quantitative comparison of patient and provider perspectives (QUEST study).

Emma Nowakowski, Sanjana Dayananda, Madison Morgan, Olivia Jarvis, Valeria Altamirano, Kelsea R LaSorda, Elizabeth Krans, Grace Lim
Author Information
  1. Emma Nowakowski: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  2. Sanjana Dayananda: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  3. Madison Morgan: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  4. Olivia Jarvis: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  5. Valeria Altamirano: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  6. Kelsea R LaSorda: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  7. Elizabeth Krans: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. ORCID
  8. Grace Lim: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) may experience inadequate pain management especially during childbirth. This study assessed and compared patient and provider perspectives on analgesia during and after delivery in women with OUD.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort, mixed method design including semi-structured interviews and structured surveys with pregnant or recently pregnant patients (n = 17) and provider (n = 15) groups.
SETTING: Prenatal clinics and hospital postpartum units.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients were pregnant women with OUD currently treated with methadone (n = 1) or buprenorphine (n = 16). Providers were obstetricians (n = 5), obstetric nurses (n = 5) and anesthesiologists (n = 5).
MEASUREMENTS: Validated questionnaires were completed by both groups; patient interviews were conducted during the third trimester and at 5 days post-delivery. Patient topics included pain management preferences, analgesia satisfaction and attitudes toward pain. Provider topics included labor and postpartum pain management perspectives. Interviews were independently coded and qualitatively analyzed for major themes.
FINDINGS: Five major themes emerged from patient interviews: (1) neuraxial blockade was endorsed for labor pain; (2) otherwise, limited pain control options were perceived; (3) no consensus around use of opioids for pain; (4) non-opioid options should be available; and (5) provider communication and health-care system issues act as barriers to adequate pain management. Provider perspective themes included the following: (1) unique challenges in pain management for patients with OUD; (2) confusion on how to plan for and make perinatal adjustments to medication for OUD; (3) discrepant views on use of opioids for pain management; (4) endorsement of non-pharmacological and non-opioid options; and (5) need for improved provider collaboration in developing pain management plans.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with opioid use disorder and health-care providers prioritize pain management during and after childbirth, but have discrepant views on use of opioids and other pain management options. Inadequate care coordination and discrepancies in opinions need to be addressed both within care teams and between patients and providers. Clinicians would benefit from better evidence to guide clinical care of patients with OUD for patient-centered pain management.

Keywords

References

  1. J Behav Med. 2000 Aug;23(4):351-65 [PMID: 10984864]
  2. Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45 [PMID: 20204937]
  3. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jan 1;146:1-6 [PMID: 25468815]
  4. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:119-27 [PMID: 26931289]
  5. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jun;31(3):243-250 [PMID: 29601303]
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):488-489 [PMID: 28742670]
  7. J Neurol. 2022 Mar;269(3):1439-1446 [PMID: 34274993]
  8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):115-116 [PMID: 30273587]
  9. J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Sep;56:112-9 [PMID: 24931848]
  10. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Jan 02;7:2050312118822927 [PMID: 30637106]
  11. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jul 20;6(1):80 [PMID: 35857151]
  12. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7 [PMID: 2280326]
  13. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Aug;139:108765 [PMID: 35341614]
  14. J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec 2;145:102-110 [PMID: 34890916]
  15. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Jul;23(7):921-935 [PMID: 35435616]
  16. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):e0227966 [PMID: 31951640]
  17. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 17;14:180 [PMID: 24938124]
  18. Adicciones. 2022 Apr 20;0(0):1680 [PMID: 35472158]
  19. J Behav Med. 1998 Aug;21(4):389-410 [PMID: 9789168]

Grants

  1. K12 HD043441/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR001857/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Pregnant People
Pain Management
Prospective Studies
Opioid-Related Disorders
Analgesics, Opioid
Buprenorphine
Pain

Chemicals

Analgesics, Opioid
Buprenorphine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painmanagementusen =OUDpatient5provideropioidperspectivespregnantpatientsoptionscarePatientsdisorderanalgesiawomen1includedthemesopioidschildbirthstudyinterviewsgroupspostpartumtopicsProviderlabormajor234non-opioidhealth-carediscrepantviewsneedprovidersBACKGROUNDANDAIM:mayexperienceinadequateespeciallyassessedcompareddeliveryDESIGN:Prospectivecohortmixedmethoddesignincludingsemi-structuredstructuredsurveysrecently1715SETTING:PrenatalclinicshospitalunitsPARTICIPANTS:currentlytreatedmethadonebuprenorphine16ProvidersobstetriciansobstetricnursesanesthesiologistsMEASUREMENTS:Validatedquestionnairescompletedconductedthirdtrimesterdayspost-deliveryPatientpreferencessatisfactionattitudestowardInterviewsindependentlycodedqualitativelyanalyzedFINDINGS:Fiveemergedinterviews:neuraxialblockadeendorsedotherwiselimitedcontrolperceivedconsensusaroundavailablecommunicationsystemissuesactbarriersadequateperspectivefollowing:uniquechallengesconfusionplanmakeperinataladjustmentsmedicationendorsementnon-pharmacologicalimprovedcollaborationdevelopingplansCONCLUSIONS:prioritizeInadequatecoordinationdiscrepanciesopinionsaddressedwithinteamsCliniciansbenefitbetterevidenceguideclinicalpatient-centeredObstetricdisorder:qualitativequantitativecomparisonQUESTLaborcentered

Similar Articles

Cited By