App development in a sports science setting: A systematic review and lessons learned from an exemplary setting to generate recommendations for the app development process.

Bettina Barisch-Fritz, Claudio R Nigg, Marc Barisch, Alexander Woll
Author Information
  1. Bettina Barisch-Fritz: Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  2. Claudio R Nigg: Institute of Sports Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  3. Marc Barisch: Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  4. Alexander Woll: Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Abstract

The digital health sector is rapidly growing. With only 4% of publishers out of academic settings, it is under-represented in app development. The objective of this study is to assess the current state of app development with a systematic review and a survey within an exemplary academic setting along the following research questions: (Q1) Are software engineering principles sufficiently known in the sports science app development context? (Q2) Is the role of sports scientists in the context of app development sufficiently understood? The systematic review was conducted by two independent reviewers within databases Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The PICO schema was used to identify the search term. We subtracted information about five main topics: development process, functional requirements and features, security, technology, and dissemination. The survey was developed by a multidisciplinary team and focused on five main topics. Out of 701 matches, 21 were included in the review. The development process was only described in seven studies. Functional requirements and features were considered in 11 studies, security in 3, technology in 13, and dissemination in 12 with varying details. Twelve respondents [mean age 33(7) years, 58% women] replied to the survey. The survey revealed limited knowledge in realization of security measures, underlying technology and source code management, and dissemination. Respondents were able to provide input on development processes as well as functional requirements and features. The involvement of domain experts is given in seven review studies and described in two more. In 50% of survey respondents, the role in app development is defined as a research assistant. We conclude that there is a varying degree of software engineering knowledge in the sports science app development context (Q1). Furthermore, we found that the role of sports scientists within app development is not sufficiently defined (Q2). We present recommendations for improving the success probability and sustainability of app development and give orientation on the potential roles of sports scientists as domain experts. Future research should focus on the generalizability of these findings and the reporting of the app development process.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 16;19(2):e42 [PMID: 28209558]
  2. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Mar 16;5(1):e20 [PMID: 29549072]
  3. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34 [PMID: 15471760]
  4. Mhealth. 2018 Jul 06;4:24 [PMID: 30148139]
  5. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362 [PMID: 23349621]
  6. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Aug 27;3:110 [PMID: 32904379]
  7. JMIR Form Res. 2018 Apr 27;2(1):e8 [PMID: 30684426]
  8. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006773 [PMID: 25869685]
  9. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Dec 20;9:151 [PMID: 23256730]
  10. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 3;8(3):e13057 [PMID: 32130169]
  11. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Jun 15;7:16 [PMID: 17573961]
  12. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 3;9(1):e30989 [PMID: 35113025]
  13. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 16;7(4):e11223 [PMID: 30990458]
  14. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Mar 22;2:18 [PMID: 31304366]
  15. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Feb 20;12:19 [PMID: 25889112]
  16. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232 [PMID: 28663162]
  17. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:1173-6 [PMID: 24109902]
  18. Psicothema. 2017 Nov;29(4):552-557 [PMID: 29048317]
  19. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jun 28;3(2):e24 [PMID: 27352884]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0developmentappsportsreviewsurveyprocesssystematicwithinresearchsoftwareengineeringsufficientlysciencerolescientistsrequirementsfeaturessecuritytechnologydisseminationstudiesdigitalhealthacademicexemplarysettingQ1Q2contexttwofivemainfunctionaldescribedsevenvaryingrespondentsknowledgedomainexpertsdefinedrecommendationssectorrapidlygrowing4%publisherssettingsunder-representedobjectivestudyassesscurrentstatealongfollowingquestions:principlesknowncontext?understood?conductedindependentreviewersdatabasesPubmedScopusWebScienceIEEEXplorePICOschemausedidentifysearchtermsubtractedinformationtopics:developedmultidisciplinaryteamfocusedtopics701matches21includedFunctionalconsidered1131312detailsTwelve[meanage337years58%women]repliedrevealedlimitedrealizationmeasuresunderlyingsourcecodemanagementRespondentsableprovideinputprocesseswellinvolvementgiven50%assistantconcludedegreeFurthermorefoundpresentimprovingsuccessprobabilitysustainabilitygiveorientationpotentialrolesFuturefocusgeneralizabilityfindingsreportingAppsetting:lessonslearnedgeneratebarriersimplementingappschecklistdigitalizationmobileapplications

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.