OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Journal of anesthesia
06, 2023;37 (3): 364-370.

Authorship by gender in anesthesiology journals: a retrospective cross-sectional study for Japan.

Michiko Kinoshita, Mina Takahashi, Katsuya Tanaka, Yoko Sakai
Author Information
  1. Michiko Kinoshita: Department of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University Hospital, 2-50-1 Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima-Shi, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan. michiko-kinoshita@tokushima-u.ac.jp. ORCID
  2. Mina Takahashi: Department of Anesthesiology, Tokushima Prefectural Miyoshi Hospital, 815-2 Shima Ikeda-Cho, Miyoshi-Shi, Tokushima, 778-8503, Japan.
  3. Katsuya Tanaka: Department of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University Hospital, 2-50-1 Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima-Shi, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
  4. Yoko Sakai: Division of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University Hospital, 2-50-1 Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima-Shi, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
PMID: 36688988 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03165-9

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although it is important to recognize gender disparities in publishing to achieve gender diversity, women's authorship in Japan remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the percentage and analyze the trends of articles authored and published in anesthesiology journals by Japanese female authors.
METHODS: The genders of the first and last authors affiliated with Japanese institutions were surveyed in the Journal of Anesthesia (JA) (1990, 1995, and 2000-2022) and 11 international anesthesiology journals (2010-2022).
RESULTS: We included 845 and 819 original research articles from JA in the analyses of the first and last authors, respectively. The proportion of female first authors significantly increased from 41 (11.7%) out of 351 before 2009 to 119 (24.1%) out of 494 after 2010 (p < 0.001). The proportion of female last authors was 11 (3.3%) out of 335 before 2009 and 22 (4.5%) out of 484 after 2010, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.470). We included 624 and 572 original research articles from international anesthesiology journals in the analyses of first and last authors, respectively. Among these, there were 134 (21.5%) and 23 (4.0%) female first and last authors, respectively. These proportions in international anesthesiology journals did not significantly differ from those in JA (p = 0.334, p = 0.789, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The percentage of female first authors has increased, commensurate with the percentage of female anesthesiologists. However, the percentage of female last authors has not increased and remains low in Japan.

