Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiological approaches to inform COVID-19 surveillance and control: a systematic review of statistical and modelling methods in Africa.

Julius Nyerere Odhiambo, Carrie B Dolan, Lydia Troup, Nathaly Perez Rojas
Author Information
  1. Julius Nyerere Odhiambo: Ignite Global Health Research Lab, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA jnodhiambo@wm.edu. ORCID
  2. Carrie B Dolan: Ignite Global Health Research Lab, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA. ORCID
  3. Lydia Troup: Ignite Global Health Research Lab, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.
  4. Nathaly Perez Rojas: Ignite Global Health Research Lab, Global Research Institute, William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Various studies have been published to better understand the underlying spatial and temporal dynamics of COVID-19. This review sought to identify different spatial and spatio-temporal modelling methods that have been applied to COVID-19 and examine influential covariates that have been reportedly associated with its risk in Africa.
DESIGN: Systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
DATA SOURCES: Thematically mined keywords were used to identify refereed studies conducted between January 2020 and February 2022 from the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE via Proquest, CINHAL via EBSCOhost and Coronavirus Research Database via ProQuest. A manual search through the reference list of studies was also conducted.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Peer-reviewed studies that demonstrated the application of spatial and temporal approaches to COVID-19 outcomes.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A standardised extraction form based on critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies checklist was used to extract the meta-data of the included studies. A validated scoring criterion was used to assess studies based on their methodological relevance and quality.
RESULTS: Among 2065 hits in five databases, title and abstract screening yielded 827 studies of which 22 were synthesised and qualitatively analysed. The most common socioeconomic variable was population density. HIV prevalence was the most common epidemiological indicator, while temperature was the most common environmental indicator. Thirteen studies (59%) implemented diverse formulations of spatial and spatio-temporal models incorporating unmeasured factors of COVID-19 and the subtle influence of time and space. Cluster analyses were used across seven studies (32%) to explore COVID-19 variation and determine whether observed patterns were random.
CONCLUSION: COVID-19 modelling in Africa is still in its infancy, and a range of spatial and spatio-temporal methods have been employed across diverse settings. Strengthening routine data systems remains critical for generating estimates and understanding factors that drive spatial variation in vulnerable populations and temporal variation in pandemic progression.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021279767.

Keywords

References

  1. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211041208 [PMID: 34435530]
  2. BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):1490 [PMID: 34340668]
  3. Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Sep 02;148:e212 [PMID: 32873352]
  4. BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 23;20(1):700 [PMID: 32967639]
  5. Pan Afr Med J. 2021 May 07;39:19 [PMID: 34394810]
  6. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Mar 1;10(1):21 [PMID: 33648606]
  7. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100137 [PMID: 34173513]
  8. GeoJournal. 2022;87(4):3203-3217 [PMID: 33935350]
  9. BJPsych Open. 2020 Aug 17;6(5):e90 [PMID: 32799958]
  10. JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1891-1892 [PMID: 32293639]
  11. Sci Afr. 2021 Sep;13:e00949 [PMID: 34541427]
  12. Science. 2020 Jul 24;369(6502):413-422 [PMID: 32532802]
  13. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):557-565 [PMID: 33785897]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 14;18(20): [PMID: 34682528]
  15. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Jun;7(3):398-402 [PMID: 32306369]
  16. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Aug 04;35(Suppl 2):131 [PMID: 33193946]
  17. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2020 Oct 12;18(2):1499-1507 [PMID: 33072340]
  18. PeerJ. 2021 Feb 24;9:e11003 [PMID: 33665042]
  19. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 May 20;35(Suppl 2):41 [PMID: 33623566]
  20. Sci Afr. 2021 Jul;12:e00827 [PMID: 34250321]
  21. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Aug;10(8):e1099-e1114 [PMID: 35659911]
  22. Science. 2021 Jan 1;371(6524):27-28 [PMID: 33384364]
  23. Lancet. 2021 May 22;397(10288):1885-1894 [PMID: 34022988]
  24. Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 14;11(1):141 [PMID: 35836262]
  25. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 18;11(2):e044606 [PMID: 33602713]
  26. Appl Geogr. 2020 Dec;125:102358 [PMID: 33132463]
  27. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6): [PMID: 34103325]
  28. Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;9:628211 [PMID: 34195168]
  29. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10): [PMID: 33023880]
  30. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8): [PMID: 32839197]
  31. Heliyon. 2020 Aug;6(8):e04749 [PMID: 32835123]
  32. PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 14;11(10):e1001744 [PMID: 25314315]
  33. Science. 2016 Sep 2;353(6303):1033-1036 [PMID: 27701113]
  34. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):117 [PMID: 34090351]
  35. Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):447-453 [PMID: 33531710]
  36. Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Oct 29;147:e33 [PMID: 30369335]
  37. Vaccine. 2022 Mar 18;40(13):2011-2019 [PMID: 35184925]
  38. Immunity. 2021 Jul 13;54(7):1353-1362 [PMID: 34260880]
  39. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1047-1053 [PMID: 32199075]
  40. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Nov 2;10(11):e0005093 [PMID: 27806049]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Africa
Cluster Analysis