Intraspecific variation in genome size in determined using flow cytometry and a genome survey.

Dandan Luo, Zeyi Zeng, Zongqi Wu, Changjie Chen, Tingting Zhao, Hongzhi Du, Yuhuan Miao, Dahui Liu
Author Information
  1. Dandan Luo: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China.
  2. Zeyi Zeng: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China.
  3. Zongqi Wu: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China.
  4. Changjie Chen: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China.
  5. Tingting Zhao: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China.
  6. Hongzhi Du: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China.
  7. Yuhuan Miao: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China.
  8. Dahui Liu: College of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065 China. ORCID

Abstract

Different collections and accessions of (Chinese mugwort) harbour considerable diversity in morphology and bioactive compounds, but no mechanisms have been reported that explain these variations. We studied genome size in accessions from different regions of China by flow cytometry. Genome size was significantly distinct among origins of these 42 Chinese mugwort accessions, ranging from 8.428 to 11.717 pg. There were no significant intraspecific differences among the 42 accessions from the five regions of China. The clustering analysis showed that these 42 accessions could be divided into three groups, which had no significant relationship with geographical location. In a genome survey, the total genome size of (A15) was estimated to be 7.852 Gb (or 8.029 pg) by -mer analysis. This indicated that the results from the two independent methods are consistent, and that the genome survey can be used as an adjunct to flow cytometry to compensate for its deficiencies. In addition, genome survey can provide the information about heterozygosity, repeat sequences, GC content and ploidy of genome. The nuclear DNA contents determined here provide a new reference for intraspecific variation in genome size in and may also be a potential resource for the study of genetic diversity and for breeding new cultivar.

Keywords

References

  1. Mol Plant. 2018 Dec 3;11(12):1482-1491 [PMID: 30342096]
  2. Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 15;33(14):2202-2204 [PMID: 28369201]
  3. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022 May;22(4):1493-1507 [PMID: 34758188]
  4. J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Feb;19(2):134-40 [PMID: 22757691]
  5. Plants (Basel). 2022 May 02;11(9): [PMID: 35567236]
  6. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022 Oct;20(10):1902-1915 [PMID: 35689517]
  7. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jul;17(4):686-693 [PMID: 27768249]
  8. Cytometry A. 2003 Feb;51(2):127-8; author reply 129 [PMID: 12541287]
  9. Ann Bot. 2022 Jul 19;130(1):11-25 [PMID: 35143612]
  10. Nat Genet. 2019 May;51(5):865-876 [PMID: 31043757]
  11. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2010 Sep 1;12(5):820-30 [PMID: 20701707]
  12. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Dec;27(12):698-704 [PMID: 22975220]
  13. Genome. 2011 Mar;54(3):175-83 [PMID: 21423280]
  14. Mol Plant. 2018 Jun 4;11(6):776-788 [PMID: 29703587]
  15. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010 Jul 05;10:33 [PMID: 20602794]
  16. Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1588-1592 [PMID: 27156790]
  17. Genes (Basel). 2021 Jun 11;12(6): [PMID: 34208200]
  18. Ann Bot. 2008 Jan;101(1):59-71 [PMID: 17998212]
  19. Springerplus. 2016 Sep 13;5(1):1560 [PMID: 27652133]
  20. Nat Prod Res. 2018 Mar;32(6):632-639 [PMID: 28539062]
  21. Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Jun;35(4):823-832 [PMID: 31446581]
  22. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002 Jun;50(6):735-49 [PMID: 12019291]
  23. Ann Bot. 2021 Mar 24;127(4):397-410 [PMID: 33507251]
  24. Mol Biol Rep. 2021 Aug;48(8):5897-5904 [PMID: 34297325]
  25. Biosci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;40(11): [PMID: 33111957]
  26. Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 1;24(5):713-4 [PMID: 18227114]
  27. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1115:279-307 [PMID: 24415480]
  28. New Phytol. 2019 Feb;221(3):1609-1618 [PMID: 30368824]
  29. Database (Oxford). 2019 Jan 1;2019: [PMID: 31608375]
  30. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Aug;46(15):3814-3823 [PMID: 34472254]
  31. Genome. 2004 Dec;47(6):1004-14 [PMID: 15644958]
  32. Phytomedicine. 2015 Dec 1;22(13):A1-3 [PMID: 26563851]
  33. Ann Bot. 2017 Aug 1;120(2):303-315 [PMID: 28398545]
  34. Genes (Basel). 2021 Apr 13;12(4): [PMID: 33924526]
  35. Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1323-35 [PMID: 17921526]
  36. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2022 Oct;24(6):1031-1042 [PMID: 35727918]
  37. Gene. 2019 Jul 30;707:205-211 [PMID: 30898697]
  38. Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 15;22(12):1540-2 [PMID: 16595560]
  39. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 Sep;19(9):1725-1742 [PMID: 33768699]
  40. Explore (NY). 2016 Jul-Aug;12(4):277-81 [PMID: 27234466]
  41. Sci China Life Sci. 2015 Nov;58(11):1175-9 [PMID: 26481135]
  42. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 May 15;31(10):e56 [PMID: 12736322]
  43. AoB Plants. 2010;2010:plq015 [PMID: 22476073]
  44. 3 Biotech. 2019 Dec;9(12):457 [PMID: 31832304]
  45. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Jul;46(13):3319-3329 [PMID: 34396751]
  46. Am Nat. 2011 Jul;178(1):75-87 [PMID: 21670579]
  47. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10 [PMID: 2231712]
  48. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Jun;46(11):2773-2782 [PMID: 34296575]
  49. BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Jul 08;15:174 [PMID: 26152193]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genomesizeaccessionssurveycytometryflowGenome42variationChinesemugwortdiversityregionsChinaamong8significantintraspecificanalysiscanprovidedeterminednewIntraspecificDifferentcollectionsharbourconsiderablemorphologybioactivecompoundsmechanismsreportedexplainvariationsstudieddifferentsignificantlydistinctoriginsranging42811717 pgdifferencesfiveclusteringshoweddividedthreegroupsrelationshipgeographicallocationtotalA15estimated7852 Gb029 pg-merindicatedresultstwoindependentmethodsconsistentusedadjunctcompensatedeficienciesadditioninformationheterozygosityrepeatsequencesGCcontentploidynuclearDNAcontentsreferencemayalsopotentialresourcestudygeneticbreedingcultivarusingArtemisiaargyiFlow

Similar Articles

Cited By