Dense is not green: How visual density influences greenness evaluation on environmentally friendly products.

Chunqu Xiao, Haoyuan Wang, Yayu Zhou, Qingyi Li
Author Information
  1. Chunqu Xiao: College of Business, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  2. Haoyuan Wang: School of Management, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
  3. Yayu Zhou: School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
  4. Qingyi Li: School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Abstract

Introduction: The visual design of environmentally friendly products has a strong influence on consumer decisions. The study offers a novel insight, suggesting that consumers' perceptions of environmentally friendly products may be affected by the visual density design.
Methods: Four experiments tested the effect of visual density on the perceived greenness of environmentally friendly products.
Results: Study 1 showed that perceived greenness was higher for environmentally friendly products with low visual density design. Study 2 repeatedly confirmed this impact and found that perceived production cost acted as a mediating factor. Study 3 and 4 found two boundary conditions for this effect. Study 3 showed that the effect of visual density design attenuated for consumers with weak holistic thinking. Study 4 further revealed that when emphasizing the use of environment-friendly materials, the effect of visual density design was also attenuated.
Discussion: The findings enrich the discussion on the visual design of green products, extend the effect of visual density on consumer attitudes, and provide practical implications for marketers to choose the appropriate appearance for environmentally friendly products.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 28;115(35):8722-8727 [PMID: 30131431]
  2. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Oct;180:110972 [PMID: 36540323]
  3. Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 17;13:580823 [PMID: 35795420]
  4. Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1045-67 [PMID: 20822208]
  5. J Vis. 2007 Aug 16;7(2):17.1-22 [PMID: 18217832]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8877-82 [PMID: 20421475]
  7. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 24;9(2):e89193 [PMID: 24586587]
  8. Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 25;12:760051 [PMID: 35145450]
  9. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 04;12:704855 [PMID: 34671290]
  10. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):46-59 [PMID: 12518970]
  11. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:832869 [PMID: 35548539]
  12. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 11;13:906869 [PMID: 36033063]
  13. Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 31;12:599385 [PMID: 34531775]
  14. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 02;13:790272 [PMID: 35983193]
  15. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1433 [PMID: 32793023]
  16. Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):73-97 [PMID: 16435958]
  17. Cognition. 2000 Apr 14;75(1):1-28 [PMID: 10815775]
  18. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 04;11:535489 [PMID: 33250801]
  19. Perception. 2016 Jul;45(7):739-54 [PMID: 26908567]
  20. Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;9:794195 [PMID: 34869197]
  21. Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 14;13:686373 [PMID: 35369243]
  22. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40333 [PMID: 22808136]
  23. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59 [PMID: 7962581]
  24. Percept Psychophys. 1988 May;43(5):494-507 [PMID: 3380640]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0visualproductsdensityenvironmentallyfriendlydesigneffectStudygreennessperceivedconsumershowedfound34attenuatedholisticthinkingevaluationIntroduction:stronginfluencedecisionsstudyoffersnovelinsightsuggestingconsumers'perceptionsmayaffectedMethods:FourexperimentstestedResults:1higherlow2repeatedlyconfirmedimpactproductioncostactedmediatingfactortwoboundaryconditionsconsumersweakrevealedemphasizinguseenvironment-friendlymaterialsalsoDiscussion:findingsenrichdiscussiongreenextendattitudesprovidepracticalimplicationsmarketerschooseappropriateappearanceDensegreen:influencesmetaphoricalmeaning

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)