Indian Biosimilars and Vaccines at Crossroads-Replicating the Success of Pharmagenerics.

Sunita Panda, Puneet Kumar Singh, Snehasish Mishra, Sagnik Mitra, Priyabrata Pattnaik, Sanjib Das Adhikary, Ranjan K Mohapatra
Author Information
  1. Sunita Panda: School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
  2. Puneet Kumar Singh: School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India. ORCID
  3. Snehasish Mishra: School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
  4. Sagnik Mitra: Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore 453552, India. ORCID
  5. Priyabrata Pattnaik: Merck Pte Ltd., 2 Science Park Drive, Ascent Building, #05-01/12, Singapore 118222, Singapore.
  6. Sanjib Das Adhikary: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
  7. Ranjan K Mohapatra: Department of Chemistry, Government College of Engineering, Keonjhar 758002, India. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The global pharma sector is fast shifting from generics to biologics and biosimilars with the first approval in Europe in 2006 followed by US approval in 2015. In the form of Hepatitis B vaccine, India saw its first recombinant biologics approval in 2000. Around 20% of generic medications and 62% of vaccines are now supplied by the Indian pharmaceutical industry. It is this good position in biologics and biosimilars production that could potentially improve healthcare via decreased treatment cost. India has witnessed large investments in biosimilars over the years. Numerous India-bred new players, e.g., Enzene Biosciences Ltd., are keen on biosimilars and have joined the race alongside the emerging giants, e.g., Biocon and Dr. Reddy's. A very positive sign was the remarkable disposition during the COVID-19 pandemic by Bharat Biotech and the Serum Institute of India. India's biopharmaceutical industry has been instrumental in producing and supplying preventives and therapeutics to fight COVID-19. Despite a weak supply chain and workforce pressure, the production was augmented to provide reasonably priced high-quality medications to more than 133 nations. Biosimilars could cost-effectively treat chronic diseases involving expensive conventional therapies, including diabetes, respiratory ailments, cancer, and connective tissue diseases. Biologics and biosimilars have been and are being tested to treat and manage COVID-19 symptoms characterized by inflammation and respiratory distress.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although India boasts many universities, research centers, and a relatively skilled workforce, its global University-Industry collaboration ranking is 24, IPR ranking remains 47 and innovation ranking 39. This reveals a wide industry-academia gap to bridge. There are gaps in effective translational research in India that must be promptly and appropriately addressed. Innovation demands strong and effective collaborations among universities, techno-incubators, and industries.
METHODOLOGY: Many successful research findings in academia do not get translation opportunities supposedly due to low industrial collaboration, low IP knowledge, and publication pressure with stringent timelines. In light of this, a detailed review of literature, including policy papers, government initiatives, and corporate reviews, was carried out, and the compilation and synthesis of the secondary data were meticulously summarized for the easy comprehension of the facts and roadmap ahead. For easy comprehension, charts, figures, and compiled tables are presented.
RESULTS: This review assesses India's situation in the biosimilar space, the gaps and areas to improve for Indian investment strategies, development, and innovation, addressing need for a more skilled workforce, industrial collaboration, and business models.
CONCLUSIONS: This review also proposes forward an approach to empowering technopreneurs to develop MSMEs for large-scale operations to support India in taking innovative thoughts to the global level to ultimately realize a self-reliant India. The limitations of the compilation are also highlighted towards the end.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Feb;31(2):104-7 [PMID: 23392503]
  2. Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):1953-1954 [PMID: 36253457]
  3. Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Dec;22 Suppl:DC48-52 [PMID: 15583685]
  4. Manage Sci. 2013 Feb;59(2):504-525 [PMID: 24470690]
  5. Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):675 [PMID: 32113494]
  6. Int Immunol. 2001 Dec;13(12):1551-9 [PMID: 11717196]
  7. P T. 2017 Aug;42(8):509-512 [PMID: 28781504]
  8. J Pharm Innov. 2022;17(4):1555-1562 [PMID: 34849178]
  9. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Apr-Jun;7(2):62-7 [PMID: 27141471]
  10. Biologicals. 2020 May;65:1-9 [PMID: 32224101]
  11. Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jul;20 Suppl:BE64-6 [PMID: 12089593]
  12. Oncologist. 2018 Mar;23(3):346-352 [PMID: 29284760]
  13. PLoS Med. 2005 May;2(5):e127 [PMID: 15916465]
  14. F1000Res. 2020 Apr 1;9:225 [PMID: 32566139]
  15. Open Med (Wars). 2021 Mar 29;16(1):491-493 [PMID: 33817327]
  16. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2022 May;99(5):769-788 [PMID: 35184391]