Keywords

Anesthesiology Authorship Diversity Gender gap Woman

References

  1. Chatani Y, Nomura K, Ishiguro A, Jagsi R. Factors associated with attainment of specialty board qualifications and doctor of medical science degrees among Japanese female doctors. Acad Med. 2016;91:1173–80. [PMID: 27276005]
  2. Ramakrishnan A, Sambuco D, Jagsi R. Women’s participation in the medical profession: insights from experiences in Japan, Scandinavia, Russia, and Eastern Europe. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014;23:927–34. [PMID: 25320867]
  3. Yasukawa K. Gender inequality in academic medicine in Japan. Med Teach. 2013;35:700. [PMID: 23899313]
  4. Lundine J, Bourgeault IL, Clark J, Heidari S, Balabanova D. The gendered system of academic publishing. Lancet. 2018;391:1754–6. [PMID: 29739551]
  5. Rong LQ, Khan FM, Naik A, Robinson NB, Hameed I, Anderson LP, Rahouma M, Monteiro A, Sandner SE, Girardi LN, Pryor KO, Gaudino M. Gender differences in the authorship of contemporary anaesthesia literature: a cross-sectional study. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126:e162–4. [PMID: 33640120]
  6. Pagel PS, Freed JK, Lien CA. A 50-year analysis of gender differences in United States authorship of original research articles in two major anesthesiology journals. Scientometrics. 2019;121:371–86. [DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03192-y]
  7. Pagel PS, Freed JK, Lien CA. Gender differences in authorship in the Journal of cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: a 28-year analysis of publications originating from the United States, 1990–2017. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33:593–9. [PMID: 30638921]
  8. Miller J, Chuba E, Deiner S, DeMaria S Jr, Katz D. Trends in authorship in anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:306–10. [PMID: 30418237]
  9. Flexman AM, Parmar A, Lorello GR. Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66:495–502. [PMID: 30805906]
  10. Larivière V, Ni C, Gingras Y, Cronin B, Sugimoto CR. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature. 2013;504:211–3. [PMID: 24350369]
  11. Bendels MHK, Müller R, Brueggmann D, Groneberg DA. Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0189136. [PMID: 29293499]
  12. Herring C. Does diversity pay?: race, gender, and the business case for diversity. Am Sociol Rev. 2009;74:208–24. [DOI: 10.1177/000312240907400203]
  13. Valantine HA, Collins FS. National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:12240–2. [PMID: 26392553]
  14. Gomez LE, Bernet P. Diversity improves performance and outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019;111:383–92. [PMID: 30765101]
  15. Sugimoto CR, Ahn YY, Smith E, Macaluso B, Larivière V. Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis. Lancet. 2019;393:550–9. [PMID: 30739690]
  16. Li Z, Qiu LX, Wu FX, Yang LQ, Sun YM, Yu WF. Scientific publications in anesthesiology journals from East Asia: a 10-year survey of the literature. J Anesth. 2011;25:257–62. [PMID: 21212991]
  17. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:452–8. [DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244]
  18. McMullen K, Kraus MB, Kosiorek H, Harbell MW. Representation of women as editors in anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:956–63. [PMID: 35073283]
  19. Goldstone K, Edgley C, Mehta S, Leslie K. Peer review for the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia in 2016 and 2017: a retrospective analysis by reviewer and author gender. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:336–42. [PMID: 31741300]
  20. Pagel PS, Freed JK, Lien CA. Gender composition and trends of journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia editorial board membership: a 33-year analysis, 1987–2019. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33:3229–34. [PMID: 31412981]
  21. Lorello GR, Parmar A, Flexman AM. Representation of women on the editorial board of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis from 1954 to 2018. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66:989–90. [PMID: 31037587]
  22. Bissing MA, Lange EMS, Davila WF, Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Stock MC, Toledo P. Status of women in academic anesthesiology: a 10-year update. Anesth Analg. 2019;128:137–43. [PMID: 30096082]
  23. Silver JK. Gender equity on journal editorial boards. Lancet. 2019;393:2037–8. [PMID: 31106748]
  24. Balasubramanian S, Saberi S, Yu S, Duvernoy CS, Day SM, Agarwal PP. Women representation among cardiology journal editorial boards. Circulation. 2020;141:603–5.
  25. Pinho-Gomes AC, Vassallo A, Thompson K, Womersley K, Norton R, Woodward M. Representation of women among editors in chief of leading medical journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2123026. [PMID: 34495341]
  26. Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, de Rijcke S, Rafols I. Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015;520:429–31. [PMID: 25903611]
  27. McKiernan EC, Schimanski LA, Nieves CM, Matthias L, Niles MT, Alperin JP. Use of the journal impact factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. Elife. 2019;8:e47338. [PMID: 31364991]
  28. Bendels MHK, Dietz MC, Brüggmann D, Oremek GM, Schöffel N, Groneberg DA. Gender disparities in high-quality dermatology research: a descriptive bibliometric study on scientific authorships. BMJ Open. 2018;8:020089. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020089]
  29. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, Henault LE, Chang Y, Starr R, Tarbell NJ, Hylek EM. The “Gender Gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:281–7. [PMID: 16855268]
  30. West JD, Jacquet J, King MM, Correll SJ, Bergstrom CT. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66212. [PMID: 23894278]
  31. Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA. 2015;314:1149–58. [PMID: 26372584]
  32. Zhuge Y, Kaufman J, Simeone DM, Chen H, Velazquez OC. Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery? Ann Surg. 2011;253:637–43. [PMID: 21475000]
  33. Methangkool E, Brodt J, Kolarczyk L, Ivascu NS, Hicks MH, Herrera E, Oakes D. Perceptions of gender disparities among women in cardiothoracic anesthesiology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36:1859–66. [PMID: 34903458]
  34. Flexman AM, Shillcutt SK, Davies S, Lorello GR. Current status and solutions for gender equity in anaesthesia research. Anaesthesia. 2021;76:32–8. [PMID: 33682100]
  35. Lorello GR, Cil T, Flexman AM. Women anesthesiologists’ journeys to academic leadership: a constructivist grounded theory-inspired study. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:1130–9. [PMID: 32514695]
  36. Carter JC, Garden AL. The Gap between attitudes and processes related to ‘family-friendly’ practices in anaesthesia training in New Zealand: a survey of anaesthesia supervisors of training and departmental directors. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020;48:454–64. [PMID: 33198475]
  37. Bosco L, Lorello GR, Flexman AM, Hastie MJ. Women in anaesthesia: a scoping review. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:e134–47. [PMID: 31983412]
  38. Zdravkovic M, Osinova D, Brull SJ, Prielipp RC, Simões CM, Berger-Estilita J, Collaborators. Perceptions of gender equity in departmental leadership, research opportunities, and clinical work attitudes: an international survey of 11 781 anaesthesiologists. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:e160–70.
  39. Bryant LD, Burkinshaw P, House AO, West RM, Ward V. Good practice or positive action? using Q methodology to identify competing views on improving gender equality in academic medicine. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015973. [PMID: 28830870]
  40. Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science. 2012;335:582–6. [PMID: 22245740]
  41. Hamel MB, Ingelfinger JR, Phimister E, Solomon CG. Women in academic medicine—progress and challenges. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:310–2. [PMID: 16855274]
  42. Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L. How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:4403–8. [PMID: 24616490]
  43. Murakami Y, Borgonovi F. Japan needs gender equality. Science. 2018;362:133. [PMID: 30309919]
  44. Bian L, Leslie SJ, Cimpian A. Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science. 2017;355:389–91. [PMID: 28126816]
  45. Lerchenmueller MJ, Sorenson O, Jena AB. Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study. BMJ. 2019;367:l6573. [PMID: 31843745]
  46. Demailly Z, Brulard G, Selim J, Compère V, Besnier E, Clavier T. Gender differences in professional social media use among anaesthesia researchers. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:e178–84. [PMID: 31987471]
  47. Huang J, Gates AJ, Sinatra R, Barabási AL. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:4609–16. [PMID: 32071248]

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Anesthesiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Authorship
Retrospective Studies
Japan
Sex Factors
Periodicals as Topic
Journal Article
Article has an altmetric score of 4

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0authorsfemalefirstlastanesthesiologyrespectivelypercentagejournalsgenderJapanarticlesJA11internationalincreasedp = 0remainsstudyJapaneseincludedoriginalresearchanalysesproportionsignificantly2009201045%AuthorshipPURPOSE:Althoughimportantrecognizedisparitiespublishingachievediversitywomen'sauthorshipunclearThereforeaimedinvestigateanalyzetrendsauthoredpublishedMETHODS:gendersaffiliatedinstitutionssurveyedJournalAnesthesia199019952000-20222010-2022RESULTS:845819417%351119241%494p < 000133%33522484significantdifference470624572Among13421230%proportionsdiffer334789CONCLUSION:commensurateanesthesiologistsHoweverlowjournals:retrospectivecross-sectionalAnesthesiologyDiversityGendergapWoman

Similar Articles

Cited By