Toward Sourdough Microbiome Data: A Review of Science and Patents.

Gabriel Albagli, Priscilla V Finotelli, Tatiana Felix Ferreira, Priscilla F F Amaral
Author Information
  1. Gabriel Albagli: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências de Alimentos (PPGCAL), Instituto de Química, Univrisdade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, da Silveira Ramos, 149, CT, Bl. A, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, RJ, Brazil.
  2. Priscilla V Finotelli: Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro21941-170, RJ, Brazil.
  3. Tatiana Felix Ferreira: Escola de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Athos da Silveira Ramos, 149, CT, Bl. E, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro21941-909, RJ, Brazil. ORCID
  4. Priscilla F F Amaral: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências de Alimentos (PPGCAL), Instituto de Química, Univrisdade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, da Silveira Ramos, 149, CT, Bl. A, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, RJ, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

Technological prospecting was performed on documents related to sourdough microbiota using SCOPUS, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Espacenet and Patent Inspiration databases. Scientific articles and patents were analyzed based on three different perspectives: macro (year of publication, country, and institutions), meso (categorization as different taxonomies according to the subject evaluated), and micro (in-depth analysis of the main taxonomies, gathering the documents in subcategories). The main subject addressed in patents was the starter and product preparation, while 58.8% of the scientific publications focused on sourdough starter microbiota (identification and selection of microorganisms). Most patents were granted to companies (45.9%), followed by independent inventors (26.4%) and universities (21.8%). Sourdough products are in the spotlight when the subject is the bakery market; however, a closer integration between academia and industry is needed. Such a collaboration could generate a positive impact on the sourdough market in terms of innovation, providing a bread with a better nutritional and sensory quality for all consumers. Moreover, sourdough creates a new magnitude of flavor and texture in gastronomy, providing new functional products or increasing the quality of traditional ones.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019 Aug 2;302:69-79 [PMID: 30017109]
  2. Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 30;10(1):12856 [PMID: 32732890]
  3. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021 Jun 2;347:109190 [PMID: 33836445]
  4. Food Chem. 2020 Feb 15;306:125620 [PMID: 31606627]
  5. J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Mar 10;52(5):1307-14 [PMID: 14995138]
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Dec;64(6):886-93 [PMID: 8942413]
  7. Microorganisms. 2020 Feb 21;8(2): [PMID: 32098250]
  8. Food Microbiol. 2007 Apr;24(2):165-74 [PMID: 17008161]
  9. Microorganisms. 2020 Sep 10;8(9): [PMID: 32927810]
  10. Microb Cell Fact. 2015 Oct 22;14:168 [PMID: 26494432]
  11. J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Aug;96(11):3897-905 [PMID: 26693837]
  12. J Food Sci Technol. 2019 Sep;56(9):4057-4067 [PMID: 31477977]
  13. Foods. 2020 Sep 19;9(9): [PMID: 32961748]
  14. Food Chem. 2020 Dec 15;333:127410 [PMID: 32682227]
  15. Food Microbiol. 2020 Sep;90:103491 [PMID: 32336362]
  16. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020 Nov 16;333:108792 [PMID: 32707524]
  17. J Food Sci. 2020 Aug;85(8):2286-2295 [PMID: 32691422]
  18. Food Microbiol. 2014 Feb;37:59-68 [PMID: 24230474]
  19. Food Chem. 2020 Aug 30;322:126710 [PMID: 32283363]
  20. Curr Microbiol. 2022 Apr 9;79(5):148 [PMID: 35397016]
  21. Food Microbiol. 2019 Feb;77:43-51 [PMID: 30297055]
  22. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236190 [PMID: 32702068]
  23. Science. 1996 Jul 26;273(5274):488-90 [PMID: 8662535]
  24. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Feb;100(4):1701-1711 [PMID: 26481620]
  25. Food Microbiol. 2021 Oct;99:103837 [PMID: 34119121]
  26. J Basic Microbiol. 2020 Sep;60(9):787-798 [PMID: 33448445]
  27. PeerJ. 2021 May 10;9:e11389 [PMID: 34026358]
  28. Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Sep 06;9(11):6139-6151 [PMID: 34760245]
  29. Acta Diabetol. 2008 Jun;45(2):91-6 [PMID: 18317680]
  30. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019 Aug 2;302:47-58 [PMID: 30115372]
  31. Nutrition. 2020 Nov - Dec;79-80:110759 [PMID: 32563767]
  32. Food Microbiol. 2021 Apr;94:103629 [PMID: 33279061]
  33. Food Microbiol. 2014 Feb;37:51-8 [PMID: 24230473]
  34. Foods. 2021 Sep 03;10(9): [PMID: 34574197]
  35. Eur J Nutr. 2012 Jun;51(4):507-12 [PMID: 22307223]
  36. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2013 Feb;64(1):77-81 [PMID: 22765269]
  37. J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Jul;98(9):3501-3512 [PMID: 29314016]
  38. Food Sci Technol Int. 2020 Jun;26(4):344-352 [PMID: 31870194]
  39. Food Microbiol. 2020 Oct;91:103539 [PMID: 32539972]

Grants

  1. E-26/201.419/2022/Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  2. CNPq - Bolsa PQ: 308626/2019-2/Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sourdoughpatentssubjectstarterprospectingdocumentsmicrobiotaSciencearticlesdifferenttaxonomiesmain8%scientificSourdoughproductsmarketprovidingqualitynewTechnologicalperformedrelatedusingSCOPUSWebGoogleScholarEspacenetPatentInspirationdatabasesScientificanalyzedbasedthreeperspectives:macroyearpublicationcountryinstitutionsmesocategorizationaccordingevaluatedmicroin-depthanalysisgatheringsubcategoriesaddressedproductpreparation58publicationsfocusedidentificationselectionmicroorganismsgrantedcompanies459%followedindependentinventors264%universities21spotlightbakeryhowevercloserintegrationacademiaindustryneededcollaborationgeneratepositiveimpacttermsinnovationbreadbetternutritionalsensoryconsumersMoreovercreatesmagnitudeflavortexturegastronomyfunctionalincreasingtraditionalonesTowardMicrobiomeData:ReviewPatentsmicrobestechnological

Similar Articles

Cited By