Reproducibility of the brief religious coping inventory with African athletes' sample using ordinal factor analytical approach.

Edmond Kwesi Agormedah, Frank Quansah, Medina Srem-Sai, Francis Ankomah, John Elvis Hagan, Thomas Schack
Author Information
  1. Edmond Kwesi Agormedah: Department of Business and Social Sciences Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
  2. Frank Quansah: Department of Educational Foundations, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.
  3. Medina Srem-Sai: Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Sports, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.
  4. Francis Ankomah: Department of Education and Psychology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
  5. John Elvis Hagan: Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
  6. Thomas Schack: Neurocognition and Action-Biomechanics-Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have revealed that religious coping strategy is common among athletes due to the stressful experiences before and during competitions as part of the mental preparations they go through, the uncertainty of sporting outcomes, and other organizational issues they encounter. This research assessed the reproducibility of the Brief Religious Coping (RCOPE) instrument in an African setting using athletes' samples from different countries. Particularly, the research sought to assess the (1) factor structure of Brief RCOPE with an African sample, (2) construct validity of the RCOPE measure, and (3) measurement invariance of the RCOPE instrument based on gender and nationality.
Methods: The study surveyed a convenient sample of 300 athletes, including 164 male and 136 female athletes, from 3 African countries (Benin, Ghana, and Nigeria) who participated in the 2018 West African University Games. The Brief RCOPE instrument was administered to the athletes for validation purposes before the competition. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted using the ordinal factor analytic approach.
Results: This validation study confirmed the two-factor dimension (positive and negative religious coping) of the Brief RCOPE measure. Further, all items for each of the dimensions of the inventory contributed significantly to the measure of the Brief RCOPE domains. The positive and negative religious coping dimensions contributed more than half of the variance of their respective indicators. Measurement invariance across gender and nationality was confirmed.
Conclusion: Sufficient evidence was gathered to support the interpretation and use of the Brief RCOPE measure. Coaches and sports psychologists could adopt the Brief RCOPE measure to understand the mental or thought patterns of religious athletes based on existential concerns or stress accrued from impending competitions to inform appropriate religious coping interventions. This notwithstanding, the Minimum Clinical Important Difference (MCID) of the Brief RCOPE should be further investigated to enhance the utility of the instrument for use in intervention-based studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 16;16:13 [PMID: 28239407]
  2. Afr Health Sci. 2016 Jun;16(2):497-506 [PMID: 27605965]
  3. BMC Psychol. 2022 Aug 29;10(1):209 [PMID: 36038931]
  4. Alpha Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 28;22(4):194-199 [PMID: 36424939]
  5. Psychooncology. 2017 Feb;26(2):270-277 [PMID: 26567771]
  6. Psychooncology. 2021 Sep;30(9):1457-1465 [PMID: 33864325]
  7. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Sep;31(9):1068-76 [PMID: 27149968]
  8. Glob Public Health. 2017 Dec;12(12):1479-1491 [PMID: 28278753]
  9. J Relig Health. 2017 Apr;56(2):380-387 [PMID: 26693721]
  10. Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Aug;16(4):315-22 [PMID: 27391569]
  11. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Nov;85(6):565-75 [PMID: 26301940]
  12. Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):1014-20 [PMID: 20511389]
  13. Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1150-2 [PMID: 19120943]
  14. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Sep;82(3):412-23 [PMID: 21957699]
  15. J Relig Health. 2021 Oct;60(5):3484-3499 [PMID: 33755818]
  16. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Mar;28(2):e12984 [PMID: 30628124]
  17. Psychol Methods. 2011 Jun;16(2):209-20 [PMID: 21500916]
  18. Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):147-81 [PMID: 26754265]
  19. J Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;61(4):461-80 [PMID: 15503316]
  20. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Aug;40:6-9 [PMID: 32854015]
  21. Couns Psychol. 2017 Feb;45(2):213-236 [PMID: 29033462]
  22. J Behav Med. 2006 Apr;29(2):191-201 [PMID: 16453068]
  23. J Relig Health. 2013 Sep;52(3):930-40 [PMID: 21979810]
  24. J Relig Health. 2017 Apr;56(2):575-590 [PMID: 27287259]
  25. J Relig Health. 2022 Feb;61(1):109-124 [PMID: 34480690]
  26. J Clin Psychol. 2000 Apr;56(4):519-43 [PMID: 10775045]
  27. J Transcult Nurs. 2011 Jul;22(3):248-56 [PMID: 21505097]
  28. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019 Nov 11;41(6):556-561 [PMID: 31772443]
  29. J Relig Health. 2021 Feb;60(1):475-487 [PMID: 31907768]
  30. J Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;9(6):713-30 [PMID: 15367751]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RCOPEBriefreligiouscopingathletesAfricanfactormeasureinstrumentusingsamplestudiescompetitionsmentalresearchreproducibilityathletes'countries3invariancebasedgendernationalitystudyvalidationordinalapproachconfirmedpositivenegativedimensionsinventorycontributeduseBackground:PreviousrevealedstrategycommonamongduestressfulexperiencespartpreparationsgouncertaintysportingoutcomesorganizationalissuesencounterassessedReligiousCopingsettingsamplesdifferentParticularlysoughtassess1structure2constructvaliditymeasurementMethods:surveyedconvenient300including164male136femaleBeninGhanaNigeriaparticipated2018WestUniversityGamesadministeredpurposescompetitionExploratoryconfirmatoryanalysesconductedanalyticResults:two-factordimensionitemssignificantlydomainshalfvariancerespectiveindicatorsMeasurementacrossConclusion:SufficientevidencegatheredsupportinterpretationCoachessportspsychologistsadoptunderstandthoughtpatternsexistentialconcernsstressaccruedimpendinginformappropriateinterventionsnotwithstandingMinimumClinicalImportantDifferenceMCIDinvestigatedenhanceutilityintervention-basedReproducibilitybriefanalyticalAfricamechanismsanalysisreligion

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)