  17. J Pharm Innov. 2022 Aug 15;:1-10 [PMID: 35992018]
  18. Indian J Med Res. 2020 Nov;152(5):456-467 [PMID: 33707387]
  19. Transfus Med Rev. 2007 Apr;21(2):101-17 [PMID: 17397761]
  20. Ophthalmology. 2022 Jan;129(1):54-63 [PMID: 33957183]
  21. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;26(11):1235-40 [PMID: 18997760]
  22. BioDrugs. 2017 Feb;31(1):1-36 [PMID: 28078656]
  23. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(11):2660-2665 [PMID: 30973039]
  24. Perspect Public Health. 2022 Jan;142(1):20-21 [PMID: 35018855]
  25. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Jun;44(6 Suppl):S2-8 [PMID: 26058550]
  26. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Aug 1;56(suppl_4):iv14-iv29 [PMID: 28903544]
  27. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 May;1491(1):42-59 [PMID: 33222245]
  28. J Neurol Sci. 2012 Feb 15;313(1-2):1-6 [PMID: 22047648]
  29. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014 May;12(4):207-18 [PMID: 24831787]
  30. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):12-15 [PMID: 30906134]
  31. Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Dec;22 Suppl:DC31-6 [PMID: 15583682]
  32. Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7735):S53-S55 [PMID: 30542184]
  33. Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;31(3):195-201 [PMID: 23471064]
  34. Global Health. 2011 Apr 20;7:9 [PMID: 21507259]
  35. Anal Chem. 2017 Nov 7;89(21):11839-11845 [PMID: 28937210]
  36. J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Aug 14;1(4):218-225 [PMID: 31660213]
  37. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;25(4):403-17 [PMID: 17420744]
  38. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Dec;114(12):2696-2705 [PMID: 28842986]
  39. Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106835 [PMID: 35963574]
  40. Nature. 2005 Jul 28;436(7050):480-3 [PMID: 16049469]
  41. Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Apr 1;96(4):281-285 [PMID: 29695884]
  42. Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;28(9):907-9 [PMID: 20829824]
  43. J Dermatolog Treat. 2015;26(4):299-302 [PMID: 26105205]
  44. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2065824 [PMID: 35594528]
  45. J Med Virol. 2022 Jun;94(6):2336-2342 [PMID: 35118666]
  46. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2003;84:1-48 [PMID: 12934932]
  47. Indian J Med Res. 2020 Oct;152(4):335-341 [PMID: 33380698]
  48. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Jun 06;10:18 [PMID: 22672351]
  49. BioDrugs. 2022 May;36(3):359-371 [PMID: 35596890]
  50. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2017 Aug;64:11-21 [PMID: 28511068]
  51. Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;10:1066425 [PMID: 36504935]
  52. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:874916 [PMID: 26682224]
  53. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021 Jan;21(1):19-28 [PMID: 32634326]
  54. Vaccine. 2018 Jun 7;36(24):3408-3410 [PMID: 29609965]
  55. Stat Med. 2013 Feb 10;32(3):361-3 [PMID: 23307569]
  56. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jan 1;8(1):179-185 [PMID: 24876554]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0IndiabiosimilarsIndianglobalbiologicsapprovalCOVID-19workforceresearchcollaborationrankingreviewfirstmedicationsindustryproductionimprovehealthcareegIndia'spressureBiosimilarstreatdiseasesincludingrespiratoryuniversitiesskilledinnovationgapseffectivelowindustrialcompilationeasycomprehensionalsoBACKGROUND:pharmasectorfastshiftinggenericsEurope2006followedUS2015formHepatitisBvaccinesawrecombinant2000Around20%generic62%vaccinesnowsuppliedpharmaceuticalgoodpositionpotentiallyviadecreasedtreatmentcostwitnessedlargeinvestmentsyearsNumerousIndia-brednewplayersEnzeneBiosciencesLtdkeenjoinedracealongsideemerginggiantsBioconDrReddy'spositivesignremarkabledispositionpandemicBharatBiotechSerumInstitutebiopharmaceuticalinstrumentalproducingsupplyingpreventivestherapeuticsfightDespiteweaksupplychainaugmentedprovidereasonablypricedhigh-quality133nationscost-effectivelychronicinvolvingexpensiveconventionaltherapiesdiabetesailmentscancerconnectivetissueBiologicstestedmanagesymptomscharacterizedinflammationdistressPURPOSEOFREVIEW:AlthoughboastsmanycentersrelativelyUniversity-Industry24IPRremains4739revealswideindustry-academiagapbridgetranslationalmustpromptlyappropriatelyaddressedInnovationdemandsstrongcollaborationsamongtechno-incubatorsindustriesMETHODOLOGY:ManysuccessfulfindingsacademiagettranslationopportunitiessupposedlydueIPknowledgepublicationstringenttimelineslightdetailedliteraturepolicypapersgovernmentinitiativescorporatereviewscarriedsynthesissecondarydatameticulouslysummarizedfactsroadmapaheadchartsfigurescompiledtablespresentedRESULTS:assessessituationbiosimilarspaceareasinvestmentstrategiesdevelopmentaddressingneedbusinessmodelsCONCLUSIONS:proposesforwardapproachempoweringtechnopreneursdevelopMSMEslarge-scaleoperationssupporttakinginnovativethoughtslevelultimatelyrealizeself-reliantlimitationshighlightedtowardsendVaccinesCrossroads-ReplicatingSuccessPharmagenericsscenariohumanresourcepharmagenericsvisionaryperspective

Similar Articles

Cited By