MRI-based brain tumor detection using convolutional deep learning methods and chosen machine learning techniques.

Soheila Saeedi, Sorayya Rezayi, Hamidreza Keshavarz, Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori
Author Information
  1. Soheila Saeedi: Medical Informatics and Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran.
  2. Sorayya Rezayi: Medical Informatics and Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran. sorayya_rezayi@yahoo.com.
  3. Hamidreza Keshavarz: Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori: Medical Informatics and Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detecting brain tumors in their early stages is crucial. Brain tumors are classified by biopsy, which can only be performed through definitive brain surgery. Computational intelligence-oriented techniques can help physicians identify and classify brain tumors. Herein, we proposed two deep learning methods and several machine learning approaches for diagnosing three types of tumor, i.e., glioma, meningioma, and pituitary gland tumors, as well as healthy brains without tumors, using magnetic resonance brain images to enable physicians to detect with high accuracy tumors in early stages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dataset containing 3264 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain images comprising images of glioma, meningioma, pituitary gland tumors, and healthy brains were used in this study. First, preprocessing and augmentation algorithms were applied to MRI brain images. Next, we developed a new 2D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a convolutional auto-encoder network, both of which were already trained by our assigned hyperparameters. Then 2D CNN includes several convolution layers; all layers in this hierarchical network have a 2*2 kernel function. This network consists of eight convolutional and four pooling layers, and after all convolution layers, batch-normalization layers were applied. The modified auto-encoder network includes a convolutional auto-encoder network and a convolutional network for classification that uses the last output encoder layer of the first part. Furthermore, six machine-learning techniques that were applied to classify brain tumors were also compared in this study.
RESULTS: The training accuracy of the proposed 2D CNN and that of the proposed auto-encoder network were found to be 96.47% and 95.63%, respectively. The average recall values for the 2D CNN and auto-encoder networks were 95% and 94%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curve for both networks were 0.99 or 1. Among applied machine learning methods, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) (28%) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) (86%) achieved the lowest and highest accuracy rates, respectively. Statistical tests showed a significant difference between the means of the two methods developed in this study and several machine learning methods (p-value < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the proposed 2D CNN has optimal accuracy in classifying brain tumors. Comparing the performance of various CNNs and machine learning methods in diagnosing three types of brain tumors revealed that the 2D CNN achieved exemplary performance and optimal execution time without latency. This proposed network is less complex than the auto-encoder network and can be employed by radiologists and physicians in clinical systems for brain tumor detection.

Keywords

References

  1. Comput Commun. 2021 Aug 1;176:234-248 [PMID: 34149118]
  2. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Sep;10(3):257-273 [PMID: 28689314]
  3. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:221-248 [PMID: 28301734]
  4. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jul 01;20(7):2095-2101 [PMID: 31350971]
  5. Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Aug 04;8:2015-22 [PMID: 26346558]
  6. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Sep;26(9):4509-4522 [PMID: 28641250]
  7. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2020 Jul;60:126474 [PMID: 32146339]
  8. Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88 [PMID: 28778026]
  9. Am J Med. 2018 Aug;131(8):874-882 [PMID: 29371158]
  10. Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):650-660 [PMID: 34226990]

MeSH Term

Humans
Brain Neoplasms
Deep Learning
Glioma
Machine Learning
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Meningeal Neoplasms
Meningioma
Pituitary Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0braintumorsnetworklearningmethods2DCNNauto-encoderproposedmachineconvolutionallayerstumorimagesaccuracystudyappliedcantechniquesphysiciansseveralrespectivelyearlystagesBrainclassifytwodeepdiagnosingthreetypesgliomameningiomapituitaryglandhealthybrainswithoutusingMRIdevelopedConvolutionalincludesconvolutionnetworksachievedoptimalperformancedetectionBACKGROUND:DetectingcrucialclassifiedbiopsyperformeddefinitivesurgeryComputationalintelligence-orientedhelpidentifyHereinapproachesiewellmagneticresonanceenabledetecthighMATERIALSANDMETHODS:datasetcontaining3264MagneticResonanceImagingcomprisingusedFirstpreprocessingaugmentationalgorithmsNextnewNeuralNetworkalreadytrainedassignedhyperparametershierarchical2*2kernelfunctionconsistseightfourpoolingbatch-normalizationmodifiedclassificationuseslastoutputencoderlayerfirstpartFurthermoresixmachine-learningalsocomparedRESULTS:trainingfound9647%9563%averagerecallvalues95%94%areasROCcurve0991AmongMultilayerPerceptronMLP28%K-NearestNeighborsKNN86%lowesthighestratesStatisticaltestsshowedsignificantdifferencemeansp-value < 005CONCLUSION:presentshowsclassifyingComparingvariousCNNsrevealedexemplaryexecutiontimelatencylesscomplexemployedradiologistsclinicalsystemsMRI-basedchosenneuralMachineMedicalimaging

Similar Articles

Cited By